"Science confirms that
gas is a climate killer."
After a frightening study from
last week showed that industrial methane emissions have been "vastly
underestimated," a new projection Friday that the United States is on
track to become the world's leading exporter of liquefied natural gas within
five years provoked warnings that the American fracking boom could "end
hope for climate stability."
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is
primarily composed of methane, a greenhouse gas that is 84 times more potent
than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period. Methane emissions, by some estimates,
are responsible for about a quarter of human-caused global warming.
"Science confirms that
gas is a climate killer," Wenonah Hauter, executive director of the U.S.
advocacy group Food & Water Watch, said in a statement Friday, citing
methane's planet-warming potential.
Hauter's statement came in
response to an International Energy Agency (IEA) annual report, released Friday,
that featured the new projection about U.S. LNG exports. The IEA report states
that global demand for natural gas grew last year at the fastest rate in nearly
a decade and is expected to keep growing, "driven by strong consumption in
fast-growing Asian economies and supported by the continued development of the
international gas trade."
The IEA's new release came
just two days after Food & Water Watch published a
report which, as Hauter put it, "shows that the power, petrochemical, and
LNG export industries are propping up the fracked gas industry by manufacturing
bloated demand for its dirty product, all with the help of government subsidies
and intervention."
While the IEA report
attributes much of the increased demand to a growing number of natural gas
power plants in the United States and China, it also points to other
factors. U.S. News & World Report outlined the
agency's findings:
The industrial sector... also
played an outsized role in 2018, with factories, fabricators, and other
facilities using gas as both a fuel source and a feedstock to make plastics,
fertilizers, and other products—putting industry on track to account for nearly
half of global gas consumption by 2024.
The U.S., meanwhile, saw the
biggest jump in production last year since 1951, with output soaring by 11.5
percent. That made the U.S. the biggest contributor to gas production growth
around the world.
IEA executive director Fatih
Birol said in
a statement announcing the agency's report that "natural gas can
contribute to a cleaner global energy system. But it faces its own challenges,
including remaining price competitive in emerging markets and reducing methane
emissions along the natural gas supply chain."
Farhana Yamin, a climate
attorney and coordinator at the Extinction Rebellion, toldAgence
France-Presse, "Given that this polluting fuel can never be 'clean' and is
a key driver of climate chaos, the assertion that it can be part of the path to
cleaner energy is highly misleading."
Lorne Stockman, senior research
analyst at Oil Change International, also criticized the agency's position on
natural gas.
"When it comes to gas,
the IEA horse has blinkers on and is heading straight over the cliff of climate
disaster," he told AFP. "Gas is not clean, cheap, or necessary."
Food & Water Watch's
Hauter said, "The IEA's cheerleading of fracked natural gas as some type
of global climate solution is foolish and false."
"The time has come to end
the madness by ending artificial economic support for the fossil fuel industry,
and investing aggressively in truly clean, renewable energy sources like wind
and solar," she added. "The future of our planet depends on it."
The IEA report and subsequent
criticism followed a study about
methane emissions from the U.S. ammonia fertilizer industry published last week
in the peer-reviewed journal Elementa.
Researchers from Cornell
University and the Environmental Defense Fund used a Google Street View car
equipped with technology to measure methane emission to gather data from six
U.S. plants. They found that emissions were not only 100 times higher than the
fertilizer industry's self-reported estimate, but also exceeded the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimate for all industrial processes in
the country.
"We took one small
industry that most people have never heard of and found that its methane
emissions were three times higher than the EPA assumed was emitted by all
industrial production in the United States," John Albertson, study
co-author and Cornell professor of civil and environmental engineering, said in
a statement.
Noting methane's impact on
planetary warming, Albertson warned, "the presence of substantial
emissions or leaks anywhere along the supply chain could make natural gas a
more significant contributor to climate change than previously thought."
No comments:
Post a Comment