Wednesday, September 2, 2020

With thousands of new cases in US, opposition mounts against unsafe school and college reopenings





https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/08/31/scho-a31.html

By Jerry White
31 August 2020

Opposition continues to mount to the unsafe resumption of in-person learning as outbreaks of COVID-19 cases hit schools and universities across the United States. The rush to reopen the schools by the Trump administration, as well as state and local governments controlled by both parties, takes place as infections in the United States surpassed 6.1 million on Sunday, with over 187,000 deaths.

The full scope of outbreaks on public school campuses is not known because state and school district officials have sought to conceal the number of cases and silence educators who have attempted to warn the public. According to tallies kept by educators based on news reports, however, well over 3,000 students and staff members have become infected at public schools that have opened over the last several weeks.

On Sunday night, CNN reported that more than 8,700 positive cases have been reported at colleges and universities in at least 36 states, including 1,200 students at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, more than 1,000 at Illinois State and Illinois Wesleyan universities, and 264 at the University of Dayton in Ohio.
At Georgia College, with 500 cases and one of the highest COVID-19 rates in the country, students at the Milledgeville campus staged a die-in protest Friday to demand online classes, improved testing and rigorous contact tracing. On Sunday, Temple University in Philadelphia suspended in-person classes for two weeks after officials reported nearly 103 COVID-19 cases. Temple students and faculty members protested on the first day of classes, August 24, demanding a switch to online classes only.

The battle over the reopening of public schools for more than 50 million students has become the focal point of working class opposition to the homicidal back-to-work policy in the United States and around the world. As the Washington DC-based publication The Hill put it Sunday, “The debate over in-person K-12 instruction planning is inseparably tied to the issues of child care needs and parents’ ability to return to the workforce to help revive the struggling economy.”

In the nation’s largest school district, New York City, there is increasing sentiment for a strike to block Democratic Mayor Bill de Blasio’s plans to reopen schools for 1.1 million students and 135,000 school employees on September 10. The city, which has already had nearly 230,000 coronavirus cases and nearly 24,000 deaths from COVID-19, will open under a “hybrid model,” with some students taking classes online from home every day and up to 700,000 learning remotely part of the week and going to school buildings for up to three days a week.

Facing the possibility of a revolt from rank-and-file teachers, the United Federation of Teachers (UFT) is holding a meeting of its 100-member executive board tonight, where it could approve a proposal for a “safety strike.” If it passes, a Tuesday meeting of the union’s delegate assembly, which includes a representative from each of the district’s 1,700 school buildings, could vote to authorize UFT President Michael Mulgrew to call a strike of the union’s 120,000 members “if he deems it necessary.”

The UFT and its parent union, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), will not conduct any serious fight. Mulgrew and the UFT were instrumental in blocking teachers from shutting schools last March and worked hand-in-hand with de Blasio in downplaying the danger of the spread of the contagion on the very eve of its explosion in New York City. The delay in closing the schools cost the lives of at least 74 educators.

As in other locations where the unions have threatened strikes (Chicago, Detroit) or filed state lawsuits (Florida, Texas, Iowa), the UFT is seeking to dissipate anger and implement a more calibrated reopening of the schools overseen by labor-management bodies, which will supposedly ensure adherence to safety procedures and the provision of sufficient PPE and cleaning supplies.

But there is no such thing as a “safe reopening” of schools amid a raging pandemic. Because of their higher average age and related health conditions, an estimated 1.5 million teachers—one in four—are considered high risk for serious illness if they contract the disease. Because of this, record numbers of veteran K-12 teachers are resigning and retiring, an outcome that is desirable for districts seeking to cut costs.

But hundreds of thousands of teachers, school employees, parents and students are seeking to fight regardless of what the unions are doing. Since the summer, over 100 Facebook groups opposing unsafe school openings have sprung up and organized protests in cities and towns, large and small. Last Wednesday, teachers and supporters in Summit, New Jersey, a city of 22,500, held a sit-in protest to demand online learning. Educators carried signs declaring, “I can teach from a distance, but not from a coffin,” “What will you say when your child’s friends and teachers die,” and “Viruses don’t discriminate. Kids are not immune. Schools aren’t safe.”

Last month, the Educators Rank-and-File Safety Committee was formed as a national network to unify the struggles of teachers, school employees, parents and students independently of the unions and to prepare for a national strike to halt the unsafe opening of schools. A local rank-and-file committee has been established in Duval County, Florida, and more are being set up in a growing number of states and districts across the country.

In a video, the Duval Educators Rank-and-File Safety Committee outlined its demands, including transparency about infection outbreaks, protection from retaliation for educators who expose the truth, full resources for remote learning, the upgrading of all school ventilation systems, regular onsite testing, and no loss of income or positions for educators who stay virtual. The committee also rejects the efforts to economically blackmail parents into sending their children to school out of fear of losing their income or their jobs.

“We ask for income protection while they stay home while their children learn remotely. Who is going to pay for that? We call for a surcharge on the 52 billionaires in Florida, which pay no income tax. The most ultra-wealthy people have to pay their way too. Through this surcharge there will be plenty of money to pay for income protection for parents, adequate technology for students, renovation of these decrepit schools and their ventilation systems. The money is there! And we demand that it be spent in the right places.”

On Saturday, the Educators Rank-and-File Safety Committee held its second online call meeting, which was attended by teachers from New York, California, Michigan, Florida, Hawaii, Oklahoma and many other states. A report on the meeting will be published in the next few days.

Resistance to the opening of schools is growing throughout the world. In Germany on Sunday, the Socialist Equality Party, together with the International Youth and Students for Social Equality (IYSSE), organized an online rally titled, “Stop the school openings! Prepare for a general strike!” Hundreds of teachers, students and parents participated in the live-streamed event.

Afterwards, one commented: “Schools and kindergartens are currently a ‘breeding ground’ for this virus, therefore classroom teaching should be suspended during the corona pandemic or only in very small, manageable groups. Teachers should receive more money and also reasonable digital equipment, reasonable internet should be provided to everyone and parents/families should receive comprehensive financial support during this time.”

Last week, students in Dortmund, Germany founded a committee at their school to take joint action against the school opening push and fight for safe teaching conditions. Speaking to the WSWS, the founders of the action committee in Dortmund, Jan and Berdan, appealed to teachers, students and parents to take part in the fight against school reopenings and to build a network of committees.

“From a moral point of view, what is happening in schools at the moment is reprehensible,” Berdan said. “More schools and also companies and factories should form action committees to prevent worse things from happening.” Jan added, “Our committee is open to anyone who agrees that the reopening of schools, as it is happening now, must be stopped.”



The author also recommends:

Form independent rank-and-file safety committees of educators, parents and students!
[15 August 2020]

Teachers across the US join call-in meeting hosted by Educators Rank-and-File Safety Committee
[26 August 2020]

Social media purges of left-wing groups intensify



Len Scott01 September 2020

http://www.marxist.com/social-media-purges-of-left-wing-groups-intensify.htm

The censorship of social media accounts of left-wing groups has continued, with Facebook recently removing and restricting US anarchist and antifascist pages. This is part of a pattern, which has seen similar moves by other social media platforms. These purges demonstrate whose side these huge corporations stand on, and why we must fight for public control and ownership of social media.
Purges of accounts

Accounts that have been removed include It’s Going Down, the CrimethInc Ex-Workers Collective, the Pacific Northwest Youth Liberation Front, and Enough is Enough. Facebook have themselves suggested that almost 1000 groups and over 500 pages have been taken down. A large number of hashtags and accounts have additionally had restrictions placed on them.

Simultaneously, around 800 groups and 100 pages linked to the far-right conspiracy theory QAnon were restricted or removed. This is part of a policy change which Facebook have claimed targets “growing movements that, while not directly organizing violence, have celebrated violent acts, shown that they have weapons and suggest they will use them, or have individual followers with patterns of violent behaviour” while including those “that have demonstrated significant risks to public safety but do not meet the rigorous criteria to be designated as a dangerous organization”.

With the very vague “individual followers with patterns of violent behaviour” criteria, it is clear that this policy will allow, and is allowing, Facebook to censor pages due to their political views, not “threats of violence”. It also demonstrates why we cannot rely on the ruling class to allow free speech when a threat to their system exists.
Following orders from Trump

Coincidentally or not, this attack on antifascist and anarchist groups comes at the same time as public attacks by the ruling class in the US have intensified. Donald Trump has recently equated thugs terrorising communities with groups organising to try to prevent them, and this is the same tactic followed by Facebook. That is, they equate fascists with anti-fascists. It is probably best described as absurd to suggest that those attempting to physically oppose groups which have committed numerous acts of terrorism are in some way the same as those actually carrying out the acts!

