Peter Castagno December
16, 2019
“We don’t have any basis or
any evidence for calling this a hot labor market.” – Fed Chairman Jerome Powell
Despite strong job growth and
a 50-year low unemployment rate, nearly half of all American workers qualify as
low wage, according to a Brookings Institute analysis published last month.
The report found that “53 million Americans between the
ages of 18 to 64—accounting for 44% of all workers—qualify as ‘low-wage.’ Their
median hourly wages are $10.22, and median annual earnings are about $18,000.”
The report found that low wages pervade in every
regional economy throughout the country, and that they are a major source of
economic vulnerability in the population.
“Even though the economy is
adding more jobs, there’s increasing evidence that many of those new positions
don’t offer the kind of wages and benefits required to get ahead,” reported CBS News. “A new measure called the Job Quality Index recently
found there is now a growing number of low-paying jobs relative to
employment with above-average pay.”
The Brookings report found that contrary to popular
belief, the majority of low wage workers aren’t students or young people, the
majority “are adults in their prime working years, and low-wage work is the
primary way they support themselves and their families.”
“Workers aren’t shy about expressing
their frustrations, with about 6 of 10 workers saying their jobs are mediocre to downright bad, according
to a recent Gallup job-quality survey,” reported CBS. “For instance, 1 in 5 workers told Gallup
their benefits are worse now than five years ago.”
Low unemployment has
contributed to some wage growth in recent years after decades of stagnation.
From 1978 to 2018, median worker pay only grew by 11.9% when adjusted for
inflation, while average CEO pay for the U.S.’s biggest 350 companies grew by
940% over the same period, according to the Economic Policy Institute.
However, as Fed Chairman Jerome Powell explained in July, despite low
unemployment wages are barely growing enough to cover productivity increases
and the cost of inflation.
“We don’t have any basis or
any evidence for calling this a hot labor market,” Powell said. “We have wages and benefits moving up at 3%,
which is good because it was 2% a year ago, but 3% barely covers productivity
increases and inflation.”
A Great Time For Investors
Beyond the 50-year low
unemployment rating, President Trump has touted the stock market’s
record-breaking performance as proof that the U.S. economy under his
administration is the “best it has ever been.”
“From stocks to government
debt to corporate bonds to commodities, no matter where you went, you reaped a
profit this year,” wrote CNBC earlier this month.”The S&P 500 is up more
than 25% and counting. Treasurys, which tend to fall when risk assets rally,
also gained in 2019. Oil, gold and corporate bonds all scored double-digit
returns.”
CNBC attributes Fed policy, including cutting interest
rates three times and pumping billions into the financial system, as reason for
the stock market’s record performance. Yet despite the tight labor market and
impressive stock market, some analysts argue that the reality of the
population’s economic situation isn’t reflected by these metrics, as
demonstrated by the report showing that almost half of Americans work low wage jobs.
Economist Dean Baker has explained how the stock
market is often misunderstood as a measure of the health of the economy.
However, the stock market is not the economy, Baker explains, “the stock market is a measure of the
expectations of future profits of companies that are listed in the exchange.”
“The basic logic here is
simple. The price of Microsoft, Boeing or Pfizer stock is not going to rise
because workers are getting pay increases or they can take longer
vacations,” wrote Baker. “The price of these companies’ stocks will
rise if investors believe that events will cause their profits to be higher.
That’s the end of the story.”
For example, Goldman Sachs has
recently advised investors to pursue a “low labor cost” strategy, based on targeting industries with low exposure to rising labor
costs and avoiding companies where wages are growing, demonstrating
how what benefits the stock market does not necessarily benefit the economic
well-being of the population. The bank’s strategists believe that if wage
growth continues, stocks that are immune to rising labor costs will outperform
the market.
While Gallup found 55% of Americans reporting they own
stock in April 2019, including individual stocks and stocks included in mutual
funds or retirement savings accounts like a 401(k) or IRA, the
richest 10% of Americans own 84% of all stocks. With nearly half of
Americans excluded from the stock market and the majority of its gains accrued
to the country’s wealthiest citizens, critics argue that designing policy
centered around the stock market exacerbates inequality and hurts the broader
economy.
Baker argues that many policies that would hurt the stock
market – stopping Big Pharma price gouging, curtailing fossil fuel
production, and allowing labor unions to bargain for better wages – would be
good for the economy and broader society. The economist notes that the U.S. had
very strong growth with widely shared benefits in the 1950s and 1960s despite
stock prices being far lower relative to the economy.
Because these policy changes
would improve peoples’ jobs and living conditions, Baker argues that it is important for people to
“recognize that reining in bad practices in the corporate sector is good for
the economy of the country and the world, even if it is bad for investors.”
No comments:
Post a Comment