The NSA
claims it 'touches' only 1.6% of internet traffic – doesn't sound a lot. In
fact, that's practically everything that matters
Jeff Jarvis
theguardian.com, Tuesday 13 August 2013 07.45 EDT
Fear not, says
the NSA, we "touch" only 1.6% of daily internet traffic. If, as
they say, the net carries 1,826 petabytes of information per day, then the NSA "touches" about
29 petabytes a day. They don't say what "touch" means.
Ingest?
Store? Analyze?
For context,
Google in 2010 said it had indexed only
0.004% of the data on the net. So, by inference from the percentages, does that
mean that the NSA is equal to 400 Googles?
Seven
petabytes of photos are added to
Facebook each month. That's .23 petabytes per day. So that means the NSA is 126
Facebooks.
Keep in mind
that most of the data passing on the net is not email or web pages. It's
media. According to Sandvine
data (pdf) for the US fixed net from 2013, real-time entertainment
accounted for 62% of net traffic, P2P file-sharing for 10.5%.
The NSA
needn't watch all those episodes of Homeland (or maybe they should) or listen
to all that Coldplay – though, I'm sure the RIAA and MPAA are dying to know
what the NSA knows about who's "stealing" what, since that
"stealing" allegedly accounts for
23.8% of net traffic.
HTTP – the
web – accounts for only 11.8% of aggregated and download traffic in the US,
Sandvine says. Communications – the part of the net the NSA really cares about
– accounts for 2.9% in the US.
So, by very
rough, beer-soaked-napkin numbers, the NSA's 1.6% of net traffic would be half
of the communication on the net. That's one helluva lot of "touching".
Keep in mind
that, by one estimate, 68.8% of email is spam.
And, of
course, metadata doesn't add up to much data at all; it's just a few bits per
file – who sent what to whom – and that's where the NSA finds much of its
supposedly incriminating information. So, these numbers are meaningless when it
comes to looking at how much the NSA knows about who's talking to whom. With
the NSA's clearance to go three hops out from a suspect, it doesn't take very
long at all before this law of large numbers encompasses practically
everyone.
If you have
better data (and better math) than I have, please do share it.
No comments:
Post a Comment