NEW YORK—At a press conference
Monday, American Civil Liberties Union officials announced that the
organization will go to court to defend a neo-Nazi group's right to burn down
ACLU headquarters.
ACLU president Nadine Strossen
told reporters that her organization intends to "vigorously and
passionately defend" the Georgia chapter of the American Nazi Party's
First Amendment right to freely express its hatred of the ACLU by setting its
New York office ablaze on Nov. 25.
"I am reminded of the
words of Voltaire: 'I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the
death your right to say it,'" Strossen said. "While the ACLU
vehemently disagrees with the idea of Nazis torching this building, the
principle of freedom of expression must be supported in all cases. If we take
away these Nazis' right to burn down our headquarters, we take away everyone's
right to burn down our headquarters."
Buddy Carver, president of the
Georgia chapter of the American Nazi Party, praised the ACLU for taking on his
case. "I would like to thank Ms. Strossen and all the other nigger-loving
bleeding-heart liberals at the 'ACL-Jew' for defending my constitutional right
to express my loathing of them with hundred-foot-high flames," said
Carver, sporting a tan uniform and swastika arm band. "We must finish the
job Hitler was unable to."
ACLU associate director Mel
Rosenblatt agreed. "The real danger here is not the American Nazi
Party," he said. "The real danger here is what would happen to the
rest of us if the Buddy Carvers of this world were not allowed to commit arson
against nigger-loving, bleeding-heart-liberal Jew attorneys."
Making the case all the more
controversial is the neo-Nazis' demand that the ACLU's entire 315-person staff
be in the building at the time of the blaze. Strongly opposing the request are
New York City police commissioner William Bratton, fire chief Ed Holm and mayor
Rudolph Giuliani, who said that all 315 will die if trapped in the 47-story
building during the blaze. ACLU attorneys responded that they will request a
federal appeals hearing if the City of New York attempts to stop them and their
fellow ACLU employees from perishing in the Nov. 25 blaze.
"Yes, my loving wife
Linda and three wonderful children, Ben, Robby and Stephanie, will be
devastated when I am killed next month," ACLU attorney Harvey Gross said.
"But I recognize that, in a very real sense, it would be a victory for Mr.
Carver and his fellow hatemongers if I did not burn to death, because their
terrible message of bigotry and intolerance would be all the more effective if
suppressed."
The Carver case is one of
several controversial legal battles with which the ACLU has been involved this
judicial year. In State of California v. Tubbs, the organization defended the
right of a San Francisco art gallery to display a piece of performance art in
which innocent passersby are shot to death by gunmen. In February, the ACLU
went to U.S. Appeals Court to defend the Grand Wizard of the Coahoma County,
Mississippi, chapter of the Ku Klux Klan's right to beat a black man to death
and spray-paint 'White Pride' across his chest.
"We can have no arbitrary
setting of limits when it comes to the Bill of Rights," Strossen said.
"The Constitution does not say, 'You have the right to express these
opinions, but not those opinions.' Nor does it say, 'You can express these
opinions by word, but not by violence.' For a free society to work, hatred, in
all its forms, must be encouraged."
No comments:
Post a Comment