This should not come as a surprise, with Trump attempting to solidify his support among the most backward layers ahead of the US presidential election. This copy-cat move by Facebook seeks to not only deflect the blame for violence away from the far-right reactionary thugs responsible, but also to try to discredit any movement that may threaten the capitalist system.

Not that any further proof should be needed, but it has also been pointed out that the far-right has been responsible for at least 329 murders in the last 30 years in the US, while left-wing movements have been responsible for none.
Continued censorship

This is far from the first time that social media companies have taken action against left wing accounts. In January, numerous Twitter accounts linked to the Venezuelan government were suspended without warning. This was extended to supporters of the Bolivarian revolution, including the IMT’s own Lucha de Clases account.

In just the last month, the account of Cuban newspaper Juventud Rebelde was suspended by Twitter, and YouTube closed accounts of TV channels in Venezuela and Cuba.

These are just some examples, and don't include action taken against individual posts, pictures and videos. As an example, activists have reported having posts deleted for attempting to blame the capitalist system for the Coronavirus crisis, on the grounds that it was fake news!

It should also be pointed out that the rules are not applied equally, with an example being the recent refusal to ban Indian politician T. Raja Singh. Singh, a leading member of Modi’s government, has consistently posted Islamophobic comments, even going as far as calling for Muslims to be shot. Facebook themselves have recognised that this violates their hate speech rules, but have refused to delete his account to avoid threatening their business interests in India. The same is true for several other prominent members of Modi’s BJP party who have stirred up hatred against Muslims. It is clear that Facebook has no interest in “preventing violence”, but is purely enforcing rules for their own interests, and that of the US ruling class.
Power of social media

The power that social media companies have should not be underestimated. It is estimated that half of the world’s population have at least one social media account. Facebook has 2.6 billion users, YouTube 2 billion, Instagram 1.1 billion, and Twitter 326 million. With such large coverage, social media platforms hold immense power over free speech. The importance of this has been shown in recent years, with organisation over social media playing a role in the Arab Spring and other recent movements.

Furthermore, polls have suggested that 50% of adults get news from social media rather than traditional newspapers and TV news. Social media should be a powerful tool for mass engagement and free speech, but its private ownership prevents this.
Social media corporations

The social media platforms are big business in their own right. Facebook’s revenue is almost $60 billion per year, YouTube’s is $20 billion, and Instagram’s and Twitter’s are over $3 billion. Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg is one of the richest individuals in the World, and it is owned, along with the other social media companies, by rich investors through the stock market.

It is for this reason, and not for any reason of ‘bad behaviour’ by the social media platforms, that the censorship is taking place. It is not in their interest to allow views that may threaten the capitalist system, so it is in their interest to remove them. This is similar to how the media is privately owned, to ensure that the views given a platform are only those which do not threaten capitalism.

These platforms are not politically neutral, even if they provide tools for all kinds of left-wing organisations. Facebook allowed right-wingers like Bannon and Mercer, in Cambridge Analytica, to use Facebook users' personal data to target racist and inflammatory adverts to what they perceived to be susceptible audiences in elections all over the world. This was probably just the tip of the Iceberg, and was revealed because the antics of Mercer & Co were going against the interest of another wing of the ruling class. Snowden’s revelations showed the far-reaching access that US intelligence services and their partners have to data, and they are undoubtedly using it in much the same way.
Publicly-owned social media

We cannot rely on the capitalist state and private companies to prevent fascists and racists from organising or promoting their views. In reality, when it suits them, they will let those very same people have a free reign, whether it be Stephen Bannon or Raja Singh. Ultimately, only the labour movement and the working class can prevent far-right organisation.

We stand in full solidarity with the left-wing groups which have been censored, and stand against any attempt by the ruling class to prevent left wing organisation. The only way to ensure free speech is to fight for working class ownership and control over the printed media and the social media platforms. With publicly-owned media and social media, we could ensure an equal platform for working class views, and not simply for the tiny minority in the ruling class.

