SEP 18, 2019
Jill Richardson
A few years ago, I had a
cupcake problem. I’d go to the cupcake store almost daily and I’d eat at least
one cupcake, sometimes more.
At the same time, I wanted to
lose weight, or at least stop gaining it. So I kept looking up information
about diets and superfoods, just looking for some magical solution to present
itself.
Something like: “The key to
weight loss is eating large quantities of parsley every day.” Or turmeric,
maybe? Ginger? Garlic? Finally, I realized, there is no magical fix. The
problem was the cupcakes.
It’s tempting to look for easy
ways to fix big problems by trimming around the edges to avoid making the real
changes you don’t want to make. Tempting, but not feasible.
That’s similar to what
presidential hopeful Elizabeth
Warren just said about fixing climate change. She was asked about her
position on small changes like banning plastic drinking straws or inefficient
light bulbs.
“Give me a break,” she
said. “This is exactly what the fossil fuel industry wants us to talk
about… They want to be able to stir up a lot of controversy around your
lightbulbs, around your straws” when “70 percent of the pollution” comes from
“the building industry, the electric power industry, and the oil industry.”
Like my cupcakes, those three
industries are the real problem. Banning straws while leaving those three
industries in place will make about as much of a dent in the climate as eating
two cups of parsley a day while continuing my cupcake habit would have made in
my waistline: Not much.
My cupcake habit was a
problem, but it was also a symptom of a larger problem. In the end, I got
therapy for difficult feelings I was dealing with. Once I took care of my
mental health, the emotional eating stopped, and I lost 30 pounds.
Carbon pollution is also a
problem as well as a symptom of a larger problem. As Warren pointed out, fossil
fuel companies exert too much influence on Washington, preventing us from
regulating them in the ways we need to save our climate.
They also hire public
relations firms to dupe the public into doubting that the climate crisis is
caused by humans — or at least, not by them — and to convince us not to
regulate them in a way that would save the planet but cost them money.
We should be looking for
win-win solutions to the climate crisis: solutions that create jobs and
preserve quality of life and individual freedoms while simultaneously reducing
carbon emissions.
In order to do that, we need
to curb the corrupt influence of polluting industries that are profiting off of
carbon emissions while harming the future of our planet. And, when they try to
distract us with light bulbs and drinking straws, we can’t allow ourselves to
be fooled.
No comments:
Post a Comment