Posted on July 18, 2016 by Yves
Smith
Yves here. I’m late to reading
the underlying report, Overcharged: The High Cost of High Finance, and so am
starting with the overview by its lead author, Jerry Epstein.
Epstein flags private equity
as the epitome of how the financial services industry has become extractive,
but there are plenty of other examples that readers can no doubt cite, such as
our high charges for debit and credit cards, both of which run on antiquated
infrastructure, and all of the “gotcha” charges that still exist for retail
products like checking accounts and consumer loans, even after the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau has gone after some of the worst of them.
Be sure to read this short
post. You’ll see the excessive costs of our rent-seeking financial services
industry are staggering.
By Gerald Epstein, Professor
of Economics and a founding Co-Director of the Political Economy Research
Institute (PERI) at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Originally
published at Triple Crisis
A healthy financial system is
crucial to a stable and productive market economy. But after decades of
deregulation, the U.S. financial system has turned into a highly speculative
system that has failed spectacularly at doing its job. My new report, “Overcharged: The High Cost of High Finance,” written with
Juan Montecino and published by the Roosevelt Institute, describes in detail
the massive costs of this failed financial system.
The evidence of overcharging
is all around us. The most obvious, of course, is the catastrophic financial
crisis of 2007-2008 that wiped away $16 trillion—24 percent of household net
wealth, led to more than 5.5 million home foreclosures, and caused
skyrocketing, hope-crushing unemployment rates. When the government picked up
the pieces and committed more than $20 trillion of taxpayers’ money to bail out
the largest financial institutions, millions of Americans were left high and
dry, angry and frustrated.
But the failures of our
financial system don’t just arrive in one big bang. They occur on a daily
basis, in more mundane ways, often hidden from sight. Asset managers overcharge
and underperform. Private equity (PE) general partners earn massive incomes but
pay low returns to pension funds and other investors while enjoying
unjustifiable tax breaks such as the carried interest exclusion. They do this
while, at times, breaking companies and laying off workers for no other reason
than their pursuit of short-run capital gains. Payday lenders charge upwards of
400 percent annual interest because many poor people have nowhere else to turn.
Meanwhile, many of these payday lenders themselves are tied to the major Wall
Street banks.
Overcharging Americans means
overpaying bankers. A recent Financial
Times study found that, in 2015, average annual pay for top Wall Street
CEOs jumped by 10 percent to $20.7 million, twice as high as their European
counterparts (who, by the way, still earn a pretty farthing). And it is not
just those at the top who are overpaid. Sarah Andersen of the Institute
for Policy Study showed that in 2014, total U.S. banker bonuses were more
than twice as high as the earnings of all U.S. workers who worked full time at
the minimum wage.
Overpaying finance leads to
the misallocation of talent and financial resources. Many of the best- educated
college graduates want to get a job on Wall Street rather than in more socially
beneficial jobs as researchers, teachers, managers, or entrepreneurs. And the
search for short-term opportunities to overcharge draws more and more of the
nation’s financial capital into financial speculation and out of more
productive sectors.
How much does this
overcharging cost the American people? In the first attempt to add up the tab,
Juan Montecino and I did the math. In “Overcharged: The High Cost of High Finance,” we divided
the cost of high finance into three components:
Rents, or excess pay and
profits going to bankers, over and above what similarly skilled and productive
workers and firms in other industries would get
Misallocation costs, or the
costs of diverting resources into high finance and away from more productive
sectors of the economy
The costs of the great
financial crisis that started in 2007–2008
We found that, between 1990
and 2005, excess profits and pay amounted to $3.6–$4.2 trillion and the
misallocation of human and financial resources, which lowered U.S. economic
growth, cost the U.S. economy between $2.6 trillion and $3.9 trillion, all in
inflation-adjusted dollars. Together, these “everyday” costs of high finance
amounted to between $6.3 trillion and $8.2 trillion between 1990 and 2005.
Adding conservative estimates
by the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank of the expected costs of the
great financial crisis (measured from 2008 to 2023), which amount to between
$6.5 trillion and $14.5 trillion, we get a total cost of between $12.9 trillion
and $22.7 trillion. This amounts to between $40,000 and $70,000 for every man,
woman, and child in the U.S., or between $105,000 and $184,000 for the typical
American family. Without this loss, the typical American household would have
doubled its wealth at retirement.
Given this high cost, we would
expect Congress to try to protect the Dodd-Frank financial regulations or even
implement a new Glass-Steagall Act to break up the big banks. But instead, the
Republican controlled Congress continues to push legislation to defund the
regulatory agencies, gut Dodd-Frank, and deliver more profits and bonuses to
the bankers. The latest example is the so-called “Financial CHOICE Act,” which,
by trying to repeal Dodd-Frank and roll back prior regulations, would,
according to Americans For Financial Reform, “expose consumers,
investors and the public to greatly heightened risk of abuse in their regular
dealings with the financial system, and our economy as a whole to heightened
risk of instability and crisis.”
For the bankers and the politicians
they pay off with campaign contributions, big rents are at stake. But for the
rest of us, the costs are much, much higher. We can’t afford to let Wall Street
overcharge us even more.
No comments:
Post a Comment