The ruling class may allow ‘free speech’ when there is little threat to their position, but history shows that they will not hesitate to act when there is. The radicalisation due to the Black Lives Matter movement represents one such threat, and it is for this reason that militant sections of the working class are facing censorship.

Trump Advisor Pushes Herd Immunity Despite So Many Uncertainties

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLqGqbjAcVI



Trump incites vigilante violence against peaceful protests in Wisconsin





https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/08/31/pers-a31.html

31 August 2020

In the week since a fascistic gunman killed two protesters in Kenosha, Wisconsin and seriously wounded a third, the Trump administration and its allies within the media and political establishment have defended the killings and the murderer.

The actions of Kyle Rittenhouse, a 17-year-old Trump supporter who had previously attended Trump rallies, are the direct outcome of the incitement by this administration itself. It occurred during the week of the Republican National Convention, as speaker after speaker railed against the “radical left” and demanded the restoration of “law and order” in response to the protests over the police shooting of Jacob Blake in Kenosha last Sunday.

Over the weekend, when asked to respond to the murders, Trump refused to condemn them. He repeated an earlier statement that they were “under investigation” and that the administration was “looking at it very carefully.” Trump added, however, that it was protesters who were to blame, saying that Wisconsin “should not have to put up with what they have been through,” referring to the protests.

Others in and around the administration have been even more explicit in praising Rittenhouse. Donald Trump Jr., Trump’s eldest son, retweeted a post by right-wing commenter Tim Pool declaring that Rittenhouse “is a good example of why I decided to vote for Trump” and lauding him for deciding “to go up and protect businesses and offer medical support [to] people.”

Last week, Fox News host Tucker Carlson praised Rittenhouse for attempting to “maintain order when no one else would.” Speaking on CNN on Sunday, Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin repeatedly refused to condemn Rittenhouse, instead denouncing the “violence” and “economic destruction” in the week since Blake’s shooting.

Developments in Wisconsin have been followed by an escalating campaign by the Trump administration for a military-police crackdown in Portland, Oregon. Right-wing groups—including Patriot Prayer, which has ties with the Portland police—have been patrolling the streets of that city over the past week, firing mace and paintball guns against protesters and journalists.

After a member of Patriot Prayer was shot and killed on Saturday, Trump demanded the deployment of the National Guard in the city and tweeted, “LAW AND ORDER!!!” Referring to the fascistic gangs, Trump wrote that the “big backlash… cannot be unexpected after 95 days of watching and [sic] incompetent Mayor admit that he has no idea what he is doing.”

There is nothing spontaneous about the parade of armed vigilante groups in Kenosha, Portland and other cities. They are no less coordinated with the White House than the armed protests of fascistic groups at state capitol buildings in Michigan, Virginia, Minnesota and other states in April and May to demand an end to restraints aimed at stopping the spread of the coronavirus pandemic.

The strategy of the Trump administration is to wage the next two months of the election campaign under conditions of violence, military-police deployments and the threat of civil war. Its “law-and-order” campaign is being developed even as it is provoking violence and repression.

What is now taking place is an escalation of Trump’s efforts to develop a far-right, fascistic movement based on the police, sections of the military, and paramilitary-type organizations. The latest tirades follow his threat on June 1 to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy the military against protests, effectively attempting a military coup, and the deployment of federal paramilitary shock troops to seize and beat protesters opposed to police violence in July.

Trump’s actions come not from a position of strength, but from a position of fear and desperation. The ruling class is immensely sensitive to the growth of social anger in the working class.

Last week, the Republican National Convention was centered on hysterical denunciations of “socialism,” “Marxism,” “communism” and the “radical left.” In his own fascistic tirade on Thursday night, Trump declared the election a referendum that “will decide whether we save the American dream or whether we allow a socialist agenda to demolish our cherished destiny.”

The coronavirus pandemic has exposed the horrific consequences of the subordination of all social needs to the capitalist oligarchy’s drive for profits. The official death toll is more than 187,000, with projections that it could rise to 300,000 by December.

Tens of millions of people are unemployed and have been cut off from federal unemployment benefits. The trillions of dollars turned over to Wall Street—with the bipartisan support of both Republicans and Democrats—are to be paid for by forcing workers back to work, increasing exploitation and implementing massive cuts to social programs and infrastructure. Even as the death toll rises, the Trump administration is spearheading the drive to force children back to school so their parents can go back to work in unsafe conditions.

The growing movement of the working class must be unified on the basis of a clear socialist and revolutionary program.

The central danger is the subordination of opposition to the Democratic Party. A division of labor exists within the ruling class. The Trump faction is openly trying to create an environment to legitimize vigilante violence. The Democrats, however, speak for another faction of the ruling elite that is no less hostile to the interests of the working class.

For the past four years, the Democrats have worked to channel mass opposition to Trump—which erupted immediately after his inauguration—behind their anti-Russia campaign and the opposition of dominant sections of the military and intelligence apparatus to elements of Trump’s foreign policy. Terrified of and opposed to any movement of the working class against Trump, the Democrats have pursued their conflict with the White House using the methods of palace coup, culminating in the impeachment debacle that ended in February.

In response to the eruption in May of mass protests against police violence following the murder of George Floyd, the Democrats and their political allies have worked to hijack the demonstrations and direct them along racialist lines. The United States, they insist, is not divided between the working class and the oligarchy, but between “white America” and “black America”—a claim that feeds into Trump’s own efforts to develop a fascistic movement based on racism and backwardness.

This has culminated in the nomination by the Democrats of Biden and Harris, the shill for Wall Street and the ex-prosecutor. The Democrats’ election campaign advances no program to address the pandemic or massive social crisis. They are seeking ever more explicitly to divert popular opposition to Trump into a campaign for military operations against Russia and also China. Their orientation is toward the military-intelligence agencies, Wall Street and a section of the Republican Party.

The working class is an enormous objective social force. But the power of the working class has to be directed and guided by a conscious political perspective. The answer to the attacks by Trump is not to subordinate opposition to Biden, but to develop an independent movement of the working class that breaks free of the political straitjacket of the Democratic Party.

While Trump screams about the specter of socialism, a real socialist movement must be built. The Socialist Equality Party advances a program that meets the needs of the working class, not the corporate and financial elite.

The wealth of the billionaires must be expropriated. The trillions of dollars handed out to Wall Street must be reclaimed and redirected to meeting urgent social needs, including relief for the unemployed, universal health care and an emergency program to stop the coronavirus pandemic. There must be a halt to all evictions. The back-to-work and back-to-school campaigns must be halted, with all workers and parents affected receiving full income until the pandemic is brought under control.

There is not a single social problem that can be resolved without a frontal assault on the capitalist system itself. The coronavirus pandemic, mass unemployment and poverty, the devastating impact of wildfires and hurricanes, the growing danger of world war, and the drive to dictatorship—all make clear the urgent necessity for the development of a conscious political movement for socialism.

The SEP and our election campaign are spearheading the fight to bring a socialist program into the working class, in the United States and internationally. We are actively fighting to organize all sections of workers against the homicidal policy of the ruling elites. We call on all those who agree with this perspective to make the decision to join the Socialist Equality Party.

Joseph Kishore—SEP candidate for US President

Are student protests in Thailand the tipping point for change?

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBswkTtmexY



Public Health Experts Sound Alarm Over FDA Willingness to Roll Out Covid-19 Vaccine Before Finishing Phase 3 Trials



"Circumventing clinical trials would place huge numbers of people at risk," warned one leading virologist.


Brett Wilkins, staff writer



https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/08/31/public-health-experts-sound-alarm-over-fda-willingness-roll-out-covid-19-vaccine

Scientists, doctors, and public heath experts are expressing serious concerns following a Sunday interview in which the head of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said he was willing to bypass the normal approval process to authorize deployment of a Covid-19 vaccine before stringent safety testing is completed.

FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn told the Financial Times on Sunday that his agency was prepared to approve a vaccine before Phase 3 clinical trials were complete, if government officials believe the benefits of doing so outweighed the risks.


Hahn insisted that the government's decision would not be influenced by election year political pressure. "It is up to the sponsor [vaccine developer] to apply for authorization or approval, and we make an adjudication of their application," Hahn told the UK-based business paper. "If they do that before the end of Phase 3, we may find that appropriate, we will make a determination."

"This is going to be a science, medicine, data decision," he said.

Many public health experts, however, expressed skepticism about Hahn's claims.

