Friday, November 6, 2020

Weimar America?





We Are Guaranteed Only One Thing, Nothing More

Trump's likely defeat guarantees one big thing, but everything else will have to be fought for, because oligarchs will concede nothing in their class war.


David Sirota
Nov 6






Though the results are not yet final, it appears that Donald Trump will be defeated. This is undeniably good news, and even amid all the bad news — and there is a lot of it — we should all take some time to feel genuine gratitude. Even the most hardened cynic should be able to experience at least some twinge of relief that he will probably be gone.

That said, even the most loyal MSNBC-watching liberal should probably understand that because of the down-ballot results, this election is only guaranteed to give us one very important thing. But everything else will have to be fought for — and almost certainly, a lot of people will continue to suffer and perish.

During this pandemic, we are not guaranteed to get much more relief. Joe Biden has recently changed his tune about deficit spending under pressure from progressives. But he has also spent decades touting himself as the guy who wants to work with Republican lawmakers to cut Social Security in the name of debt reduction.

During this health care cataclysm, we are not guaranteed to get anything at all. Biden campaigned against Medicare for All and has lately touted a much more limited version of even a modest public health insurance option, which will face tough odds in a Senate whose majority party is run by Mitch McConnell and in a Congress that is partly owned by insurance companies.

During this climate emergency, we are not guaranteed to get the sweeping energy and environmental policy changes that scientists tell us are necessary to protect the ecosystem that sustains human life. Biden must be pressured to use executive authority, as congressional Republicans continue to prioritize the profits of their fossil fuel donors over their own constituents whose communities are being incinerated.

During this cataclysm of misinformation, we are not guaranteed to see major changes from a corporate- and billionaire-owned media that has consistently ignored working people, touted oligarchy and funneled cash into vapid horserace punditry while starving journalism of resources. We will only change the information ecosystem through the slow and difficult work of building and supporting new forms of grassroots-funded media, and by breaking up the

During this crisis of confidence in government and our political system, we are not guaranteed to see systemic changes in the political leadership that delivered us to this moment of peril. Yes, Trump will be gone, but unless there are loud demands made — and unless presidential power is actually used — the ethos of “nothing will fundamentally change” will likely become a governing strategy. Without pressure for real change, that strategy would be implemented by the same congressional leaders and political operatives who will inevitably be reinstalled into positions of authority — even after they and their ideology created the conditions for Trump in the first place.
A Respite From The Toxic Slime

The only thing Trump’s defeat guarantees is a respite from the presidency being used to incite, enflame and psychologically destabilize us on a daily basis — and, as I’ve written before, that is no small thing.

While some Republicans will try to save face and pretend Trump’s agenda is some anomaly, that’s false — on policy, Trump has merely championed a brazen version of his party’s longstanding agenda. But Trump is an anomaly in how he has used the bully pulpit to try to sow anxiety, fear and hate on a daily basis.

Sure, lots of other presidents have been horrible, but no president has used the White House megaphone in the way he has — and the damage that another term of that would have done is terrifying to even think about. Four years of his demagoguery has already coarsened our culture and empowered the darkest forces of fasicsm, greed and white supremacy — four more years would have irreparably changed the nation’s psyche.

Biden will not use the presidency in that way. He may promote corporate Democrat talking points. He may give in to McConnell and his donors and stock his administration with Republicans and Wall Street cronies. And he may continue telling billionaires that he will protect their interests — and if everyone goes back to brunch and he is not pressured, he may not deliver many decent policies.

But one thing is all but guaranteed: he will not use the bully pulpit as a weapon of nihilistic incitement — and that at least is a good thing, and a very significant change from Trump.
Is This Weimar America? Or Something Better?

Of course, a lot of folks are still understandably angry that the Democratic Party took a rare moment of transformational possibility — an FDR-style opportunity in the face of one of the most winnable presidential races in recent memory — and used that moment to nominate an incrementalist who responded to a national emergency by literally promising his donors that nothing would fundamentally change.

We may look back on that particular nominating decision as one of the most epic and tragic missed opportunities of the last century — especially because Biden did not really earn his election victory. His retrograde record was wildly out of step with the times, he won the Democratic primary because almost every past vice president has won their party’s nomination, and he did everything he possibly could to try to lose the general election

But COVID, an economic crisis and tireless grassroots organizing by heroic progressive activists and groups ended up narrowly defeating his opponent. It never should have been that close — Michael Moore’s ficus plant should have been able to win a landslide during a pandemic and an economic meltdown, and Biden did the bare minimum without actually shitting the bed.

The fact that it was even a narrow race — and the fact that Trump increased his support among some communities of color — is a disturbing sign for the future, particularly with Democratic leaders already doubling down on the “nothing would fundamentally change” message, even after the party’s disappointing down-ballot losses.

Then again, we don’t know where we are in our historical story. A Biden presidency may well be the final Weimar America period — the last interregnum of artificial calm, stasis and establishment let-them-eat-cake-ism before everything collapses into mayhem at the hands of a much smarter, shrewder and even-more-reckless version of Trump.

However, one thing we’ve learned in the last few years is that things are unpredictable and can change quickly — and that means they could change for the better, if we’re willing to put in the work.

Exit polls show that the crushing reality of life in this oligarchy is changing minds a lot faster than politicians might let on. The fake, manufactured, self-serving “center” of the Beltway discourse may have held for now — and may be lifting the spirits of Wall Street moguls — but usually reality wins out at the end of the day.

The big question is whether we can still muster the will to reduce the amount of pain, suffering and death between now and then.



Bunker Baby is a sore loser


Trump Goes to Court to Avoid Being a ‘Loser’

Timothy L. O'Brien

Fri, November 6, 2020, 5:00 AM CST·6 mins read



https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-goes-court-avoid-being-110002202.html




As expected, Donald Trump has lobbed lawsuits at a few states, challenging the bona fides of presidential voting. In a pair of cases in Michigan and Pennsylvania, he’s pushed to stop ballots from being tallied, while in Georgia he claimed negligence on the part of a single poll worker. He’s also threatened to demand a recount in Wisconsin and to sue Nevada for tallying “illegal votes.”My Bloomberg Opinion colleague Noah Feldman accurately described the Michigan, Georgia and Pennsylvania lawsuits as toothless. Judges in Michigan and Georgia dismissed the suits there on Thursday. And in Nevada, an NBC reporter, Jacob Soboroff, gamely tried to pin down a former Trump intelligence official, Ric Grenell, for evidence of voter fraud supporting the lawsuit there. Grenell stayed mum.Trump’s lawsuits are plainly frivolous and manage to equate counting votes with fraud rather than democracy. But the point of the lawsuits isn’t to cure an actual problem. Trump has spent months claiming that elections and mail-in voting in the U.S. are riddled with malfeasance. They’re not, of course. His lawsuits are an extension of that push, and the true goal is to find someone or something that he can blame for his own failures and shortcomings — in this current case, possibly losing a presidential election.Days, weeks, months and years hence, Trump will point at these lawsuits as tangible proof that something was rotten in the 2020 presidential election. In fact, he will say, had the election not been rigged, he would have won. That’s a two-fer for Trump: It allows him to avoid taking responsibility and helps him dodge the “loser” label he enjoys slapping on everyone else but so fears himself. In that context, the lawsuits are well worth it to him, even if they help erode public trust in the electoral process.This is all old hat for Trump; he’s been involved in at least 3,500 lawsuits over the last three decades or so. He learned long ago from the late Roy Cohn how to weaponize the legal system against business competitors, the government and critics, gaining the valuable insight that sometimes merely filing a suit got him just as far as actually going to court. If it made a financial or legal problem go away, cowed an opponent or provided him with a fall guy, that was enough.The media has been a favorite Trump target, and he’s routinely rattled his saber against reporters without following through. (Trump unsuccessfully sued me for libel in 2006, claiming that a biography I wrote, “TrumpNation,” unfairly questioned his business record and the size of his fortune.) But there have been plenty of others:

The Department of Justice sued Trump, his father and their real estate company in 1973 for violating the Fair Housing Act by discriminating against prospective renters of color who wanted apartments in Trump buildings. Trump, guided by Cohn, countersued for $100 million, alleging that the feds were acting irresponsibly and that their claims lacked merit. The judge tossed the Trump suit, and he and his father eventually settled with the government out of court. Trump spent years using his countersuit as a prop, claiming the government had wanted him to lease to welfare recipients (when, in fact, he was accused of plain old racism) and that he had successfully beaten down Uncle Sam (when, in fact, the government required the Trumps to stop discriminating and later took them to court again for failing to comply with the settlement). When Trump proposed building a 150-story skyscraper on the West Side of Manhattan in 1984, an award-winning architecture critic for the Chicago Tribune, Paul Gapp, wrote that the building’s design was "one of the silliest things anyone could inflict on New York or any other city." It aspired to make history as “Guinness Book of World Records architecture” rather than for superb aesthetics, Gapp noted. Trump sued the Tribune and Gapp for libel, charging that Gapp described the atrocious and ugly monstrosity he planned to build as “an atrocious, ugly monstrosity” — even though Gapp had never used such language. Trump’s suit was dismissed. The Tribune spent about $60,000 defending the case, which was a warning shot against other critics of the future president. The development the skyscraper anchored was never built, and Trump, mired in debt, was forced to sell it to Hong Kong developers. He later blamed the project’s demise on New York, its mayor and its residents — everyone but himself. Marvin Roffman, a financial analyst, correctly told the press in 1990 that a new Trump casino in Atlantic City, the Taj Mahal, was larded with far too much debt to be profitable. Trump threatened to sue Roffman’s employer, Janney Montgomery Scott, for the remarks — persuading the firm to promptly fire the analyst. Roffman later successfully countersued Trump, and the Taj, like many enterprises Trump managed, went bankrupt. Trump would go on to claim that an inhospitable market in Atlantic City, rather than his own ineptitude and infatuation with debt, was why the Taj and other casinos he ran there belly-flopped. To finance the construction of a mixed-use hotel and condominium project in Chicago, Trump borrowed $500 million from Deutsche Bank AG, the German financial giant, in 2005. Trump personally guaranteed at least $40 million of that loan. Units in the Trump International Hotel and Tower didn’t sell particularly well when it opened in 2008, and when the financial crisis accelerated that year, Trump’s debt became unmanageable. What did he do? He sued Deutsche Bank for $3 billion, claiming that his lender — not him — was at fault because of its involvement in the financial crisis, which Trump also compared to a natural disaster. Deutsche Bank countersued, and both sides settled eventually — and miraculously kept doing business together. Trump had found yet another fall guy.

All of this pre-presidential litigation had less dangerous and damaging echoes than it does now, but the playbook has always been the same. With public faith in our core institutions once again under assault from Trump — and perhaps one of the last times while he’s president — it would be valuable for everyone involved to remember that POTUS is often a paper tiger, especially in court.





Sad Trump Supporter Throws Tantrum

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_3NLIj_Beg&ab_channel=act.tv



AskProfWolff: Marx & Bakunin: Socialism & Anarchism

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=In73FtywxS0&ab_channel=DemocracyAtWork



Wolff Responds: Split US Vote Reflects Desperation

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBiZZlOoiYw&ab_channel=RichardDWolff



The Importance of CLASS Politics

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYxaXcwT5Xc&ab_channel=NomikiKonst



Democrats Failing Working People Exposes Need For A People's Party

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjdE-0zcDXg&ab_channel=TheJimmyDoreShow