Saturday, February 13, 2016

10 reasons why voters are turning to Bernie Sanders








While it’s still early days in the primary season, Bernie Sanders’ victory over Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire has raised hopes among his supporters that the veteran Democratic socialist could be the party’s presidential candidate come November.


Last week, in the wake of the Iowa caucuses, we asked our readers in the US to tell us who their preferred Democratic candidate would be. We received a staggering number of responses: over 12,000, in just a few days. The overwhelming majority told us they were backing Sanders.


Unsurprising, perhaps. Given our readership, it was expected that Sanders would get a strong showing in such a call-out. But the sheer strength of feeling and heartfelt responses reminded us of when we asked our readers about another unlikely candidate: the British Labour party’s Jeremy Corbyn.


Readers flocking to Sanders’ burgeoning campaign rallies found their way to our own inboxes. Reading through the thousands of responses, which came from all States and from people of varied backgrounds and ages, certain phrases and arguments repeated themselves many times. “He’s the last chance to change our country.” “We need a revolution, and he’s the only one that offers something different.” He is “authentic”, has “integrity” and isn’t “owned by Wall Street”.


Here are 10 reasons our readers gave for supporting Sanders over Clinton.

1) He’s seen as a challenge to the status quo...

What came through loud and clear was the fury at mainstream American politics, echoing the populist support for (the really rather different) Donald Trump on the Republican side. Sanders appeals to those who feel the entire democratic system has broken down.
Sanders is representing my interests. For decades American politics have been a sham, elections bought and paid for by special interests and corporations. They have wrecked the environment, caused the biggest financial crisis in history and are using their deep pockets and for profit agendas to marginalize people’s needs even further.

Shaz Plunkett, Los Angeles CA


2) ... whereas Clinton is viewed as more of the same

Clinton paints herself as the pragmatist who gets things done, but after New Hampshire she may need to further emphasise her progressive credentials if she’s going to win over those turning to Sanders.

I have no grudge with Hillary Clinton, but she had her chance eight years ago. She is old news, with plenty of controversy, baggage and history that will bring out Republicans in droves to vote against her.

Steve Guion, Fairfax, Virginia


3) Sanders’ consistency is judged a virtue

The phrase ‘flip-flopping’ may bring back memories of John Kerry’s doomed presidential campaign in 2004, but our readers were keen to attach it to Clinton. The consistency of Sanders’ views was seen as a major plus.

I’m tired of the rich getting richer, and having to work harder for less. I saw my parents lose so much of their retirement in the Wall Street crash and no one on Wall Street paid for that. My college education has done me no good but I still have student loans, and none of my kids were able to attend college because of the recession. We deserve change in this country, from someone who has consistently fought that fight.

Danielle Banz, Monroe, Washington

 

4) They’re suspicious of Clinton’s ties with Wall Street

Sanders has made plenty of capital – if you’ll excuse the pun – from emphasising Clinton’s close ties with Wall Street. It’s an attack line we’re bound to see repeated in future debates.
Sanders is the only candidate who prioritizes campaign finance reform. Hillary Clinton is one of the biggest beneficiaries of our current broken system, and has no reason to change it. If she wins it will be because of Wall Street money. I can’t vote for that.

Walker Bragman, East Hampton, New York


5) They’re demanding ‘revolutionary’ change...

Clinton has aimed to paint Sanders’ pitch to the nation as unrealistic, but there was a real sense of exhaustion with triangulation and incremental change.

He is the only candidate that is standing for poor and middle income people. With the constant attacks on our pensions, our unions, our health care, our public schools, etc, Bernie is the only candidate that is promising to do something for us: free college, reduction in student loans, health care for all, etc. In addition, he is honest and is refusing to accept corporate or billionaire donations to his campaign

Jannike Johnsen, Washington state


6) ... and they think it’s too late for baby steps

Again echoing Trump’s rhetoric, albeit from a very different political viewpoint, were the readers who felt this is the best chance for a generation to instigate serious change at the top. What Clinton dismisses as unrealistic, Sanders voters view as the last chance for America.

Money in politics, income inequality, $15 minimum wage, free college, breaking up the banks, holding Wall Street accountable, reforming the criminal justice system: Bernie has vision and is engaging us in the hard work that needs to be done to achieve this progressive agenda, which the Clinton Democrats have tried to convince us is impossible. Nothing is impossible if we come together and demand change. Bernie knows that and the time has come for democratic socialists to share a our vision for our future that will benefit all Americans.

Tenaya Wallace, Los Angeles, California


7) Climate change is an existential threat

And talking of the urgent need for change, our readers felt no issue is more stark than that of climate change – and that Sanders is the only candidate prepared to tackle it.

I believe that climate change is the worst long-term threat we face and that we must work to combat it by increasing our alternative energy sources.

Sidney Bennett, Nashville Tennessee




A Bernie Sanders supporter arrives with campaign posters outside the town hall as local residents vote for the first US presidential primary in Canterbury, New Hampshire. Photograph: Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Images


8) It’s not just about the millenials

We heard from a wide range of Sanders’ backers, from teenagers to octonogenarians. The 
older voters in particular were keen to emphasise his popularity across the age spectrum.

For many, this is their first foray into politics, the first time they are getting behind a candidate. They’re excited and horrified as they see “I campaign politics as usual”. The people who admonish them forget what it was like when they were that age and their zeal and determination helped to bring about the end of the Vietnam war. And despite what you see on TV or read in the paper, it isn’t only young people supporting Bernie. The media portrays it that way, but it’s much bigger than that. I’m one of Bernie’s older supporters. There are a lot of us too.