"We absolutely cannot tolerate or accept an emergency authorization for any Covid-19 vaccine without reliable safety and efficacy data from Phase 3 clinical trials," Dr. Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University in New York, tweeted on Sunday.

"Circumventing clinical trials by issuing an EUA [emergency authorization]... would place huge numbers of people at risk for massive potential harm," she wrote.


"It makes a mockery of the very serious protections put in place to conduct clinical research ethically," Rasmussen added.

Writing in The Lancet last week, a group of medical experts acknowledged the need for "efficient, speedy, and reliable evaluation of many candidate vaccines against Covid-19." However, they warned that "political and economic pressures for rapid introduction of a... vaccine could lead to widespread deployment of a vaccine that is really only weakly effective... perhaps because of a misleadingly promising result from an underpowered trial."

"Deployment of a weakly effective vaccine could actually worsen the Covid-19 pandemic if authorities wrongly assume it causes a substantial reduction in risk, or if vaccinated individuals wrongly believe they are immune," the experts added.

Hahn insisted that the potential benefits outweighed the dangers, justifying the emergency authorization.

"Our emergency use authorization is not the same as a full approval," he told FT. "The legal, medical, and scientific standard for that is the benefit outweighs the risk in a public health emergency."

Numerous experts pointed to last week's announcement by President Donald Trump that the FDA had issued an Emergency Use Authorization for blood plasma treatment of Covid-19 after the president, Hahn and Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar claimed the treatment reduced deaths from the disease by 35%. It did not, and Hahn was subsequently forced to apologize amid stinging criticism from experts.


"I can't remember a mistake by the FDA or the commissioner as serious as this one," Dr. Eric Topol of the Scripps Translational Science Institute in La Jolla, California told NPR after Hahn's false claim.

"You saw the FDA be bullied by the president of the United States into approving something that they didn't want approved earlier, because he wanted them to do that," Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital in Philadelphia, said in an August 24 interview with the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Both China and Russia have approved vaccines before completing Phase 3 trials, drawing criticism from Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, who has questioned whether the Russian vaccine—which President Vladimir Putin claims his own daughter has received—is safe or effective.

The FDA has come under increasing pressure in recent weeks as Trump seeks to roll out a vaccine before the November 3 presidential election. To that end, HHS in June announced Operation Warp Speed, a public-private initiative headed by a former pharmaceutical executive, which the agency said "aims to deliver 300 million doses of a safe, effective vaccine for Covid-19 by January 2021."

On Friday, HHS Deputy Secretary Paul Mango said the government is "very pleased" with vaccine progress. "We feel we are absolutely on track—if not a little bit ahead—in terms of our overall objective," he added.

Trump has frequently been at odds with the FDA, which he has baselessly attacked as part of a "deep state" conspiracy.

"The deep state, or whoever, over at the FDA is making it very difficult for drug companies to get people in order to test the vaccines and therapeutics," the president tweeted on August 22. "Obviously, they are hoping to delay the answer until after November 3."


Pharmaceutical companies are currently manufacturing three of six vaccine candidates funded by Operation Warp Speed. Two of the six potential vaccines are currently in Phase 3 trials, according to the U.S. Department of Defense.

According to an August CNN poll, fully 40% of Americans do not want to receive a coronavirus vaccine when it becomes available, even if it is free and convenient. This, experts say, could hinder efforts to control the Covid-19 outbreak by preventing herd immunity. One Harvard Medical School professor said that establishing an independent panel might increase public trust in any potential vaccine.

"I'm hearing this from my peers, from doctors and nurses; they're not anti-vaxxers," Dr. Kathryn Stephenson told CNN. "They're pro-vaccine. They vaccinated their own children. But they are skeptical about this vaccine."

The number of total worldwide coronavirus cases topped 25 million on Sunday, with more than 6 million confirmed cases in the United States. More than 840,000 people around the world have died from the virus, with 183,000—or more than 1 in 5—of those deaths occurring in the U.S.

Numerous states including Iowa, North Dakota, and South Dakota—where hundreds of thousands of motorcycle enthusiasts gathered this month for the annual Sturgis Rally—are reporting a record number of new cases.

Prominent Evangelical Christian Caught In Sex Scandal With Pool Boy & Wife

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLqsP3vxvFc