Saturday, August 29, 2020

Social crisis, class struggle and the 2020 election





https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/08/29/pers-a29.html

29 August 2020

The 2020 election is taking place against the backdrop of the greatest social, economic and political crisis in the modern history of the United States.

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has deeply destabilized American society. Over 185,000 people have been killed. Some 16 million people are unemployed. Food lines stretch for city blocks, and one fifth of mothers with young children say their families do not have enough to eat.

The ruling class’s efforts to force workers back on the job, despite a raging pandemic, have led to a wave of strikes and protests and seen millions of people demonstrate against police violence in thousands of cities and towns throughout the country.

The 2020 election is defined by these twin processes: the protracted crisis of American capitalism exposed by the pandemic, and the explosive growth of anti-capitalist sentiment and mass radicalization in the working class, as part of a growing wave of social protest all over the world.

In their own way, last week’s Democratic National Convention and this week’s Republican National Convention represented the response of the parties of the ruling class to the eruption of social opposition, to which they are both hostile and fearful.

The more direct response comes from the Republicans. Speaker after speaker railed, in hysterical tones, some literally screaming, against a tide of left-wing opposition engulfing the nation. They ranted against “Marxism,” “socialism” and “mob rule” by left-wing demonstrators.

In his hysterical fixation on the growth of socialist sentiment, Trump knows he is not speaking about Democrats, such as Biden, Pelosi, Sanders or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. He has taken the measure of all of them and some, such as Kamala Harris, he has directly financed. Rather, he expresses the hysterical fear of the ruling class of mass working-class opposition emerging outside of the two-party system.

The Democrats’ response is more sophisticated. Employing their army of professional apologists and left-talking spin doctors, the Democrats sought to present themselves as sympathetic to the demands of protesters against police violence and of workers facing an American social disaster. But this was only to chloroform and disarm the mounting opposition, to splinter it into an array of warring “identities,” and to channel it into the dead end of racial politics.

It is a testament to the Democrats’ sensitivity to the growth of social radicalization that Bernie Sanders dropped all talk of a “political revolution” as soon as the pandemic broke out. He has since become the most enthusiastic proponent for the corporate shill Joe Biden.

In the spirit of patent medicine salesmen, both parties peddle their candidates as the miracle cure for what ails the country. But it is already clear that this election, regardless of its outcome, will not restore any form of normalcy to American political life.

In fact, the crises facing the country are so vast, sweeping, and all-pervasive, that neither convention was capable of even addressing them by name.

American capitalism, its exports increasingly uncompetitive on the world stage, is hooked on debt. Its corporations, with their astronomical valuations and massive executive bonuses, cannot survive without ever-larger government handouts. On Thursday, the final day of the Republican convention, the Federal Reserve announced a change to its basic methodology whose only discernable intent is to tell financial markets that it will give them even more money in perpetuity.

“Low Rates Forever!” proclaimed the Wall Street Journal, declaring that the strategy will lead to “more financial manias, panics and crashes.” The financial markets cheered, with all three stock indexes now in positive territory for the year despite what has been called the worst peacetime economic crisis in a century.

Millions are cutting back spending on food because congress refused to extend emergency unemployment aid. However, Jeff Bezos, the world’s richest man, has nearly doubled his wealth since the start of the year, becoming the first person with a net worth of $200 billion.

In the background, there are mounting warnings that the economic arrangement that gave rise to America’s “exorbitant privilege”—the hegemony of the dollar—may be at an end, as the price of gold breaks record after record.

Unable to compete with China’s rapidly developing technology sector, which has eclipsed the United States in several key aspects, Washington is provoking a new “cold war” with Beijing. America has been continuously at war for three decades, but its effort to reconquer the Middle East has been a disaster. Its hulking military machine is under major strain. In simulated tabletop conflicts, insiders complain that China’s military beats the United States. And yet, every day, the two countries are inching closer toward a military clash.

The toxic effects of inequality, reaction and war—with their ensuing sociopathic detachment to human suffering—has been given expression in America’s disastrous response to the pandemic, with its grisly toll of nearly 200,000 dead.

The only concern of the White House, local governments and major corporations is to sweep infections under the rug in order to limit corporate liability and paid time off. The number of tests is constantly shrinking, and the White House this week shockingly demanded that those exposed to the disease not be tested.

“Why Don’t The Dead Matter?” asks a columnist in the military blog Defense One. Endless wars, he argued, have made America “anesthetized” to death by “military adventures overseas that took… human lives… with near reckless abandon.” Indeed, mass death has been so institutionalized that the nightly news does not even report the daily death toll.

The World Socialist Web Site explained in its 2017 statement, “Palace Coup or Class Struggle,” that the Democrats’ opposition to Trump is centered on issues of foreign policy. They have demanded a more aggressive policy toward Russia and China, and even orchestrated his impeachment exclusively based on claims that he was insufficiently supportive of Ukraine in its “hot war” with Russia.

Since Trump’s election, the Democrats have worked on a bipartisan basis with Trump to slash corporate taxes, build up Trump’s personal gestapo of border patrol units, and carry out the largest bailout of major corporations in human history through the CARES Act.

This orientation is continued in the 2020 election. Indeed, the Democratic Party has cobbled together a coalition of right-wing former Republicans, generals, representatives of the state intelligence bureaucracy, members of the financial oligarchy and most of all, the affluent suburbs that are repeatedly invoked as the party’s target demographic.

In other words, the Democratic Party is running the 2020 election as a re-run of the 2016 election, which resulted in the defeat of Hillary Clinton in the Electoral College despite the fact that she won the popular vote by more than three million.

Trump is framing the election, as he noted ahead of his impeachment, as a “civil war,” in which all methods of political, military, and paramilitary struggle are permissible. By contrast, his Democratic opponents see the conflict, in the words of former President Barack Obama, as an “intramural scrimmage,” in which the greatest mistake would be to play too rough.

That is because, speaking as one of the two parties of Wall Street and big business, the Democrats are just as terrified of, and hostile to, the growth of mass popular opposition to capitalism as Trump is.

Outside the conflicts in Washington, however, another political force is entering onto the scene. Over the past several months, workers in major manufacturing facilities throughout America’s industrial heartland, as well as educators throughout the United States, have begun to form rank-and-file committees to resist the efforts by corporations and governments to force them to work in increasingly unsafe conditions.

And millions of workers and young people have participated in mass demonstrations—according to some, the largest protests in American history—against police violence and the Trump administration’s deployment of federal troops to American cities.

Much as Trump may rant and rave, puffing himself up in imitation of Mussolini, the next stage in American political life will be a movement, not to the right, but to the left, in a mounting social and political offensive by the working class.

This movement has not yet found its leadership. But that is coming. The increased censorship of the World Socialists Web Site speaks to the pervading fear in the ruling class that revolutionary socialism will find a mass audience.

America is entering a revolutionary crisis, whose central characteristic will be the intersection of the historical tradition of Trotskyism, represented by the International Committee of the Fourth International, with the global mass movement of the working class.

Andre Damon

Message from OpenDemocracy





Last year, fires ravaged the Amazon rainforest at a scale not seen for almost a decade.

The fires are mostly not accidental, but set to clear land for agriculture and cattle grazing. President Jair Bolsonaro has denied that his government is responsible. However, documents uncovered by openDemocracy last year paint a different picture. They revealed that officials planned to block conservation projects and paint indigenous communities and NGOs fighting loggers as enemies of the state.

A year on, the situation has continued to deteriorate, with the number of fires rising by almost a third in July compared with the previous year. On democraciaAbierta, Manuela Andreoni explains why, despite international outrage, the rainforest continues to burn.

The fires, along with increasing deforestation, have had a devastating impact on Indigenous peoples in the Amazon, threatening not only their livelihoods but also their culture.

Land and language are closely intertwined and as Indigenous communities have been displaced, the number of native speakers has declined.

Now there is a risk that many of the languages spoken by the first peoples of the Amazon might become extinct altogether – along with rich oral traditions that span centuries.

For the Kuruaya people, who live along the Xingu River, it may already be too late. Odete Kuruaya is the last fluent speaker of her people's native language. Miguel Pinheiro met with her as her community faces the looming threat of a new mining project.

Despite their relative isolation, these communities have not been untouched by the pandemic. Abandoned by a government that has worked to undermine Indigenous rights, they have taken it upon themselves to protect their vulnerable elderly.

For the peoples of the Amazon, there is more than one fire to put out. As Malian intellectual Amadou Hampaté Bâ once warned: “Every time an elder dies, a library is set alight”.

Prof. Richard Wolff: The System Is Failing

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rutN06v9sew



They’re constantly skimming votes in different ways.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAplKz3Hbo8



Outrage Grows Over Police Treatment of Alleged Kenosha Killer Kyle Rittenhouse Compared to Shooting Victim Jacob Blake

 In the streets and on social media, anger and questions about systemic racism and white privilege abound in the wake of Kenosha shootings. 



https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/08/27/outrage-grows-over-police-treatment-alleged-kenosha-killer-kyle-rittenhouse-compared

Anger and questions mounted on Wednesday night and into Thursday over the disparity in police treatment of Jacob Blake, a Black man shot numerous times by police in Kenosha, Wisconsin while intervening to stop a fight, and Kyle Rittenhouse, the heavily—and unlawfully—armed white teen who was given a pass by officers after he allegedly shot and killed two Kenosha protesters. 