Laura Veralli, New York


9) They see him as a conduit for change rather than a miracle worker

Our readers were keen to emphasise that for Sanders to succeed, it would take a genuine democratic popular movement and grassroots organisation on a huge scale – something that needs to happen now in order to maintain the momentum of his campaign.

Sanders energizes people to get involved. He admits that even as President, nothing will change if the people of the United States don’t get involved to demand change

Jill Kapson, Chicago, Illinois


10) They’re angry as hell

Amid the hope and optimism that Sanders could lead America to a better future, there was much frustration at the iniquities of the US system and the inability of generations of leaders – including Obama – to affect any kind of meaningful change. From NSA surveillance to the bailing out of the banks, Sanders’ campaign is fuelled by plenty of anger.

I became disillusioned with politics watching Nixon go down when I was 16 and discussing it in civics class. The first vote I ever cast was for Jimmy Carter two years later – a man whose personal integrity has been evident to this day. My young hopes and idealism were crushed when he was not reelected. Ever since, I have been forced to choose the lesser of two evils time and time again.

I am no fool. I know that his proposals will be extremely hard to bring about. But I have been waiting all my adult life for another politician with personal integrity, who walks the talk.

Debra Vogel, Frederick, Maryland



struggling together against a common enemy




















Erica Garner endorsement of Bernie Sanders for President



















Friday, February 12, 2016

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

While Mega-Donors Average $1,950,000... Average Sanders Donation Still Just $27








http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/02/08/while-mega-donors-average-1950000-average-sanders-donation-still-just-27



Billionaires are dominating 2016 spending, but Bernie supporters are proving that small donors can fuel national campaign




Thousands of people gather to hear Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., during a campaign rally at the Prince William County Fairground, Sept. 14, 2015 in Manassas, Virginia. (Photo: Getty Images)
As comedian Larry David reminded Saturday Night Live viewers over the weekend, many people by now know how proud the Bernie Sanders campaign is for having built its entire campaign through a record-breaking 3.5 million individual donations, mostly from small donors averaging gifts of about $27, while refusing the support of super PAC contributions.


Meanwhile, according to a new independent analysis of campaign finance data published Monday by Politico, the 100 biggest spenders during this campaign season—many of them individual billionaires—have donated a combined $195 million to super PACs supporting the other presidential candidates.


The math is easy, but compared to the average donation celebrated by Sanders, the contrast is stark: $27 vs. $1,950,000. 


As the news outlet notes, these 100 top donors have given significantly more than "the $155 million spent by the two million smallest donors combined." 


This disparity exemplifies exactly what Sanders and other critics of the current campaign finance system mean when they describe how a "rigged economy"—which has created such an unequal distribution of wealth—is also corrupting the U.S. democratic system.


With Sanders as the only candidate to opt out of the super PAC system for 2016, his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton and the numerous candidates in the Republican field have reaped the financial rewards of these mega-donors.


As Politico reports:

The analysis found that the leading beneficiaries of checks from the top 100 donors were Jeb Bush's floundering campaign for the GOP nomination (a supportive super PAC received $49 million from donors on the list), Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton (super PACs dedicated to her raised $38 million from top 100 donors) and Ted Cruz's insurgent GOP campaign ($37 million).


In fact, despite his attacks on his party's donor class and his party's establishment, Cruz, the Texas senator who won last week's Iowa caucuses, appears to have locked down the support of four of the top six donors ― the Wilks family of Cisco, Texas (the No. 1 donor on POLITICO's list), New York hedge fund tycoon Bob Mercer (No. 2), Texas energy investor Toby Neugebauer (No. 4) and Illinois manufacturing moguls Dick and Liz Uihlein (No. 6) ― but only one other donor on the list.


Conversely, a super PAC supporting Cruz's GOP rival Marco Rubio raised only $22 million from POLITICO's list, but the Florida senator appears to have the support of 14 of the top 100 donors, suggesting his ultra-rich supporters might be willing to spend even more to support him if he survives his widely panned Saturday night debate performance and emerges as the establishment's best bet to knock off Cruz and national GOP polling leader Donald Trump.


Its analysis of the top 100 donors, Politico explains, includes "contributions to super PACs through the end of 2015 that were disclosed to the Federal Election Commission, combined with analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics and an estimate of average small donation size ― $75 ― calculated by the Campaign Finance Institute.  The analysis doesn’t include money donated to nonprofit groups that don’t disclose their donors ― including groups set up to support Rubio, Bush and Clinton ― nor does it include donations to super PACs funneled through shell companies or other nonprofits in a way that avoids FEC disclosure."


Last week, discussing the importance of its many individual donors—a large percentage of whom can give again and again as they haven't reached the limit for individual giving—the Sanders campaign said that the millions of smaller gifts "continue to be the financial backbone" of its operation. In January alone, the campaign said, "nearly $21 million was donated" in the form of "812,012 separate contributions averaging only $26 apiece." Those gifts brought the total number of donations since Sanders launched his presidential bid to more than 3.3 million, a record for any presidential candidate at that point in a campaign. And since his performance in Iowa, the campaign has announced another major spike in new and returning donors.


It is for this reason that many economists and political commentators like the Campaign for American's Future Richard Eskow repeatedly declare that "runaway inequality is the central issue of our time," one with direct implications for nearly all the key issues under consideration in this election. 


"A government controlled by wealthy individuals and large corporations," writes Eskow on Monday, "will be much more likely to harm the environment and subvert democratic processes."


[...]