by Slavoj Zizek
The UK’s decision to extradite
WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange to the US should be taken as a warning to
all liberals who still have any faith in ‘American liberal democracy,’ says
cultural philosopher Slavoj Zizek.
The Slovenian sociologist told
RT that signing of the extradition order is just one of two recent events that
really worry him. The other “ominous” event was the Ecuadorian
government’s invitation to US authorities to take possession of Assange’s
property from its London embassy when he was taken to prison, including book
manuscripts, computers and other personal possessions.
“The nightmare is that the
accuser was directly invited to take possession of all these documents. This
breaks even the elementary the norms of legality,” Zizek explained.
“The message is, ‘Yes, we will
be brutal beyond measure.’”
Zizek drew particular
attention to the sheer brutality of the coordinated effort against the
whistleblower after he exposed the US government and military’s gross misdeeds.
“It’s always an ominous signal
when measures against a threatened individual are done in such a directly
brutal way that this very brutality means something,” he said.
The philosopher added that he
is “radically opposed” to US President Donald Trump, but noted the
peculiar situation where the anti-Trump “liberal center” in US
politics is harsher on Assange than the Trump administration because, in his
estimation at least, “they think Assange helped Trump get elected.”
Zizek also railed against
so-called liberals back across the pond in the UK arguing that “those in
the UK who are most fervent advocates of Assange’s extradition, are not
conservatives but more centrist Blairite wing of the Labour Party.”
“We should ask ourselves: What
went wrong in the liberal center itself that something like Trump could
appear?”
There is just as much blood on
liberals’ hands as those whom they oppose when it comes to the abuses of the
military industrial complex, he argues.
However, he does believe that
Assange’s high-profile persecution may eventually serve as a call to mobilize
for advocates of freedom of the press, but also fears a cultural ennui in the
face of such widespread and egregious abuse of power.
“The public will become more
and more aware of the non-transparency. Among other things, this is one of the
great achievements of WikiLeaks. We became aware of how things are,” Zizek
said.
“What really worries me is the
inertia of the wider public; they are aware and yet they don’t really care
about it.”
No comments:
Post a Comment