Wild bees and hoverflies lost
from a quarter of the places they were found in 1980, study shows
Environment editor
Tue 26 Mar 2019 12.00 EDT
A widespread loss of
pollinating insects in recent decades has been revealed by the first national
survey in Britain, which scientists say “highlights a fundamental
deterioration” in nature.
The analysis of 353 wild bee
and hoverfly species found the insects have been lost from a quarter of the
places they were found in 1980. A third of the species now occupy smaller
ranges, with just one in 10 expanding their extent, and the average number of
species found in a square kilometre fell by 11.
A small group of 22 bee
species known to be important in pollinating crops such as oilseed rape saw a
rise in range, potentially due to farmers increasingly planting wild flowers
around fields. However, the scientists found “severe” declines in other bee
species from 2007, coinciding with the introduction of a widely used
neonicotinoid insecticide, which
has since been banned.
Researchers have become
increasingly concerned about dramatic drops in populations of insects, which
underpin much of nature. Some warned in February that these falls threaten a “catastrophic
collapse of nature’s ecosystems”, while studies from Germany and Puerto
Rico have shown plunging numbers in the last 25 to 35 years.
The study, published in the
journal Nature Communications, is based on more than 700,000 sightings made
by volunteers across Britain from 1980 to 2013. These are used to map the range
of each species of bee and hoverfly over time. The data did not allow the
assessment of numbers of insects, but some researchers think populations have
fallen faster than range.
Pollinating insects are vital
to human food security, as three-quarters of crops depend on them. They are
also crucial to other wildlife, both as food and as pollinators of wild plants.
“The declines in Britain can be viewed as a warning about the health of our
countryside,” said Gary Powney at the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology in
Wallingford, who led the research.
He called for more volunteers
to take part in the UK
Pollinator Monitoring Scheme: “Their contribution is vital for us to
understand what is happening in our landscape.” Another recent study found that
allotments, weedy corners and fancy gardens can all be urban
havens for bees.
The biggest factor in the decline
in pollinators is likely to be the destruction of wild habitats and use
of pesticides as farming has intensified. But the analysis also
revealed a particularly big drop of 55% in the range of upland bee and hoverfly
species, and significant falls in northern Britain, which may result from
climate change making conditions too warm.
Among the bees whose range has
shrunk are the formerly widespread red-shanked carder bee, whose extent fell by
42%, and the large shaggy bee, whose range fell 53%. But the lobe-spurred
furrow bee, which was once rare, has expanded its range fivefold and is now
considered an important crop pollinator in England.
Powney said the increased
range of the bees most commonly pollinating crops is good news and might be a
result of more oilseed rape being grown, as well as wildflower margins being
planted. But he also warned: “They are a relatively small group of species.
Therefore, with species having declined overall, it would be risky to rely on
this group to support the long-term food security for our country. If anything
happens to them in the future there will be fewer other species to ‘step up’.”
Prof Dave Goulson, at the
University of Sussex and not part of the latest research, said: “Previous
studies have described declines in UK butterflies, moths, carabid beetles, bees
and hoverflies – this new study confirms that declines in insects are ongoing.”
If the losses of upland and
northern species are due to climate change, “then we can expect far more rapid
declines of these species in the future, as climate change has barely got
started”, he said. Goulson also said the start of more rapid declines in
southern bees after 2007 coincided with the first use of now-banned
neonicotinoid pesticides.
Roy van Grunsven, at the Dutch
Butterfly Conservation project,
said the decline in numbers of insects was very likely to be a lot higher than
the shrinking of their range: “Going from flowery meadows full of bees to
intensive agriculture with a few individuals in a road verge does not result in
a change in distribution, but of course is a huge change in [numbers].”
Matt Shardlow, of the
conservation charity Buglife, said unless the pesticide approval process was
improved to help bee safety and green subsidies were targeted to create
corridors that connect wild spaces, we can expect the declines to continue or
worsen.
No comments:
Post a Comment