Posted on
Apr 16, 2016
By Joe Conason
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/on_israel_sanders_is_right_and_clinton_knows_it_20160416
The most significant moment of
the Democratic primary debate in Brooklyn—and perhaps any presidential debate
this season—came when Bernie Sanders challenged Hillary Clinton over her
refusal to criticize Israel’s excessive use of force against the Palestinians
in Gaza. For the first time in memory, a major American political figure
insisted publicly that the Jewish state and its leaders are “not always
right”—and that in attempting to suppress terrorism, they had killed and
injured far too many blameless human beings.
Asked by CNN’s Wolf Blitzer
about his judgment that Israel’s military response to attacks from Gaza in 2014
was “disproportionate and led to the unnecessary loss of innocent life,” the
Vermont Senator answered firmly: “Yeah, I do believe that.” He mentioned that
many other nations, including longtime allies of Israel, had denounced the
atrocities in Gaza, along with human rights organizations around the world.
Having reiterated that he
supports Israel as our ally—with every right to self-defense—Sanders said that
“in the long run, if we are ever going to bring peace to that region which has
seen so much hatred and so much war, we are going to have to treat the
Palestinian people with respect and dignity.”
That should be blindingly
obvious, especially to Clinton, who has worked alongside President Clinton and
President Obama toward a decent two-state solution for almost a quarter
century. Her disappointing reply to Sanders reflected her political priorities
in the New York primary, rather than her commitment to human rights or her
assessment of American diplomatic interests.
She talked about her effort in
negotiating a Gaza ceasefire, but that self-serving paean was evasive, as
Sanders pointed out. Pressed for a serious answer, she pandered to the most conservative
voters, Jewish and Christian, who mistakenly believe friendship with Israel
means supporting any violence perpetrated by Israel’s government. She blamed
the casualties among Palestinian civilians solely on Hamas, even as she vaguely
mentioned “precautions” that Israel should have taken to prevent them.
This display of subservience
to the most right-wing elements in Israel and its Washington lobby was all too
typical of American presidential aspirants. Rarely does any U.S. politician
dare to utter the truth about the conflict in Israel and Palestine. But coming
from Clinton the usual pap sounds worse because, unlike the average pol, she
possesses deep knowledge of the region.
When Bill Clinton was
president, he and Hillary became close friends of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin,
a former general in the Israel Defense Forces and a war hero who courageously
sought a just peace with the Palestinians—and paid for that brave policy with
his life when a right-wing fanatic assassinated him in November 1995. Her
memoir, “Living History,” describes hopeful moments with Rabin and his wife
Leah around the time of the Oslo accords—and an affecting account of the
moments after President Clinton, who loved Rabin like a father, told her he had
been murdered.
Hillary Clinton knows that the
right-wing government of Benjamin Netanyahu, responsible for the Gaza disgrace
and more, is far closer in outlook to the ultra-nationalists who applauded
Rabin’s assassination than to the peacemaker whose death she lamented. She knows
that Netanyahu’s aim is annexation, not negotiation. She knows that our
interests—indeed, those of the entire world—can only be advanced by a just
peace that both protects Israel and relieves the suffering of the Palestinian
people.
The day after the Brooklyn
debate, her campaign issued a lengthy press release: “Hillary Clinton and
Israel: A 30-Year Record of Friendship, Leadership, and Strength.” But its
failure to mention Palestinian rights and needs again revealed weakness, not
“strength.” We can only hope that if she wins the presidency, she will prove
herself to be a true friend of Israel and its people—as her husband did when he
warned that unless they achieve a durable agreement with a new Palestine,
Israelis will eventually lose their nationhood, their democracy, or both.
Unfortunately, Clinton’s
current approach is the dismal standard in American politics, which made
Sanders’ honesty even more refreshing. What a surprise to hear a Jewish
candidate for president—the first with a realistic shot at his party’s
nomination—speak so candidly and courageously about the country where he worked
on a kibbutz as a young man. With those words Bernie made a bit of history, and
earned a lot of respect.
To find out more about Joe
Conason and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists,
visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment