"If anything, Senator
Sanders has underestimated the size of the post-crisis bailouts," Arianna
Jones, a spokeswoman for Sanders' 2020 presidential campaign
Progressive critics
accused Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler of cherry-picking
evidence, playing semantic games, and obscuring the truth on Monday after
he said Sen.
Bernie Sanders inflated the amount of taxpayer bailout money Wall Street
received following the 2008 financial crisis.
Kessler took issue with a line
the Vermont Independent and 2020 presidential contender often includes in his
stump speeches: "Not one major Wall Street executive went to jail for
destroying our economy in 2008 as a result of their greed, recklessness, and
illegal behavior. No. They didn't go to jail. They got a trillion-dollar
bailout."
Dismissing the trillion-dollar
figure as "a nice round number" that is "not borne out by the
facts," Kessler added up the amount of aid major banks received through
the 2008 Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).
Even under an expansive
definition of Wall Street, Kessler asserted, the bailout amounted to "just
over $500 billion—or half a trillion." Under the Post's vaguely
defined scoring system, Kessler rewarded Sanders with two
"Pinocchios."
But Sanders' team and other
critics were quick to argue that Kessler's focus on
TARP funds was overly narrow and neglected emergency
loans from the Federal Reserve that amounted to trillions of dollars
in bailout money that kept Wall Street afloat.
"If anything, Senator
Sanders has underestimated the size of the post-crisis bailouts," Arianna
Jones, a spokeswoman for Sanders' 2020 presidential campaign, told the Post.
Jones pointed to several studies and news
reports showing that Fed loans exceeded a trillion dollars and may
have been as high as $29 trillion.
"Sorry, Wall Street got a
MULTI-trillion bailout," tweeted Warren Gunnels, Sanders' staff director.
A 2011 study (pdf)
from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), which Kessler quotes in his
piece, concluded that loans from the Fed "peaked at more than $1 trillion
in late 2008."
Gunnels highlighted this
figure and others in a series of tweets:
Responding to Jones' rebuttal,
Kessler—who sparked outrage last year after his error-riddled Medicare
for All "fact-check"—argued that "there is a definitional issue
about what one considers a bailout" and suggested that loans from the Fed
may not fit his definition.
This argument sparked
ridicule on social media, with critics accusing Kessler of playing
word games to score cheap points at the expense of factual accuracy.
"This is a total
embarrassment for the Washington Post," HuffPost reporter
Zach Carter tweeted.
"This gets to the heart of the problem with Glenn's operation. The piece
portends to be an exercise in empirical rigor and mathematical precision. But
he's really just playing games with semantics and definitions. And people who
understand the issues he 'fact-checks' can see it."
Alex Lawson, executive
director of Social Security Works, added:
"if they had any shame, they would be ashamed."
No comments:
Post a Comment