Veteran Kenosha officer Rusten Sheskey fired seven shots at Blake, a 29-year-old father of five, hitting him four times in the back at near point-blank range on Sunday, paralyzing him from the waist down as three of his children looked on. Police said they found a knife under the floorboard of Blake's car, although there are no claims he was threatening anyone with it. 

Bishop Talbert Swan, president of the Springfield, Mass. chapter of the NAACP, tweeted video of a white man menacing police officers with a bladed weapon in response to critics playing up Blake's knife.

Blake's shooting stands in stark contrast with the police treatment of Rittenhouse, an aspiring cop and staunch supporter of President Donald Trump whose social media accounts are brimming with Blue Lives Matter posts, and who boasted online about being an armed vigilante. The teen, who posted numerous photos in which he poses with guns, apparently heeded calls on social media encouraging armed militia members to travel to Kenosha to protect property from "evil thugs," and urging "patriots" to "shoot to kill." 

The 17-year-old teen—the age to legally carry firearms in public in Wisconsin is 18—is seen in a video with other armed civilians violating Kenosha's 8:00 pm curfew. However, police challenged neither of these violations. Instead, officers in armored vehicles gave them water and told them that, "we appreciate you guys, we really do," while simultaneously ordering protesters to disperse and accusing them of "trespassing."

Cellphone video shows Rittenhouse running away after shooting three people, two of them fatally. "I've just killed someone," he says. Only one of the victims, 26-year-old Anthony Huber of Silver Lake, Wisc., has been identified as of Thursday morning.

After the shooting, Rittenhouse walked toward police with his hands in the air, his rifle slung across his chest, as protesters shouted to the officers that the teen had just shot two people. The officers allowed Rittenhouse to pass unmolested. He was able to travel back to his hometown of Antioch, Illinois, some 20 miles (32 km) away, before finally being arrested the following day and subsequently charged with first-degree intentional homicide.

Outraged observers took to Twitter and other social media to note the racist double standards and white privilege highlighted by the two shootings. 

"Jacob Blake was shot several times in the back while walking away from police officers," tweeted Nathalie Baptiste, a reporter for Mother Jones. "Kyle Rittenhouse made it all the way home before being arrested. Law and order is only for certain people."

Some compared the latest incidents to past police shootings of Black people and the treatment afforded to white shooters, including Dylann Roof, who massacred nine Black worshippers at a Charleston, South Carolina church in 2015.

Others criticized media coverage of the incidents.

"A 17-year-old white supremacist domestic terrorist drove across state lines armed with an AR-15," tweeted Rep. Ayanna Presssley (D-Mass.). "He shot and killed 2 people who had assembled to affirm the value, dignity, and worth of Black lives. Fix your damn headlines."

On Comedy Central's "The Daily Show," host Trevor Noah wondered "why some people get shot seven times in the back while other people are treated like human beings and reasoned with and taken into custody with no bullets in their bodies."

Meanwhile, Kenosha Police Chief Daniel Miskinis blamed Rittenhouse's victims for their own deaths because they were "out after curfew"—as was the shooter—while defending vigilantes' right to "exercise their constitutional rights."

As professional athletes and teams from numerous sports and leagues postponed games in protest of police killings of Blake, George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and others, right-wing media and sports personalities defended and even applauded Rittenhouse, while demonizing victims of police and white supremacist violence. Popular Fox News host Tucker Carlson said that Rittenhouse "had to maintain order," while disgraced former San Francisco Giants slugger Aubrey Huff, who has been disinvited from the team's 2010 World Series championship reunion over past racist and misogynistic comments, called the teen "a national treasure."

At the Republican National Convention, police brutality and the Kenosha killings went virtually unmentioned, while speakers heaped praise upon President Donald Trump for his tough "law and order" rhetoric. Trump, who has often been accused of courting and even inspiring white supremacists, has been conspicuously silent in the wake of the Kenosha shootings. 

Some RNC speakers decried the looting and "mobs" in cities run by Democrats while ignoring police and racist violence. 

"From Seattle to Portland to Washington and New York, Democrat-run cities across this country are being overrun by violent mobs," South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem said. "There's looting, chaos, destruction and murder." 

Some commentators wondered what it would take for many white Americans to finally see the racism that so many others are protesting. 

