http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/breaking-greece/
I’ve been staying fairly quiet
on Greece, not wanting to shout
Grexit in a crowded theater. But given reports from the negotiations in
Brussels, something must be said — namely, what do the creditors, and in
particular the IMF, think they’re doing?
This ought to be a negotiation
about targets for the primary surplus, and then about debt relief that heads
off endless future crises. And the Greek government has agreed to what are
actually fairly high surplus targets, especially given the fact that the budget
would be in huge
primary surplus if the economy weren’t so depressed. But the creditors keep
rejecting Greek proposals on the grounds that they rely too much on taxes and
not enough on spending cuts. So we’re still in the business of dictating
domestic policy.
The supposed reason for the
rejection of a tax-based response is that it will hurt growth. The obvious
response is, are you kidding us? The people who utterly failed to see the
damage austerity would do — see the chart, which compares the projections in
the 2010
standby agreement with reality — are now lecturing others on growth?
Furthermore, the growth concerns are all supply-side, in an economy surely
operating at least 20 percent below capacity.
Talk to IMF people and they
will go on about the impossibility of dealing with Syriza, their annoyance at
the grandstanding, and so on. But we’re not in high school here. And right now
it’s the creditors, much more than the Greeks, who keep moving the goalposts.
So what is happening? Is the goal to break Syriza? Is it to force Greece into a
presumably disastrous default, to encourage the others?
At this point it’s time to
stop talking about “Graccident”; if Grexit happens it will be because the
creditors, or at least the IMF, wanted it to happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment