"The industry executive
said the quiet part out loud," said one outside expert in response.
"Price-gouging is central to the industry business model."
Wednesday, November 27, 2019
Corporations' quest for
profits is what "is driving up drug prices and nothing more."
That's according to Dennis
Bourdette, M.D., chair of neurology in the Oregon Health and Science University
(OHSU) School of Medicine, who co-authored a study published
Monday that sought to find out companies' rationale for the escalating prices
on medications for patients with multiple sclerosis.
Prices for those drugs, an
accompanying press release notes, have jumped up by 10% to 15% every year for
the past decade.
The study by a team of
researchers at OHSU and the OHSU/Oregon State University College of
Pharmacy, which appears in the journal Neurology this
month, was based on interviews with four current and former pharmaceutical
industry executives who had direct involvement in the pricing or marketing
of MS drugs.
The executives, who were not
named, laid bare the motivating factor for the surges.
"I would say the
rationales for the price increases are purely what can maximize profit,"
sad one executive. "There's no other rationale for it, because costs [of
producing the drug] have not gone up by 10% or 15%; you know, the costs have
probably gone down."
Such statements, said the
researchers, counter the industry's narrative that
the high drug prices are an effort to recoup their research and development costs.
"The industry executive
said the quiet part out loud," said Zain Rizvi, law and policy researcher
with Public Citizen's Access to Medicines project, in a statement to Common
Dreams. "Price-gouging is central to the industry business model."
One executive inteviewed for
the study pointed out that the U.S. is a global outlier when it comes to the
price hikes. They said that "it is only in the United States, really, that
you can take price increases. You can't do it in the rest of the world. In the rest
of the world, prices decline with duration in the marketplace."
Maintaining or lowering the
prices would give a negative impression about the medication, said one
executive. "We can't come in at less," they said. "That would
mean we're less effective, we think less of our product, so we have to go
more."
The responses, said Bourdette,
who also directs the OHSU Multiple Sclerosis Center, speak volumes.
"The frank information
provided by these executives pulls back the curtain of secrecy on how drug
price decisions are made," he said.
While the new study focused on
MS medications, the issue of skyrocketing prices is more widespread. As
economist Dean Baker of the Center for Economic and Policy Research noted last
year:
"The government gives drug companies patent monopolies that make it
illegal for competitors to sell the same drug. These patent monopolies allow
companies to charge prices that are a hundred or even a thousand times the free
market price."
And other recent
research backs
up the case that drugmakers are relying on price hikes to drive their
growth.
Thus, the need for fundamental
change is clear, said Rizvi.
"This is not the case of
just one bad actor. This is the case of an entirely bad system," he added.
"The study underscores that we need a sea change in our drug pricing
system to put public health over private wealth."
No comments:
Post a Comment