by Ben Geier
http://fortune.com/2016/05/06/heres-how-donald-trump-can-win-in-november/
It will likely come down to
the Rust Belt and the Midwest.
Donald Trump is up against
what seems like tremendous odds to capture the presidency this fall. After romping
through the primaries and discarding his rivals one by one, he is now poised to
go mano a mano with Hillary Clinton, and most polls point towards a Clinton
rout.
But Democrats shouldn’t be too
confident, and Donald Trump fans should not feel like there’s no hope. By
tweaking the electoral strategy used by Republican candidates for the past four
election cycles, Trump has a legitimate chance at transforming the electoral
map and catapulting himself into the White House. Put simply, Trump will need
to zero in on the Rust Belt and parts of the Midwest. To pull that off, he’ll
need to turn several historically blue presidential election states red.
Since 2000, five states have
been critical to Republican presidential strategy: Florida, Ohio, Nevada,
Colorado, and New Mexico. The first four have voted twice for Republicans and
twice for Democrats. New Mexico went for the Democratic candidate in every
presidential election since 2000 except 2004.
But when the GOP did well in
those five states, they won the presidential race. It put George W. Bush in the
White House for two terms. Those states are important to Democratic candidates,
too. President Obama won all five of those states, twice. And if Mitt Romney
had won those five states, he would have unseated Obama.
To win these crucial states,
Republicans have historically tried to appeal to the Hispanic community and
young voters. It’s been an uphill battle for most Republicans, and it certainly
wouldn’t be an easy feat for Trump. He is mostly loathed by Hispanic voters,
and he will face a challenge getting through to young voters outside of his key
demographic of lower-income, less educated white people.
To win, Trump will need to put
the previous GOP strategy aside. Instead, he may look to keep Ohio in the mix
and then set his gaze on the remainder of the Rust Belt and the Midwest:
Michigan, Pennsylvania, Iowa, Missouri, and Wisconsin.
In the Midwest, “you have this
grouping of blue collar, middle income households,” says John Brabender, a
Republican strategist who has been viewed as the architect of Pennsylvanian
Republican Rick Santorum’s career. Brabender notes that in Ohio specifically, a
large number of conservative voters didn’t show up to the polls for Mitt Romney
in 2012.
Turning those states—almost
all of which have voted for Democrats in every presidential election since 1992
(except for Iowa, which went for Bush in 2004, and classic bellwether
Missouri)—into Republican wins won’t be easy. But primary election exit polls
from those states this election cycle suggest that it’s not out of the
question.
Michigan (16 Electoral Votes)
With its strong base of
working class and union workers, Michigan has been a Democratic presidential
election stronghold since the 1990s. But the exit polls from both parties’
primary races this year suggest that Trump has a shot at turning the state red.
In the exit poll after the Democratic Primary, which was won by Bernie Sanders,
57% said that trade deals take away jobs from Americans. In the Republican
Primary, 55% of those polled felt the same way.
Hillary Clinton is painted as
a pro-NAFTA free-trader, largely because of the policies of her husband’s
administration. Trump, meanwhile, has based most of his Midwest campaign on
being against trade agreements like NAFTA.
Then there is the fact that,
among Democratic voters in Michigan, 69% of those polled said they were either
“dissatisfied” or “angry” with the federal government. And 34% said they would
not be satisfied if Clinton won the nomination. Brabender says Trump may be
able to pick up Bernie Sanders voters — not the young progressive part of his
coalition, but the populist part that allowed him to win the Michigan primary.
Ohio (18 Electoral Votes)
Trump’s strong stance against
free trade could help him make his case to Ohio voters. Democratic primary exit
polls found 53% of people believed that free trade deals killed American jobs.
Polls found 54% of Republican primary voters believed the same thing.
Pennsylvania (20 Electoral
Votes)
Pennsylvania could be Trump’s
most difficult target. Though it has a large rural population in the middle of
the state, the urban Democratic strongholds in Pittsburgh and Philadelphia have
kept the state blue during presidential elections over the past two decades.
In exit polls, only 42% of
polled Democratic primary voters said that free trade costs American jobs,
compared with 44% who believe it creates job. In exit polls on the Republican
side, 53% believe trade takes away jobs.
Wisconsin (10 Electoral Votes)
Wisconsin has fewer electoral
votes than the others we have discussed, but it could still prove critical to
the 2016 election. Again, the Democratic numbers aren’t encouraging, with just
42% of those polled believing trade takes away jobs. Exit polling data wasn’t
available for the Republican primary in the Badger State.
Another problem for Trump in
Wisconsin: he lost the primary to Ted Cruz. During the primary, Republican
Governor Scott Walker actively supported Cruz’s candidacy. Trump does not need
to worry about Walker
breaking for Clinton.
—
Missouri, with 10 electoral
votes, and Iowa with 6, are both more traditional swing states. Trump will have
to appeal to the religious voters in both, something he didn’t have much of a
struggle with in the primaries.
So, here is how the map could
look for Trump if he turns the Midwest and the Rust Belt for the GOP:
This leaves three swing
states: Virginia, North Carolina, and New Hampshire. And Brabender says that
Trump might have a shot in Florida — it is a heterogeneous state and it does
have a lot of former New Yorkers who could be drawn to Trump. If Trump manages
to win in the Rust Belt and the Midwest, he’ll only need to win one of the
in-play Southern states mentioned above to take the White House.
No comments:
Post a Comment