"Grinding my teeth so
hard they snap off at the roots."
Monday, December 02, 2019

President-elect Donald J. Trump and U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi smile for a photo during the 58th Presidential Inauguration in Washington, D.C., Jan. 20, 2017. (Photo: U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Marianique Santos/Department of Defense/cc)
Progressives on Monday
criticized House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for reportedly leaving a broadly popular
bill boosting union membership on her desk for months while pushing for the
passage of one of President Donald Trump's legislative priorities, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada
Agreement, by Christmas.
"I don't know exactly
what the holdup is," said Rep. Pramila Jayapa (D-Wash.), a co-chair of the
House Progressive Caucus, "it is taking longer than it should given the
number of co-sponsors that we have."
Pelosi's decision to push the
USMCA forward while leaving the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, or
PRO Act, on her desk since it passed out of committee on September 25 was the
subject of an article by
Rachel Cohen at The Intercept Monday morning.
According to Cohen's
reporting, the USMCA is seen by moderates as a good example of bipartisan
compromise leading up to the 2020 election while labor is antagonistic to the
bill:
Centrist Democrats have
been insisting
privately that a quick passage for the trade deal is necessary for
moderate members of Congress to win their competitive reelections in 2020, to
show they can "do
something." Unions have made clear, though, that from their
perspective, USMCA lacks real labor enforcement mechanisms, which could
undermine the whole deal, further drag down wages, and eliminate more jobs.
The PRO Act, on the other
hand, is a bill with appeal across the party, with 215 House co-sponsors.
"Many other bills have
come to the floor with fewer co-sponsors than this one," Jayapal
told The Intercept.
Nevertheless, Pelosi is
letting the PRO Act sit on her desk, a decision that left journalist Ryan
Cooper frustrated.
"Grinding my teeth so
hard they snap off at the roots," tweeted Cooper.
It's not the first time
Pelosi's leadership of a Democratic-controlled House has led to the shelving of
labor-friendly legislation. In 2009, the chamber failed to pass
the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), which would have passed through the
then-Democratic Senate and ended up on President Barack Obama's desk.
The parallels to this House
bill are clear, The District Sentinel cohost Sam Knight said on
Twitter.
"In 2009, EFCA was
cosponsored by a majority of members when Dem leaders refused to even bring it
up for a vote," said Knight. "Pelosi is so utterly devoted to serving
her donor class friends."
DSA organizer Margaret
McLaughlin did some
math to figure out how she felt about implications of Cohen's
reporting.
"Handing Trump a USMCA win
without any strong labor enforcement mechanisms + not passing the PRO act which
would sail through the House = gonna give me an aneurysm," said
McLaughlin.
No comments:
Post a Comment