"There will be no winner
in a 'war of all against all'—particularly if it ends in a nuclear war. And
that is a possibility that cannot be ruled out."
While the Trump administration
ignores warnings from nuclear experts and pursues plans to exit the Cold
War-era intermediate-range nuclear forces treaty (INF) with Russia, former
President of the Soviet Union Mikhail Gorbachev—who initially signed the deal
with former President Ronald Reagan—has joined the chorus of voices cautioning
that ditching it poses "a dire threat to peace" by increasing the
risk of armed conflict.
Since reports emerged
last week that President Donald Trump's warmongering National Security Adviser
John Bolton was working within the administration to garner support for
dismantling the 1987 treaty, as experts have denounced the move as "stupid
and reckless" and a "colossal
mistake," the president and Bolton have doubled down, justifying the looming
withdrawal by claiming that
Russia is violating the deal by developing the 9M729 ground-launched cruise
missile.
Reflecting on the landmark
agreement, which led to significant reductions in both American and Russian
stockpiles of nuclear weapons, Gorbachev wrote in a New York Times op-ed published
Thursday: "I am being asked whether I feel bitter watching the demise of
what I worked so hard to achieve. But this is not a personal matter. Much more
is at stake. A new arms race has been announced."
Gorbachev noted that Trump's
decision to withdraw comes as American "military expenditures have soared
to astronomical levels and keep rising," and in the context of the
president's disdain for global cooperation. "There will be no winner in a
'war of all against all'—particularly if it ends in a nuclear war. And that is
a possibility that cannot be ruled out," the former Soviet leader warned.
"An unrelenting arms race, international tensions, hostility, and
universal mistrust will only increase the risk."
"With enough political
will, any problems of compliance with the existing treaties could be
resolved," Gorbachev pointed out. "But as we have seen during the
past two years, the president of the United States has a very different purpose
in mind. It is to release the United States from any obligations, any
constraints, and not just regarding nuclear missiles."
While urging the United States
and Russia "to return to dialogue and negotiations," he also called
on other nations to refuse to support a new nuclear arms race.
"I hope that America's
allies will, upon sober reflection, refuse to be launchpads for new American
missiles. I hope the United Nations, and particularly members of its Security
Council, vested by the United Nations Charter with primary responsibility for
maintaining international peace and security, will take responsible
action," he concluded. "Faced with this dire threat to peace, we are
not helpless. We must not resign, we must not surrender."
In addition to Gorbachev's
piece, the Times published on Thursday an op-ed in
which George Shultz, Reagan's former secretary of state, argued that "now
is not the time to build larger arsenals of nuclear weapons. Now is the time to
rid the world of this threat. Leaving the treaty would be a huge step backward.
We should fix it, not kill it."
No comments:
Post a Comment