"The fundamental unfairness of [the Blake and Rittenhouse] tragedies in one Wisconsin city... should be enough for even the most stubborn of white Americans to understand why people are marching to assert and rightfully demand that Black lives matter," wrote Chicago Tribune columnist Rex Huppke. "The clear-as-glass unfairness of it all should be enough." 

But, he concludes, "it won't be." 

Venezuela: Aggression in October?





https://www.resumen-english.org/2020/08/venezuela-aggression-in-october/

By Ángel Guerra Cabrera, on August 26, 2020

A US-sponsored military aggression against Venezuela could take place before the November 3 elections in that country. On August 22, Admiral Remigio Ceballos, chief of the strategic operational command of the Bolivarian National Armed Force (FANB), said that “The international intelligence agencies allied to Venezuela inform us that Colombia is preparing an aggression, and the FANB will respond with force and forcefulness to any aggression against the sovereignty and independence of Venezuela, under the command of our Commander in Chief Nicolas Maduro Moros”.

“We are in the presence of a Colombian government that has attacked Venezuela the most in all our history,” he added. Ceballos also wrote on Twitter: During the year 2000, Plan Colombia was installed with 7 U.S. military bases in that country “to prepare its aggression against our nation and the entire region”. Days before, Samuel Moncada, Venezuela’s ambassador to the UN denounced; “Washington’s propaganda bodies already promote the invading multinational force in Venezuela … it must be with military occupation but without the visible presence of the United States in the front line. It is the armies of Colombia and Central America that will do the dirty work”. In another message, Moncada pointed out that the “final phase” of aggression against Venezuela, whose campaign of maximum pressure… is already underway, is moving to the military dimension. “They are looking for the ‘October surprise. In Venezuela we must prepare ourselves for the provocation in the making”. In another tweet, the Venezuelan representative in the UN showed a fragment of the article of the conservative website Washington Examiner, where the insinuations of the chief of the US Southern Command, Admiral Craig Faller and Phil Gunson, of the International Crisis Group, about an eventual invasion against Venezuela. According to the publication, in a seminar convened by the toxic Atlantic Council, Faller expressed, “The key is in how we can better share intelligence and how the international community can be more influential to force and change Maduro’s behavior and that of the “external state actors”, in obvious reference to Cuba, Venezuela and Iran.

Coinciding with this, they met in Bogotá with President Iván Duque, Faller together with Robert O’Brien, national security advisor to the White House, his deputy for Latin America, the Cuban-American Mauricio Claver-Carone, archenemy of Cuba and Venezuela and Trump’s candidate for president of the Inter-American Development Bank, and US ambassador to Colombia, Phillip Goldberg. The Colombian bowed down and announced that it would review “issues of security, the fight against drug trafficking, ‘the situation in Venezuela’ and the immigration of citizens from that country to Colombia. Washington’s cynicism goes so far as to accuse Venezuela of drug trafficking while its main ally in the region, Colombia, produces 90 percent of the world’s traded coca.

For its part, the Mexican website La Politica Online states that Cuban-American Senator Marco Rubio is agitating Trump’s campaign to convince the president to invade Venezuela in order to get Florida’s 29 electoral votes: Members of the Republican war room working to line up the Latino vote recently commented that, in at least two meetings, Rubio expressed himself in favor of a military action in South America in order to secure Florida’s votes in the Electoral College in November.

Fundamental antecedents reinforce the possibility that the aggression would be directed at Venezuela. First of all, President Donald Trump’s fixation with the South American country and its splendid natural resources, which has led him to ask military chiefs of the Pentagon about the feasibility of attacking it directly with US forces along with the enormous and incessant subversive attack and economic war it maintains against it. But, in addition, there is the fact of his current unfavorable situation in the polls, which if it continues, or worsens, could lead to the Democrat Joe Biden evicting him from the White House. U.S. presidents who have wanted to be reelected have increased their sympathy among voters by resorting to the so-called “October Surprise,” a military adventure that allegedly brings the country together around the commander in chief.

During the Donald Trump administration, military and paramilitary actions against Caracas organized from Colombia under the direction of Washington have not ceased. Among them the failed attempt to assassinate President Nicolas Maduro and the high political-military command of the Bolivarian Revolution on August 4, 2018, the defeated coup attempt of April 30, 2019, and the dismantled maritime invasion, with the participation of US mercenaries, in May 2020, called Operation Gideon. This was planned through a contract signed between the self-proclaimed Guaidó and the mercenary chief and former Green Beret Jordan Goudreau.

Source: La Pupila Insomne, translation Resumen Latinoamericano, North America bureau

Civically Minded National - Solar Panels, DACA, Facebook--HLM

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKeWeQbCHVM