Wednesday, November 4, 2020

What we know already





Notes on election morning


Anand Giridharadas
Nov 4




About the most significant election in modern American history, there is much we still don’t know. But some things are already becoming clear.

A terrifying number of Americans would prefer to see their republic wither than have to share it with Others.

A media that is shy to describe autocratic attempts as what they are, early and often, makes it easier to pull them off.

Organizing our national conversation around polls that have no basis in reality is an extraordinarily wasteful use of mental space.

Too many of us are not only unable to persuade people on the other side but also unwilling to try, uninterested in winning people over.

Movements that agree on fundamental values need to learn to be better coalition allies to each other in spite of their differences.

Men need to be taught to channel their feelings of vulnerability in an age of stagnation, chaos, plague, and change into solidarity, not strongman lust.

The urgent work of making America less racist, indeed anti-racist, must proceed, while listening to those overlooked voices in the movement who emphasize expanding the circle more than circling the wagons.

The fantasy that incremental change is most appealing to most people must be buried, and the prophets of real change must find the language and candidates to make the cause of social democracy less frightening to many Americans than it now is.

The peddlers and enablers of disinformation won’t regulate themselves; we must regulate them.

If as a culture you don’t prosecute cheats and scammers when they’re merely cheats and scammers, one day they may use public office as a shield from prosecution.

We have ceased to be a country in disagreement; we are now a country of mutual disgust; and these widespread feelings of disgust essentially shut down politics.

A country that can no longer deliberate about the future, drawing on the same well of facts, may be a country not long for liberty.

The way out of this cold civil war is a politics that is thrilling, inclusive, substantive, visionary, galvanizing, empathetic, tolerant of different degrees of on-board-ness, and deft at meeting people where they are.

Democracy is not a supermarket, where you pop in whenever you need something; it’s a farm, where you reap what you sow. Let’s plant.





A Guide To The GOP’s Effort To Steal The Election





As election results start rolling in, here’s The Daily Poster’s late guide to the GOP’s efforts to suppress the vote in key battleground states.

Julia Rock and Walker Bragman
Nov 3




Many millions of Americans are voting by mail or drop-box because of the pandemic and turnout could increase thanks to an unpopular president. The Republican Party has responded by accelerating its assault on voting rights and filing lawsuits at the eleventh hour to stop ballots from being counted.

President Donald Trump has suggested that the election will be rife with fraud given the number of mail-in ballots. (When asked to provide evidence of voter fraud in court, the Trump campaign has failed –– because widespread voter fraud is a myth.) Trump argued the Senate needed to confirm new Justice Amy Coney Barrett because the Supreme Court could decide the election.

We’ve compiled a guide to some of the GOP’s most egregious attempts to steal this election through the courts.

PENNSYLVANIA:

In Pennsylvania, Republicans successfully petitioned the state’s Supreme Court to toss so-called “naked ballots,” the term for mail-in ballots that lack the dual envelope protection required under state law. Democrats had argued that such a decision could end up resulting in thousands of discarded ballots.

Republicans had also challenged the state’s extended deadline for receipt of mail-in ballots but were unsuccessful even after taking their case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

State officials in Pennsylvania told The Washington Post that they are preemptively segregating late-arrival mail-in ballots in order to preempt any effort by the administration to undermine the results of the vote.

FLORIDA:

Florida Republicans successfully disenfranchised an estimated 774,000 people, receiving a ruling in their favor (from the Republican-stacked 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals) to significantly roll back a voter-enacted constitutional amendment to restore voting rights to people with felony convictions.

The constitutional amendment passed in 2018 with 64.5 percent of the vote, ending a practice that disproportionately disenfranchised the state’s Black voters. But Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Republican state legislature acted quickly to enact laws adding burdensome barriers to voting for people with felony convictions, including a law requiring people to pay their outstanding court fees and fines before casting a ballot.

Democrats and civil rights groups challenged the law, arguing that it amounted to a poll tax, but the 11th Circuit overruled a district court decision that found the law did in fact amount to a poll tax.

TEXAS:

Harris County, Texas, has become a key battleground this election. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the county implemented universal curbside/drive-through voting, which is normally restricted to a narrow group of individuals under the state’s election code. Several prominent Republicans filed suit in federal court, asking the judge to end the expanded practice and to throw out more than 100,000 ballots that had already been cast this way.

Those Republicans — GOP powerbroker Steve Hotze, congressional candidate Wendell Champion, Texas state representative Steven Toth, and judicial candidate for Texas 80th District Court Sharon Hemphill — argued that not doing so “hurts not only the integrity and the reported outcomes of the election for all of the candidates and all of the voters who voted, but it could also dilute or otherwise diminish and cancel [their] casting of a legal vote for the candidates of their choice in the General Election.”

Fortunately, Judge Andrew Hanen, a George W. Bush appointee with a reputation as a GOP partisan, ruled on Monday that the plaintiffs didn’t have standing. However, Hanen suggested that Texans should avoid casting their votes in drive-through centers on Election Day.

Earlier this month, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott reduced the number of ballot drop-off sites to one-per-county. By 2019, Texas had closed more polling locations than any other state — and has closed 750 since 2012.

MINNESOTA:

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling on Oct. 29 that requires state election officials to segregate mail ballots that arrive on election day from ballots that are postmarked by election day but arrive after, in order to leave the door open for a Republican challenge to ballots that arrive after the election.

Official government bodies had been advertising that mail ballots postmarked by election day would be counted, and the mail ballots sent to voters say that mail ballots postmarked by election day and received within seven days of the election would be counted.

NORTH CAROLINA:

Late last month, Republican lawmakers in North Carolina petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to stop a decision by the state board of elections to extend the deadline for receipt of mail-in ballots to November 12 in order to handle a massive influx of mailed ballots.

Normally, North Carolina law only allows ballots postmarked by election day to be received three days after. But the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the extended deadline, holding that, “There is no irreparable harm from a ballot extension: again, everyone must submit their ballot by the same date.”

“The extension merely allows more lawfully cast ballots to be counted, in the event there are any delays precipitated by an avalanche of mail-in ballots,” the court found.

The Supreme Court let the lower court ruling stand last week.

WISCONSIN:

The Supreme Court voted 5-3, along partisan lines, to require mail ballots to arrive by 8 PM on election day to be counted, overruling a Wisconsin federal district court’s order that ballots postmarked by election day had up to six days after the election to arrive and be counted.

Justice Elena Kagan wrote in her dissent: “During COVID, the state’s ballot-receipt deadline and the court’s decision upholding it disenfranchise citizens by depriving them of their constitutionally guaranteed right to vote. Because the court refuses to reinstate the district court’s injunction, Wisconsin will throw out thousands of timely requested and timely cast mail ballots.”

During the primary in Wisconsin, the state had accepted mail ballots for up to six days after the election, as long as they were postmarked by election day. Eighty thousand ballots that were counted –– about 5 percent of the votes cast –– arrived after election day.

This change, between the primary and general, could confuse voters and potentially result in thousands of Wisconsin ballots being thrown out.

MICHIGAN:

In Michigan, Republicans successfully petitioned the Michigan Court of Appeals to overturn a lower court decision allowing ballots postmarked the day before election day to be received up to 14 days after. As a result, voters now have to return their absentee ballots to their clerk by 8PM on election day, which could end up disenfranchising thousands.

GEORGIA:

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling requiring mail ballots to arrive by election day in order to be counted, overturning a district court judge’s order that had extended the deadline to November 6.

ARIZONA:

In September, an Arizona judge issued an order allowing voters up to five days after the election to sign unsigned ballots and have their votes counted. The ruling extended a provision already in state law which allows such a cure period for ballots with mismatched signatures from those on file.

Republicans successfully appealed the decision, securing a reversal in a federal appeals court. Now, voters must sign their unsigned ballots by today. Late last month, Maricopa County reportedly had 11,000 ballots without signatures or with mismatched signatures.







CN Live! 2020 US Election: THE AMERICAN DECISION

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4FhRkpSGR8&feature=youtu.be&ab_channel=ConsortiumNews



2020 Election Results Live: Presidential and Senate races | Fox News

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmrGeWxd87Y&ab_channel=FoxNews



Voter suppression, arbitrary state rules make this the worst election ever




NOV. 1, 2020
3 AM



https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-11-01/voter-suppression-worst-election-ever






To the editor: In my 70 years of being alive, this election season has got to be the absolute worst ever. (“Memo to the Supreme Court: Let the people vote,” editorial, Oct. 30)

The reduction of polling places and ballot dropoff boxes in some areas; the slowdown of mail service; the withholding of federal funding to certain states for nakedly political reasons — all are making this election particularly difficult.

This is a federal election. States could follow the same rules. Why should a voter in Texas have to drive for miles and miles to drop off a ballot?

I have long thought that all campaigning should be limited only to three months prior to election day. If a candidate cannot explain their stance on the issues within that time, too bad. Doing this would greatly reduce the fighting and allow the citizens to exercise their franchise as guaranteed by federal law. Of course, it would reduce the income of the various fields of the media industry.


And God knows, it would reduce the time we’d have to listen to and read of the insults made by the candidates of their opponents, which are, just plainly, rude behaviors.

Randy Smith, Cathedral City




To the editor: I don’t understand the thinking of the U.S. Supreme Court justices and their suppression, or at the very least discouragement, of voting.





They must have, at some point in their vaunted Ivy League educations, heard about the rise of fascism in Europe. Why on Earth are they bending the rules to favor authoritarianism in this erstwhile beacon of democracy?

I am mystified.

Zena Thorpe, Chatsworth

..


To the editor: The wisest thing the Supreme Court could do regarding the election is to stay out of it and avoid getting drowned in the quagmire with the disreputable Rehnquist court, which decided Bush vs. Gore in 2000.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh didn’t do Chief Justice John Roberts any favors by citing the Rehnquist court in his recent opinion on voting in Pennsylvania, but he did lay his cards on the table so we can see what things might look like down the road.

Democrat Joe Biden may well win the election handily, making it unnecessary for the Supreme Court to intervene. If so, Kavanaugh’s way of thinking is going to force Biden and Congress to expand not just the Supreme Court but probably the entire federal judiciary.

Kavanaugh has made it very clear what a 6-3 conservative majority will mean for Biden, and Biden will certainly realize that it will mean a failed presidency. It could also mean trouble for Kamala Harris if she runs for president in 2024.


The Supreme Court must be expanded and the conservative majority must be sidelined.

Muriel Schuerman, Downey



letterer Email Addr






Trump's FCC Repeals NET NEUTRALITY Again

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTblsgtB2FY&ab_channel=TheJimmyDoreShow



Contested Election? Labor Unions Vow General Strike

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1I75nGWB0zc&ab_channel=GrahamElwood