October 11 2016
EXCERPTS OF HILLARY CLINTON’S previously
secret speeches to big banks and trade groups in 2013 and 2014 show her
exalting the work of her hosts, hardly a surprise when these groups paid her up
to $225,000 an hour to chat them up.
Far from chiding Goldman Sachs
for obstructing Democratic proposals for financial reform, Clinton appeared to
sympathize with the giant investment bank. At a Goldman Sachs Alternative
Investments Symposium in October 2013, Clinton almost apologized for the
Dodd-Frank reform bill, explaining that it had to pass “for political reasons,”
because “if you were an elected member of Congress and people in your
constituency were losing jobs and shutting businesses and everybody in the
press is saying it’s all the fault of Wall Street, you can’t sit idly by and do
nothing.”
Clinton added, “And I think
the jury is still out on that because it was very difficult to sort of sort
through it all.”
Clinton praised Deutsche Bank
in a 2014 speech for “the work that the Bank has done in New York City on
affordable housing.”
While Deutsche Bank has given
to anti-homelessness campaigns in the past, it was also cited in
a New York State Senate report in January for refusing to maintain foreclosed
properties in New York City neighborhoods and costing those communities
millions in unpaid fines. Deutsche is also about to face amulti-billion-dollar
penalty from the Justice Department for defrauding investors with
low-quality mortgage securities, leading to the housing meltdown.
Those excerpts were among many
listed in an 80-page document prepared
by the Clinton campaign, listing potentially damaging quotes from the
Democratic nominee’s paid but at that point still secret speeches. The report
landed in campaign chairman John Podesta’s email, which was hacked, and then posted by WikiLeaks
last week.
In a November 2013 speech to
the National Association of Realtors (NAR), Clinton pronounced herself proud to
work with the trade group as a U.S. senator to “look for ways to help families
facing foreclosure with concrete steps.”
NAR represents real estate
agents, who had no authority to assist distressed homeowners. An April 2007 document lists
NAR’s priorities in foreclosure mitigation, and they were able to get an
amendment exempting mortgage debt forgiveness from being treated as earned
income. But the rest amount to “urging” and “supporting” efforts to help
homeowners that never happened.
Clinton has historically been
far less critical of the revolving door between Wall Street and Washington than
many other Democrats, and as secretary of state allowed two of her top aides —
Tom Nides and Robert Hormats — to receive big payouts from their big-bank
employers before entering public service.
“Thank you for lending me Tom
Nides for the past two years,” Clinton said to a crowd at Morgan Stanley on
April 18, 2013.
As The
Intercept reported in July 2015, Nides moved from chief operating
officer at Morgan Stanley into Clinton’s State Department, and when Clinton
left Foggy Bottom, Nideswent
right back to Morgan Stanley as a vice chairman.
Clinton joked about the
“culture shock” for Nides, working a government job. “You should have seen his
face when he learned there were no stock options at the State Department.
But he soon not only settled
in very nicely, he became positively enthusiastic when I told him we did have
our own plane.”
Clinton also gushed about
Hormats, who joined her at State after a career at Goldman Sachs, in a 2014
speech at JPMorgan Chase.
In excerpts that got
some attention last week, Clinton told bankers that financial reform
“really has to come from the industry itself,” that “the people that know the
industry better than anybody are the people who work in the industry,” and that
blaming banks for the crisis was “an oversimplification.”
Her former Democratic
presidential rival, Bernie Sanders responded
in a statement, “Whatever Secretary Clinton may or may not have said behind
closed doors on Wall Street, I am determined to implement the agenda of the
Democratic Party platform which was agreed upon by her campaign,” and which
“calls for breaking up the largest financial institutions in this country,
re-establishing Glass-Steagall and prosecuting those many Wall Street CEOs who
engaged in illegal behavior.”
The excerpts reveal that
Clinton, when speaking to the financial industry, adopted their mindset and
privileged their arguments. The question that arises is whether members of a possible
Clinton administration will reflect this worldview, or whether the long primary
with Sanders has made that untenable. Some aggressive advocates for progressive
appointments believe the latter.
“At State and on the speaking
circuit, Clinton was in an environment that encouraged her to view Wall Street
bankers as fonts of economic wisdom,” said Jeff Hauser, Director of the
Revolving Door Project. “But after 15 months running against a progressive
populist like Sanders, Clinton knows that government conducted a by rotating
stream of bankers is politically unacceptable.”
No comments:
Post a Comment