by Rob Urie
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/07/29/long-live-the-queen-of-chaos/
For those to whom this hasn’t
yet occurred, if Hillary Clinton is elected President she will be President.
The Democratic Party platform, Bernie Sanders’ program proposals and Mrs.
Clinton’s theorized move Left will be but distant memories. If Mrs. Clinton
brings with her a Democratic Congress (or not) she will use it to pass the TPP
and TTIP ‘trade’ agreements, to launch ‘liberal’ wars across the Middle East
and rattle sabers against Russia, she will re-launch the ‘Grand Bargain’ to cut
Social Security and Medicare under the pretext of a fiscal crisis and should
Wall Street falter, she will ‘hold her nose’ and once again bail out her
benefactors. This is the program her supporters are voting for.
By analogy, when Barack Obama
entered office with a Democratic Congress in 2009 he had the best opportunity
since the early 1930s to enact a new New Deal in favor of social justice and
against the forces of neoliberal militarism. After bailing out Wall Street and
institutionalizing the worst ‘unitary President’ excesses of the George W. Bush
administration Mr. Obama ran and won again in 2012 on the well-instantiated
delusion that once freed from having to run for office again he would be the
‘progressive’ his supporters always thought him to be. This despite his
self-description as a ‘moderate Republican’ and his actual record at the center
of the Democrats’ three decade turn to the political hard-right.
The Democratic Party line that
a vote for Green Party candidate Jill Stein or a write-in vote for Bernie
Sanders is a vote for Donald Trump overlooks that establishment Democrats
rigged the primary process in favor of Mrs. Clinton and that it is their
policies that are responsible for widespread political disaffection. The odds
have it that if a vote were taken to exile both Party establishments to poorly
provisioned outposts on Mars they would be on the way there now. What is so
frighteningly irresponsible about Mrs. Clinton’s insertion / assertion as the
Democratic Party candidate is the same problem posed by Barack Obama’s posture
as a ‘progressive’ President— it leaves the radical right as the only
alternative for disaffected voters.
Graph: prime-age employment—
jobs for those who must work to live, have been declining since 2000. Each
subsequent economic ‘recovery’ has proceeded from a lower, and more desperate,
base. Democrats had available to them the New Deal economic template to work
from. But they chose restoration of the unstable, destabilizing neoliberal
project instead. Source: St. Louis Federal Reserve.
The illusion of political
choice only works as long as the status quo functions in some basic sense. The
recurring financial bubbles from Savings and Loan deregulation (1980s),
privatization and equitization of government-funded research in the tech boom –
bust (late 1990s) and the housing boom – bust demonstrated the fleeting nature
of Wall Street fueled ‘prosperity.’ With the Middle Class on the ropes, the
working class all but disappeared and the poor desperately clinging to the few
crumbs that fall to them, the U.S. is but one recession away from being
economically (and politically) untenable. The only programs that Democrats
have— ‘free-trade,’ private debt fueled consumption, deregulation,
privatization and Wall Street bailouts, are proven losers for all but a few in
2016.
One of the reasons the
American political leadership needs foreign ‘enemies’ is to divert attention
away from the damage that nominal Americans do— Wall Street, corporate
executives, the NSA and carceral state, trade deals that act as firewalls
against social and environmental resolution and local government actors for
corporate power (ALEC-American Legislative Exchange Council). Another is the
‘business’ of nominal governance, the nexus of state and corporate interests
that promotes geopolitical tensions, fear and paranoia as business ventures
from which profits are earned through mass destruction (Vietnam, Iraq). As the
most despised candidate for U.S. President in recent history, Hillary Clinton
needs foreign enemies.
Flip the Democratic Party
script for a moment to consider that Vladimir Putin might have a point. Hillary
Clinton is the most dangerous person on the planet because she is a neoliberal
militarist who is absolutely immune from the consequences of the crises she
creates. Armed with nuclear weapons freshly ‘upgraded’ by Barack Obama, Mrs.
Clinton and the neocon cabal she hopes to lead have destroyed Iraq,
Afghanistan, Libya and Syria, have surrounded Russia with NATO troops and
weapons, staged a neo-fascist coup in Ukraine, supported a right-wing coup in
Honduras and have indicated their intentions to proceed apace turning entire
regions of the planet into chaotic rubble with body-counts already in the
millions.
This isn’t speculation about
some future state of affairs. Hillary Clinton sold U.S. sanctions against Iraq
in which one-half million of Iraq’s most vulnerable citizens were starved and
denied life-saving medicines to ‘teach Saddam Hussein a lesson.’ And the
Clinton-Bush war against Iraq cost one million more innocent lives and created
chaos across the Middle East. ISIS is a direct result of Clinton-Bush policies.
The liberal pretense that the U.S. War of Aggression against Iraq was ‘Bush’s
war’ requires overlooking the eight years of liberal bombing and sanctions that
preceded it and that Bill Clinton gave Mr. Bush political cover for the war as
his wife voted for it. The U.S. war against Iraq— catastrophe that it was / is,
was as bi-partisan as they come.
The system that Mrs. Clinton
and Donald Trump— past friends who attend each other’s public functions and
private affairs and whose children thrive together in the closed lootocracy of
officialdom, are vying against one another to ‘lead’ a spoils system where
‘leadership’ means the ability to arrange profitable outcomes for private interests
through ‘public’ means. Neoliberal militarism is private profits created
through public death, destruction and misery. The profits explain why Hillary
Clinton is never held to account for deadly sanctions, gratuitous wars that
turn into geopolitical catastrophes, social policies that turned the poorest
40% of the country into a beggar class and racist strategies like mass
incarceration to divide the working class. Given her actual record, Black
support for Mrs. Clinton is akin to choosing between AIDS and cancer.
Americans exhibit near-heroic
aversion to history and the consequences of American policies that now
constitute the core of the Democratic Party’s domestic agenda. The IMF has been
pushing these policies on ‘client’ (victim) states for the last half-century.
The capitalist lootocracy that the Democrats (and Republicans) serve has long
installed puppet governments to reign with impunity as long as they deliver
local wealth to back ‘up’ to it. The Clintons are corrupt puppets who serve
this system of un-enlightened self-interest as domestic agents of international
capital. The sooner the youth of America and the residual Left realize that
there is no hope for a better, or even livable, future through establishment
politics the sooner we can get to the task at hand: a (real) political
revolution.
The title of this piece is
taken from Diana Johnstone’s book Queen of Chaos.
No comments:
Post a Comment