Tuesday, February 18, 2020
Bloomberg’s billions and the politics of oligarchy
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/02/17/per2-f17.html
17 February 2020
Billionaire Michael Bloomberg has spent more than $300 million on television and internet ads that present “Mike” as an up-from-poverty, self-made fighter for progress and decency, a friend of the common man.
The marketing of Bloomberg involves distortions so grotesque that one commentator recalled the massive advertising campaign by Ford Motor Company, in the early days of television, to promote an exciting new model named the Edsel, arguably the ugliest and most unsuccessful car ever produced.
The Bloomberg campaign is spending more than $1 million a day on average just on Facebook ads. In advance of the March 3 primaries dubbed “Super Tuesday,” when there will be voting in 14 states, Bloomberg has spent $40 million on television and internet advertising in California, $33 million in Texas, $9.5 million in North Carolina and $6 million in Massachusetts. He is the only candidate to air TV ads in Virginia and Alabama. Except for fellow billionaire Tom Steyer, no other Democratic candidate has thus far spent even $10 million in all 14 states combined.
Michael Bloomberg speaks during his campaign launch of “Mike for Black America,” at the Buffalo Soldiers National Museum in Houston [Credit: AP Photo/David J. Phillip]
The electoral impact of Bloomberg’s vast expenditures—a drop in the bucket from his $60 billion fortune—is difficult to estimate in advance of the voting on “Super Tuesday.” March 3 will be the first time that the former mayor of New York City is on a primary ballot. Polls suggest that Bloomberg is close to the 15 percent mark required to win delegates to the Democratic convention. His aim, should he fail to win enough delegates to gain the nomination, is to combine with other “moderate” candidates to block a victory by the current front-runner, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.
Whatever the outcome of the primary campaign, it is clear already that Bloomberg’s spending exerts a vast influence on the Democratic Party establishment and on the corporate media (of which Bloomberg News, part of his empire, is a major component). It is safe to say that no other Democratic presidential hopeful could have survived last week’s series of press reports on Bloomberg’s support for “stop-and-frisk” police attacks on minority youth, his blaming the 2008 Wall Street crash on loans to minority borrowers, and his abusive treatment of female employees.
Last week, reports surfaced of Bloomberg’s 2015 comments on his policy as New York mayor of “stop-and-frisk,” in which he declared, “Ninety-five percent of your murders and murderers and murder victims fit one M.O. You can just take the description, Xerox it and pass it out to all the cops. They are male minorities, 15 to 25.” He went on to add, “The way you get the guns out of the kids’ hands is to throw them up against the walls and frisk them.”
In response, the Bloomberg campaign immediately rolled out endorsements of his campaign by three African-American members of Congress.
Anticipating the crisis, Bloomberg had already met with a group of prominent black pastors who had been critical of “stop-and-frisk” but were willing to administer absolution if the billionaire candidate was sufficiently apologetic—and generous. As Calvin Butts, pastor of the Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem, put it, with revealing frankness, “He used his money, which is one of the reasons I continue to support him, to express his sincerity.”
As a 5,000-word profile in the New York Times Sunday edition detailed, Bloomberg, who spent $270 million on his three successful campaigns to buy the mayoralty of New York City (2002-2013), built “an empire of influence” through targeted donations to an array of liberal and pro-Democratic Party groups over the past decade. According to the Times account:
Since leaving City Hall at the end of 2013, Mr. Bloomberg has become the single most important political donor to the Democratic Party and its causes. His personal fortune, built on a financial information and news company, is estimated at over $60 billion. It fuels an advocacy network that has directed policy in dozens of states and cities; mobilized movements to take on gun violence and climate change; rewritten election laws and health regulations; and elected scores of politicians to offices as modest as the school board and as lofty as the Senate.
This includes an estimated $270 million to gun control campaigns, largely through the Bloomberg-funded Everytown for Gun Safety group. He has pumped large sums into the Sierra Club, Planned Parenthood, charter school advocacy groups and similar organizations, giving himself near-veto power over their campaigns.
In one incident described by the Times, the Center for American Progress, a Democratic Party think tank, edited a report on anti-Muslim bias in the United States to remove a chapter on New York City police spying on Muslim mosques and communities that had eight references to Bloomberg by name. Bloomberg gave nearly $2 million to the organization.
A longtime Democrat who adopted the Republican label in 2001 to run for mayor, then ran for reelection as a Republican in 2005 and as an “independent” in 2009, Bloomberg supported Republican presidential candidates George W. Bush in 2004 and John McCain in 2008. He returned to the Democratic Party as an endorser only in 2016, when he backed Hillary Clinton. He later changed his registration to Democratic.
