By Philipp Oehmke
http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/the-most-dangerous-philosopher-in-the-west-welcome-to-the-slavoj-zizek-show-a-705164-2.html
[…]
Part 2: 'He'll Have to be Sent to the Gulag'
His repertoire is a mix of Lacanian psychoanalysis and
Hegel's idealist philosophy -- of film analysis, criticism of democracy,
capitalism and ideology, and an occasionally authoritarian Marxism paired with
everyday observations. He explains the ontological essence of the Germans,
French and Americans on the basis of their toilet habits and the resulting
relationship with their fecal matter, and he initially reacts to criticism with
a cheerful "Fuck you!" -- pronounced in hard Slavic consonants. He
tells colleagues he values but who advocate theories contrary to his own that
they should prepare to enter the gulag when he, Zizek, comes into power. He
relishes the shudder that the word gulag elicits.
"Take my friend Peter, for example, fucking Sloterdijk.
I like him a lot, but he'll obviously have to be sent to the gulag. He'll be in
a slightly better position there. Perhaps he could work as a cook."
One could say it's funny, especially the way Zizek delivers
it, in his exaggerated and emphatic way. But one could also think of the more
than 30 million people who fell victim to Soviet terror. Those who find Zizek's
remarks amusing could just as easily be telling jokes about concentration
camps.
"But you know?" Zizek says in response to such
criticism. "The best, most impressive films about the Holocaust are
comedies."
Two Posters of Stalin
Zizek loves to correct viewpoints when precisely the
opposite is considered correct. He calls this counterintuitive observation. His
favorite thought form is the paradox. Using his psychoanalytical skills, he
attempts to demonstrate how liberal democracy manipulates people. One of his
famous everyday observations on this subject relates to the buttons used to
close the door in elevators. He has discovered that they are placebos. The
doors don't close a second faster when one presses the button, but they don't
have to. It's sufficient that the person pressing the button has the illusion
that he is able to influence something. The political illusion machine that
calls itself Western democracy functions in exactly the same way, says Zizek.
His detractors accuse him of fighting liberal democracy and
of wanting to replace it with authoritarian Marxism, even Stalinism. They say
he is particularly dangerous because he cloaks his totalitarianism in pop
culture. The jacket of his book "In Defense of Lost Causes" depicts a
guillotine, the symbol of leftist terror decreed from above -- "good
terror," as Zizek has been known to say. The Suhrkamp publishing house
removed passages from the German edition of the book which reportedly toyed
with totalitarianism.
There are two posters of Josef Stalin on the wall in Zizek's
apartment in a new building in downtown Ljubljana.
"It doesn't mean anything! It's just a joke,"
Zizek is quick to point out.
He says that he'll be happy to remove the posters of Stalin
from the wall if they offend his visitors. And he says that he is tired of
being characterized as a Stalinist. He has been sharply criticized in recent
weeks in publications like the liberal, left-leaning US magazine The New
Republic, Germany's Merkur and the German weekly newspaper Die
Zeit. His critics write that Zizek's thoughts on communism ignore history and
are insufficiently serious, and that his theory of revolution is downright
fascist. And now he has even been accused, once again, of anti-Semitism. Even
Suhrkamp decided not to publish some of his writings, arguing that they could
-- maliciously -- be interpreted as anti-Semitic. These accusations are
opprobrious, but Zizek knows he isn't entirely innocent. His constant drilling,
poking and questioning is truly subversive, but sometimes it makes him
extremely vulnerable. He says that those who attack him in this way have rarely
comprehended his thoughts.
For Zizek, philosophy means thinking out of bounds -- far
removed from practical execution, as opposed to reality-based political
science, which must have its limits. When American leftist liberals accuse him
of making a case for a new leftist dictatorship, Zizek points out that it was
he, not they, who lived under (former Yugoslav dictator Josip) Tito and, as a
young professor, was barred from teaching.
The Itinerant Intellectual
Zizek's roughly 600-square-foot apartment looks as though
Tito were still in power. It consists of three rooms and is carelessly
furnished. A poster from a Mark Rothko exhibition hangs on the wall above the
sofa in Soviet-era colors; otherwise, the furnishings consist of a rack of
DVDs, bookshelves, mountains of "Star Wars" Legos and his laundry,
which he keeps in his kitchen cabinets. He serves iced tea in Disney cups.
He lives alone in the apartment, except when his son from
his second marriage stays with him. He also has a son from his first marriage.
His last wife was an Argentine lingerie model, 30 years his junior, the
daughter of a student of Lacan who, ironically enough, is named Analia.
Zizek wears jeans and a T-shirt, blue sandals from the Adlon
Hotel in Berlin and socks from Lufthansa's Business Class. "I haven't
bought any socks in years," he says. He stays in the best hotels, and he
has just returned from a trip to China and Los Angeles. He spoke about Mao in
China and Richard Wagner in Los Angeles. The Chinese had invited him because of
his status as a communist thought leader, but he doesn't believe that they
understand his theories.
"They translated 10 of my books, the idiots," says
Zizek. The Chinese translated the books as poetry and not as philosophical and
political works. The translators had supposedly never heard of Hegel and had no
idea what they were actually translating. To make up for these deficiencies,
they tried to make his words sound appealing.
The experience of meeting Zizek is initially fascinating for
everyone (for the first hour), then frustrating (it's impossible to get a word
in edgewise) and, finally, cathartic (the conversation does, eventually, come
to an end). Zizek begins to talk within the first few seconds, and in his case
talking means screaming, gesticulating, spitting and sweating. He has a speech
defect known as sigmatism, and when he pronounces the letter "s" it
sounds like a bicycle pump. He usually begins his discourse with the words
"Did you know…," and then he jumps from topic to topic, like a
thinking machine that's been stuffed with coins and from then on doesn't stop
spitting out words.
Empty Battery
Zizek has created an artificial character. His appearances
are performances, something between art and comedy. He says that he wants to
get away from these standup comedy appearances, and that he wants to give a
serious lecture in Berlin, mostly about Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, the
subject of his new book. He says that he has already written 700 pages. It
would take a normal person 10 years to write 700 pages about the man who may
have been the most difficult thinker in the history of philosophy. Zizek wrote
his 700 pages on airplanes in the last few months.
A comforting thing happens after exactly three hours in
Zizek time. Suddenly his battery seems to have run empty, and the machine
stops. Zizek has diabetes. His blood sugar is much too high, he says, or maybe
it's much too low. The symptoms seem to be particularly severe at the moment.
But Slavoj Zizek would not be Slavoj Zizek if he were to describe such a thing
in such banal terms. Instead, he says: "You know, my diabetes has now
become a self-perpetuating system, completely independent of external
influences! It does what it pleases. And now I have to go to sleep."
On the way to Berlin, Zizek has not managed to put together
his talk on the plane, as he had expected. While the speaker preceding him at
the Volksbühne, a short man from Turkey with long hair and a long beard,
is still speaking, Zizek is shifting papers from one stack to the next,
searching, writing things down and furiously reading his notes. Strands of hair
are pasted to his forehead. Zizek doesn't just sweat while speaking, but also
while thinking.
It is now the second day of the conference, and so far Zizek
has had to content himself by merely asking the speakers questions. Now, he
immediately attacks Negri who, on the previous day, had accused him and Badiou
of neglecting the class struggle. Negri's theory of the "multitude,"
that is, his concept of a revolutionary subject that sees commonality in the
differences among individuals, assumes that late capitalism eliminated itself,
and that this alone is the source of a revolutionary situation. This is far too
concrete and pragmatic for Zizek and Badiou. Zizek arms himself with Hegel's
concept of totality, with Plato's concept of truth and Heidegger's concept of
the event. He argues that to one has to be outside the state to abolish it, but
that Negri remains within the system, which is why his "multitude"
can never start a revolution.
'Think I'm an Idiot'
Negri, furrowing his leathery brow, reacts testily. Zizek,
he says, has lost the revolutionary subject, but without a revolutionary
subject there can be no resistance. Badiou observes the argument with the face
of an old turtle, as if he were wondering which of the two he would like to
send to a labor camp first. The moderator asks Badiou whether he would like to
comment. Badiou waves aside the question, flashes a wolfish grin, and says that
he intends to comment on Negri, and perhaps on Zizek, as well, the next day. It
sounds like a threat.
At the end of Zizek's lecture, an audience member asks a
complicated and unintelligible question. "You made a good point,"
says Zizek, and continues to talk about Hegel. His response has nothing to do
with the question, which in turn has nothing to do with the lecture. The game
could continue endlessly in the same vein. Suddenly Zizek pushes aside the
cardboard screen and interrupts his Hegel lecture. "Okay! It doesn't
matter. As I said already, you made quite a good point. And the truth is that I
have no response. In fact, my long-winded talk was also just an attempt to
cover up that fact!" The audience seems grateful, now that Zizek has said
that it's okay to say that you don't understand something and don't have a clue
as to what something is talking about. Even Zizek does it.
"I know that people often think I'm an idiot," he
says that evening, "that nostalgic Leninist. But I'm not crazy. I'm much
more modest and much more pessimistic."
Why pessimistic? In fact, it isn't absurd at all to assume
that capitalism and democracy have reached a dead end. "That's true,"
says Zizek, "but I believe that the left is, tragically, bereft of any
vision to be taken seriously. We all wish for a real, authentic revolution! But
it has take place far away, preferably in Cuba, Vietnam, China or Nicaragua.
The advantage of that is that it allows us to continue with our careers
here." He ends the conversation by saying that it's time for him to return
to his hotel -- you know, the diabetes, he says.
'See You Tomorrow!'
Late Saturday evening, just as the US and Ghana World Cup
match is in overtime, Zizek calls again. He sounds excited. "Did you watch
my clash with Negri today? Unbelievable! What is he talking about! That late
capitalism is doing away with itself?"
Zizek says that the revolution can never function without an
authority, without control, and that this was already the case during the
French Revolution and with the Jacobins.
He pauses. Zizek rarely pauses when he speaks, because it
makes him feel self-conscious for an instant.
Finally he says: The thing about the state and revolution
reminds him of women. "It's impossible to live with them, but even more
impossible without them."
He seems about to talk himself into a rage again, but just
as the machine is revving up he suddenly interrupts himself.
"Oh, let's forget about it. I'll see you tomorrow, my
friend!"
Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan
No comments:
Post a Comment