Reviewed by Shelley
Walia
Cambridge: Polity. Pages
182. £14.99.
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2014/20140223/spectrum/book1.htm
COLLATERAL Damage as a
term is not unique to only armed conflict. As argued by Zygmunt Bauman in his
recent book Collateral Damage, it is also "one of the most salient and
striking dimensions of contemporary social inequality. The inflammable mixture
of growing social inequality and the rising volume of human suffering
marginalised as ‘collateral’ is becoming one of most cataclysmic problems of
our time."
Bauman goes on to elaborate
this idea: "For the political class, poverty is commonly seen as a problem
of law and order — a matter of how to deal with individuals, such as unemployed
youth, who fall foul of the law. But treating poverty as a criminal problem
obscures the social roots of inequality, which lie in the combination of a
consumerist life philosophy propagated and instilled by a consumer-oriented
economy, on the one hand, and the rapid shrinking of life chances available to the
poor, on the other."
Collateral damage is
contextualised within a broader global scenario where order and rationality
have ended in an "uncertainty and randomness of 'liquid' modernity".
Dreams of a progressive society now lie buried under consumerism that is
central to the crisis of modernity. Those at the margins stand neglected in a
world order where exclusivity of a few is guarded against any encroachments
from below.
Such a cultural struggle, as
argued by another contemporary cultural critic, Slavoj Zizek, is needed at
every level to fix the problem of this damage. His concern is with an economic
life that is pervaded by culture and is dependent on moral bonds of social
trust. Only societies with a high degree of social trust can create the kind of
flexible, large-scale business organisations needed for successful competition
in the emerging global economy and international order.
Joining hands with Marx
and Walter Benjamin, Zizek castigates the lack of aura in late capitalism:
"While capitalism does suspend the power of the old ghosts of tradition,
it generates its own monstrous ghosts. That is to say: On the one hand,
capitalism entails the radical secularization of social life — it mercilessly
tears apart any aura of authentic nobility, sacredness, honour, and so
on."
But where does this 'trust'
come from especially in a society where you have a new global class with
citizenships of various countries and ownership of mansions, cottages and
bungalows strewn across the globe? These global citizens live a private life of
seclusion, which is dotted with well-planned itineraries to the most exotic of
places and adventures in the most exhilarating of terrains. The farce lies in
the very idea of ‘fear’ that haunts the super rich who endeavour to keep themselves
away from disease, violence and crime. In such a world there is the absence of
the other less-'fortunate' classes.
All this opulence is
obviously gained through the predatory workings of the free-market economy
under capitalism. Bauman holds on to his faith in the emancipatory thinking of
Marx and Engels, who wrote in The Communist Manifesto that
"capitalism had drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervour,
of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of
egotistical calculation. It has resolved personal worth into exchange value,
and in place of the numberless indefeasible chartered freedoms, has set up that
single, unconscionable freedom — Free Trade. In one word, for exploitation,
veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked,
shameless, direct, brutal exploitation." In such a world of technological
development in the area of communication and surveillance, privacy is dead, and
"consumerism, built on capitalism's wager on the infinity of human needs,
makes the attempt to solve humanity's problems by finding or imposing ordered
solutions which is an impossibility, given the permanent state of recasting
needs and desires." Though global transformist thought in areas of social
justice, universal human rights, rule of law, global anti-war movements and
transnational goodwill remain an aspiration of survival, the free market
dramatics is underneath designed to accept casualties without questioning the
rationality of the system. Clearly "casualties are dubbed 'collateral' in
so far as they are dismissed as not important enough to justify the costs of
their prevention, or simply 'unexpected' because the planners did not consider
them worthy of inclusion among the objects of preparatory reconnoitering."
No comments:
Post a Comment