In 2018, Bloomberg spent more than $100 million supporting Democratic Party candidates for Congress through his personal super PAC, and he has pledged to spend $1 billion to elect Democrats this year, whether or not he wins the party nomination.
Among those now singing the praises of Bloomberg are dozens of current and former mayors, many of them African-American, from cities including Philadelphia, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Memphis, Tampa, Sacramento, Miami and Washington DC. This only demonstrates the completely corrupt and cynical character of identity politics, which a layer of the black upper-middle class has used to obtain a bigger share of the wealth and status of the top 10 percent, while the conditions of the vast majority of black workers and youth have continued to deteriorate.
In the wake of the “stop-and-frisk” controversy, an array of video and audio clips has surfaced documenting Bloomberg’s long record of racist and sexist comments.
The Associated Press reported last week that Bloomberg made comments in 2008 in which he blamed the collapse of the mortgage security market, which triggered the Wall Street crash, on efforts to restrict the practice of “redlining”—racial discrimination by bankers against predominately minority residential neighborhoods. A spokesman for the National Community Reinvestment Coalition called this “a billionaire defending other billionaires and placing the blame on lower-income homeowners.”
In a 2018 conversation with International Monetary Fund head Christine Lagarde, made public Sunday, Bloomberg can be heard opposing minimum wage laws and defending the finger printing of food-stamp recipients. He called the minimum wage one of “these impediments to job creation” that he favored eliminating.
On Sunday, the Washington Post published a 4,000-word profile of Bloomberg that documented a long series of allegations by female employees, largely about profane and sexist comments, many of them demeaning, some outright threatening. These were not #MeToo-style allegations of personal misconduct, but charges that Bloomberg encouraged a hostile work environment for women employees. These conditions generated dozens of lawsuits and numerous settlements in six and seven figures.
Any of these episodes would have destroyed another candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination. But for Bloomberg and his media acolytes, it is a big “so what?” Being a right-wing, dictatorial, foul-mouthed, racist, sexist billionaire is not a problem for the Democratic Party establishment, as long as the billionaire’s money finds its way into their own pockets.
What dominates the Democratic Party, no less than the Republicans under Trump, is the politics of oligarchy. It is naked and shameless.
The financial aristocrats, the multimillionaires and billionaires, control the two-party system and dictate the course of the stage-managed political events called “primaries,” “conventions” and “elections.”
Later this week, Bloomberg and Bernie Sanders are likely to appear on the same platform, if Bloomberg, as expected, qualifies for Wednesday’s Democratic debate in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Sanders claims that his campaign is the means to transform the Democratic Party into an instrument of progressive reform, a weapon against the rule of the super-rich. Bloomberg’s very presence on the debate platform will demonstrate the opposite—that the Sanders campaign is a “progressive” fig leaf for the oldest American capitalist party, which does the bidding of Wall Street and the CIA.
Patrick Martin
Message from Justice Democrats
Our first primary elections are just 16 days away. The next 16 days will be absolutely critical for our movement to elect diverse, working-class champions who will transform the Democratic Party.
If you’ve been waiting to make your first contribution to our movement, this is the best time to make your first donation.
Step up for the first time and contribute to power our movement and help us elect nine more progressive leaders to Congress.
If you've stored your info with ActBlue Express, we'll process your contribution instantly:
Contribute $15
Contribute $25
Contribute $50
Contribute $100
Contribute $250
Give another amount
JD does a lot for our endorsed candidates - we’re helping with organizing plans, boosting our candidates on social media, helping with their grassroots fundraising and so much more. Our work to elect these candidates depends on small-dollar contributions in response to emails just like this one.
Contribute for the first time to make sure that we have the resources necessary to push our movement forward and elect our endorsed candidates.
This movement is about all of us fighting for racial, social, economic, and environmental justice together. I know that we have the power to realize a true transformation of our democracy.
Thank you for all that you do,
Alexandra Rojas
Donate
Message from Central Arkansas Democratic Socialists of America
Hello Friends!
This Sunday, Feb 23 at 2:00pm we are going to be participating in a canvassing effort for Bernie Sanders.
We will meet at Arkansas Community Organizations
2101 S Main St at 2:00pm
There will be an orientation/training before we hit the streets.
Please RSVP at this link so that we can prepare properly for your participation:
https://events.berniesanders.com/event/237459/
This is the last weekend before Tuesday March 3rd - Arkansas voting date for the primaries. Talking to voters on their doorstep is one of the most important things you can do to help our campaign win. Every door knocked helps us grow our movement, turn Bernie supporters out to vote, and win this election in a landslide.
