The Times pieces misleads
readers into thinking there is more skepticism about Sanders’ plan among lefty
economists than there actually is.
BY Dean Baker
A New York Times piece
headlined “left-leaning economists question cost of Bernie Sanders’ plans” may
have misled readers about the extent of skepticism among economists who
consider themselves left-leaning. I can say this as a card-carrying
left-leaning economist who often talks to other card-carrying left-leaning
economists.
While there are undoubtedly
many left of center economists who have serious objections to the proposals
Sanders has put forward, there are also many
who have publicly
indicated support for them. Remarkably, none of those economists were
referenced in this article. In fact, to make its case on left of center
economists’ views, the NYT even presented the comments of Ezra Klein, who is
neither an economist nor a liberal, by his own identification.
It also misrepresented the
comments of Jared Bernstein (a personal friend), implying that they were
criticisms of Sanders’ program. In fact his comments were addressed to the
analysis of Sanders’ proposals by Gerald Friedman, an economist at the University
of Massachusetts who is not affiliated with the Sanders campaign.
It also presented the comments
of Brookings economist Henry Aaron about the views expressed by “other
economists in a ‘lefty chat group’ he joins online.” This would seem to violate
the NYT’s usual policy on anonymous sources.
Sanders has a very ambitious
agenda covering everything from universal Medicare, reforming the financial
sector, paid sick days and vacation, free college, and universal childcare. If
an economist, left-leaning or otherwise, can’t find some grounds for skepticism
on any of these proposals they should probably be in a different line of work.
These are all big ideas, each
of which will face enormous political opposition even if Bernie Sanders were in
the White House. Sanders has not given a fully worked out proposal in any of
these areas, nor is it reasonable to expect a fully worked out proposal from a
candidate for the presidency. His campaign platform outlines general
approaches. In the event Sanders got to the White House, it would be necessary
to draft fully worked out legislative language which would almost certainly
amount to hundreds of pages, and quite possibly thousands of pages, in each
area. In addition, whatever he initially put on the table would have to be
haggled over with Congress, even assuming that he had a much more sympathetic
group than the current crew.
While it is nice that the NYT
is subjecting Sanders’ views to serious scrutiny, it would be good if it also
subjected the views of other candidates to the same scrutiny. For example,
Secretary Clinton has indicated a desire to give more opportunity to African
Americans and Hispanics, yet she has not commented on the decision by the
Federal Reserve Board to raise interest rates at the end of last year. This
rate hike was intended to be the first of a sequence of rate hikes.
The purpose of raising
interest rates is to slow the economy and the rate of job creation, ostensibly
to prevent inflation. The people who will be disproportionately hurt by slower
job growth and high unemployment are African American and Hispanic. NYT readers
would likely be interested in knowing how Secretary Clinton can reconcile her
commitment to helping African Americans and Hispanics with her apparent lack of
concern over the Fed’s decision to raise interest rates and deny them jobs.
Whatever standard of scrutiny
the NYT chooses to apply to presidential candidates it should apply them
equally. It is not good reporting to apply one standard to Senator Sanders, and
even inventing credentials to press its points, and then apply lesser standards
to the other candidates.
This post first appeared at
the Center for Economic and Policy Research's Beat the Press blog.
Dean Baker is co-director of
the Center for Economic and Policy Research
and co-author of Social Security: The Phony Crisis (University of Chicago
Press, 2000).
No comments:
Post a Comment