Tim Radford
Urgent action on climate
change will be costly. But inaction could be four
or five times more expensive, according to new climate accounting: extremes
of global heat are on the increase.
Submarine heatwaves happen
three times more often that they did in 1980. Ocean warming events can
devastate coral reefs and trigger even more damage from more intense
acidification and oxygen loss in the seas, with disastrous consequences for
fishery and seafood.
The ecosystems on which all
living things – including humans – depend are shifting away from the tropics at
up to 40kms a year. Extremes of torrential rainfall, drought and tropical
cyclones are becoming measurably more intense.
And all this has happened
because global mean surface temperatures have risen in the last century by
about 1°C, thanks to ever more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, a consequence
of profligate use of fossil fuels to drive human expansion.
Forecasts suggest humans could
tip the planet to a rise of 1.5°C as early as 2030. This is the
limit proposed by 195 nations in Paris in 2015 when they promised to
keep global heating to “well below” 2°C by the end of the century.
And now researchers once again
warn in the journal Science that
even the seemingly small gap between 1.5°C and 2°C could spell a colossal
difference in long-term outcomes. Right now, the planet is on track to hit or
surpass 3°C by 2100. The case for drastic reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions is now more compelling and urgent than ever.
“First, we have
under-estimated the sensitivity of natural and human systems to climate change
and the speed at which these things are happening. Second, we have
under-appreciated the synergistic nature of climate threats – with outcomes
tending to be worse than the sum of the parts,” said Ove Hoegh-Goldberg of the
University of Queensland in Australia, who led the study.
“This is resulting in rapid
and comprehensive climate impacts, with growing damage to people, ecosystems
and livelihoods.”
Harder to forecast
And Daniela
Jacob, who directs Germany’s Climate Service Centre, added: “We are already
in new territory. The ‘novelty’ of the weather is making our ability to
forecast and respond to weather-related phenomena very difficult.”
The two scientists were part
of a much larger world-wide team of researchers who looked at the risks that
arrive with rapid change: damage to forests, farms and wildlife; to coastal
communities as sea levels rise and storms multiply.
Their message is clear. There
would be huge benefits to containing average global temperature rise to no more
than 1.5C above the long-term average for most of human history.
“This is not an academic
issue, it is a matter of life and death for people everywhere.” said Michael Taylor,
dean of science at the University of the West Indies in Jamaica.
Weak commitments
“That said, people from small
island states and low-lying countries are in the immediate crosshairs of
climate change. I am very concerned about the future for these people.”
So far, the commitments made
by most nations are simply too feeble. That risks condemning many nations to
chaos and harm, and, as usual, those most vulnerable would be the poorest.
“To avoid this, we must
accelerate action and tighten emission reduction targets so that they fall in
line with the Paris Agreement. As we show, this is much less costly than
suffering the impacts of 2°C or more of climate change,” said Professor
Hoegh-Goldberg.
“Tackling climate change is a
tall order. However, there is no alternative from the perspective of human
well-being − and too much at stake not to act urgently on this issue.”
No comments:
Post a Comment