Note: You’ll need to bring a fully charged phone or tablet with the MiniVAN app downloaded. Please also remember to bring water and comfortable walking shoes.
You can find the MiniVAN app by searching for it in the app store.
See you there!
Your Co-Chairs
Liz, Ben & Greg
This is the last weekend before Tuesday March 3rd - Arkansas voting date for the primaries. Talking to voters on their doorstep is one of the most important things you can do to help our campaign win. Every door knocked helps us grow our movement, turn Bernie supporters out to vote, and win this election in a landslide.
Note: You’ll need to bring a fully charged phone or tablet with the MiniVAN app downloaded. Please also remember to bring water and comfortable walking shoes.
You can find the MiniVAN app by searching for it in the app store.
See you there!
Liz, Ben & Greg
Dems Should Do The Sensible Thing And Nominate A Moderate Rapacious Psychopath
[GREAT SATIRICAL OP-ED BY CAITLIN JOHNSTONE]
https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2020/02/17/op-ed-dems-should-do-the-sensible-thing-and-nominate-a-moderate-rapacious-psychopath/
by Caitlin Johnstone
Editor's note: In order to circumvent internet censorship, today's Caitlin Johnstone essay has been replaced with an op-ed by Snooty McCentrist of the National News Conglomerate. NNC: Obey.
After Bernie Sanders failed to impress in his underwhelming consecutive victories in Iowa and New Hampshire, it's time for his far-far-left extremist base to grow up and face reality: there's no way he can beat Trump. Especially with people like me churning out all these op-eds every day to make sure that he can't.
Face it, Democrats: Sanders is no frontrunner. As the always rational adult in the room Chris Matthews recently pointed out, if you compare his New Hampshire votes to the combined vote total of moderate candidates Pete Buttigieg, Joe Biden and Amy Klobuchar, he's actually trailing far behind. Sanders clocked in at a paltry 26 percent of total votes, while the triune electoral threegernaut Klobdenbutt amassed a whopping 53 percent. Now, you don't have to be Andrew Yang to figure out that 53 is more than 26.
That's not my opinion. That's math.
Wow this is bad news for Bernie Sanders when he runs against three people at once in the general. pic.twitter.com/t5mxnMPLwu
— jordan (@JordanUhl) February 13, 2020
If you can't take it from me, take it from the cold, hard numbers: if Democrats want to beat Trump, they need to nominate a centrist. Someone who rejects the extremes of Bernie's far left and Trump's far right and instead espouses sensible, middle-of-the-road values like endless war and military expansionism, rapacious ecocide, corrupt plutocracy, crushing domestic austerity measures, new cold war nuclear escalations, continued deregulation of sociopathic financial and commercial institutions, police militarization, unprecedented levels of imprisonment, Orwellian surveillance programs, internet censorship, and ever-mounting authoritarianism.
You know, the moderate position.
Because think about it, Bernie Bros: if you resist the DNC's attempt to elevate a sensible candidate like Mike Bloomberg to your party's nomination just because you don't want a racist Republican billionaire oligarch authoritarian with dozens of allegations of sexual misconduct against women to be your president, then you're stuck with Donald Trump.
Chew on that prospect for a minute.
Given that the progressive wing managed to get about 35% while the moderates totaled more than 52 percent, it is clear that the majority of the party is not eager to enter a political suicide pact with a self-described socialist promising a revolution. https://t.co/mFwi4If36G
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) February 12, 2020
You need to be more realistic, Bernie bros. How can Bernie possibly win when we're doing everything we can to prevent him from winning? We're telling you he's not electable, and no one would know better than us: we're the ones making sure he stays that way.
Seriously, stop being such insolent little shits. I'm here presenting very forceful arguments using a confident and assertive tone in a high-profile news outlet, and you're meant to obey. This is an op-ed. I have a professional headshot photo next to my name. That means you think what I tell you to think.
What exactly do you unwashed riff raff think democracy even is, anyway? Some kind of ponies-and-unicorns fantasy land where people get to just have the candidate they want to have, just because that's what most of them want? That kind of pie-in-the-sky dreaming is for people who don't have the entire billionaire media engine pointed at sabotaging them at every turn.
But if you give us a Mike Bloomberg, for example, we'll just let him sail right on through. Hell, if we can get two right-wing billionaires staging a made-for-TV kayfabe spat over the presidency from July to November we'll never stop amping that shit. Holy God, imagine the ratings!
Stop living in a childish fantasy world where the environment is real and war is something you need to think about and people shouldn't die if they don't have the correct imaginary numbers in their bank account. Let the realists whose entire worldview is built around made-up narratives and a make-believe economy tell you what to do.
Do as we say. Just do it. Just bend over and let us install a nice moderate psychopath, and this will be over before you know it. Relax, take a deep breath, and think nice, pleasant thoughts until November. Dream one of those wacky dreams you airy fairy hippies are always having, like having a real healthcare system or something.
Anyway, I'm going to send this off to my editor. The next fifty op-eds I write will be garment-rending outrage over the comments this one receives on Twitter.
Editor's note: In order to circumvent internet censorship, today's Caitlin Johnstone essay has been replaced with an op-ed by Snooty McCentrist of the National News Conglomerate. NNC: Obey.
After Bernie Sanders failed to impress in his underwhelming consecutive victories in Iowa and New Hampshire, it's time for his far-far-left extremist base to grow up and face reality: there's no way he can beat Trump. Especially with people like me churning out all these op-eds every day to make sure that he can't.
Face it, Democrats: Sanders is no frontrunner. As the always rational adult in the room Chris Matthews recently pointed out, if you compare his New Hampshire votes to the combined vote total of moderate candidates Pete Buttigieg, Joe Biden and Amy Klobuchar, he's actually trailing far behind. Sanders clocked in at a paltry 26 percent of total votes, while the triune electoral threegernaut Klobdenbutt amassed a whopping 53 percent. Now, you don't have to be Andrew Yang to figure out that 53 is more than 26.
That's not my opinion. That's math.
Wow this is bad news for Bernie Sanders when he runs against three people at once in the general. pic.twitter.com/t5mxnMPLwu
— jordan (@JordanUhl) February 13, 2020
If you can't take it from me, take it from the cold, hard numbers: if Democrats want to beat Trump, they need to nominate a centrist. Someone who rejects the extremes of Bernie's far left and Trump's far right and instead espouses sensible, middle-of-the-road values like endless war and military expansionism, rapacious ecocide, corrupt plutocracy, crushing domestic austerity measures, new cold war nuclear escalations, continued deregulation of sociopathic financial and commercial institutions, police militarization, unprecedented levels of imprisonment, Orwellian surveillance programs, internet censorship, and ever-mounting authoritarianism.
You know, the moderate position.
Because think about it, Bernie Bros: if you resist the DNC's attempt to elevate a sensible candidate like Mike Bloomberg to your party's nomination just because you don't want a racist Republican billionaire oligarch authoritarian with dozens of allegations of sexual misconduct against women to be your president, then you're stuck with Donald Trump.
Chew on that prospect for a minute.
Given that the progressive wing managed to get about 35% while the moderates totaled more than 52 percent, it is clear that the majority of the party is not eager to enter a political suicide pact with a self-described socialist promising a revolution. https://t.co/mFwi4If36G
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) February 12, 2020
You need to be more realistic, Bernie bros. How can Bernie possibly win when we're doing everything we can to prevent him from winning? We're telling you he's not electable, and no one would know better than us: we're the ones making sure he stays that way.
Seriously, stop being such insolent little shits. I'm here presenting very forceful arguments using a confident and assertive tone in a high-profile news outlet, and you're meant to obey. This is an op-ed. I have a professional headshot photo next to my name. That means you think what I tell you to think.
What exactly do you unwashed riff raff think democracy even is, anyway? Some kind of ponies-and-unicorns fantasy land where people get to just have the candidate they want to have, just because that's what most of them want? That kind of pie-in-the-sky dreaming is for people who don't have the entire billionaire media engine pointed at sabotaging them at every turn.
But if you give us a Mike Bloomberg, for example, we'll just let him sail right on through. Hell, if we can get two right-wing billionaires staging a made-for-TV kayfabe spat over the presidency from July to November we'll never stop amping that shit. Holy God, imagine the ratings!
Stop living in a childish fantasy world where the environment is real and war is something you need to think about and people shouldn't die if they don't have the correct imaginary numbers in their bank account. Let the realists whose entire worldview is built around made-up narratives and a make-believe economy tell you what to do.
Do as we say. Just do it. Just bend over and let us install a nice moderate psychopath, and this will be over before you know it. Relax, take a deep breath, and think nice, pleasant thoughts until November. Dream one of those wacky dreams you airy fairy hippies are always having, like having a real healthcare system or something.
Anyway, I'm going to send this off to my editor. The next fifty op-eds I write will be garment-rending outrage over the comments this one receives on Twitter.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)