"Amazing what a little
bold leadership can do."
Progressives celebrated a
"huge
landmark" in the fight for a humane healthcare system in the United
States after news broke Thursday that a majority of the House Democratic
caucus has
signed on to the comprehensive and bold Medicare
for All Act of 2019.
"Medicare for All is now
the official Democratic Party position in the U.S. House, as the legislation
now has 118 sponsors—an official majority of the House Democratic
caucus," tweeted David
Sirota, speechwriter for Sen. Bernie Sanders, a 2020 Democratic presidential
candidate and the lead sponsor of the Medicare for All Act in the Senate.
"This is a huge
deal," tweeted activist
Shaun King.
Single-payer advocates
applauded both the persistent
grassroots organizing by nurses and others and the leadership of
Sanders and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—the lead sponsor of the Medicare for
All Act in the House—for making the achievement possible.
The milestone comes after
Medicare for All featured
prominently during both nights of the 2020 Democratic presidential
debates in Detroit this week.
Sanders and Sen. Elizabeth
Warren (D-Mass.) made forceful arguments in support of Medicare for All in the
face of attacks from right-wing Democrats and disingenuous
questions by CNN moderators.
In an op-ed for
the Washington Post Thursday, Jayapal hit back at Democratic
opponents of Medicare for All, accusing them of distorting the facts and
"using one-liners from industry front groups and Republican
playbooks."
"As the debates continue,
I hope that my fellow Democrats will take a good look at our bill and get the
facts right," wrote Jayapal. "The Medicare for All movement has
overwhelming public support, unprecedented grassroots organization, and a
serious plan that is ready to change our healthcare system right now."
As Common Dreams reported Wednesday,
Jayapal expressed her frustration with fellow Democrats who she said are using
the Medicare for All label, which has widespread appeal, to push plans that
fall far short of the fundamental goals and principles of Medicare for All.
Though she didn't mention Sen.
Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) by name, Jayapal's criticism appeared to be directed
at the California Democrat's healthcare
plan, which would preserve a significant role for private insurance.
"For-profit industry does
not have a role in determining one's right to healthcare," Jayapal
tweeted. "Anything less is not Medicare for All."
In her Washington Post op-ed,
Jayapal also took aim at other half-measures "such as a public
option," which "might sound appealing but would still leave more than
10 million people without coverage while keeping in place a costly
private-insurance middleman that eats up 25 to 30 percent in administrative
waste and profits."
"If we want to achieve
true universal healthcare while containing costs," Jayapal wrote,
"Medicare for All is the only answer."
No comments:
Post a Comment