Sunday, January 5, 2020

AMLO’s Attempt to Transform Mexico





Jeremy Corbyn lost the U.K. election but progressive Mexican leader Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, has been in power for one year. He is carrying out the plans described in his 2018 book “New Hope for Mexico,” writes Rick Sterling.


By Rick Sterling
TFA Report
With 129 million people, Mexico is the 10th most populous country in the world. It has the largest population of any Spanish speaking country and is twice the size of the United Kingdom.
Mexico is in a period of profound change. President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) and the Morena Party are charting a dramatically new path for the country.
From 2000 to 2005 Lopez Obrador was head of government for Mexico City. He left office with an 84 percent approval rating, according to one study, having implemented 80 percent of his campaign pledges. In 2006 he ran for the presidency as candidate of the PRD (Party of Democratic Revolution). The election was extremely controversial, with 49 percent of the population believing it was rigged against Lopez Obrador. Felipe Calderón was declared the winner.
In 2012 AMLO ran for president again. And again, there were widespread “irregularities” and Enrique Peña Nieto declared the winner. Following the election, AMLO founded a new party called the Movimiento de Regeneración Nacional (MORENA). 
Finally, in the 2018 election, AMLO decisively defeated the other candidates and his party, MORENA, won a majority in both the Chamber of Deputies and Senate. He assumed office on Dec. 1, 2018.
New Hope for Mexico

López Obrador analyzed Mexico’s problems and his solutions in the 2018 book “A New Hope for Mexico.” He describes how corruption and neoliberal politics have led to “rampant inequality, shocking poverty, frustration, resentment, hate, and violence.”
AMLO says, “In Mexico the governing class constitutes a gang of plunderers…the astounding dishonesty of the neoliberal period (from 1983 to the present) is wholly unprecedented.” He names the officials and oligarchs who have profited from privatizing public institutions. He describes how changes implemented under President Carlos Salinas even took away the right of children to free education.
López Obrador explains, “The first thing we must do is to democratize the state and retool it as an engine of political, economic and social growth. We must rid ourselves of the myth that development requires blind acquiescence to market forces… Mexico will not grow strong if our public institutions remain at the service of the wealthy elites.”
AMLO describes the decline of Mexico’s industrial infrastructure in the neoliberal period. Banks were bailed out while “neoliberal technocracy has led to partiality with respect to hiring, and always at the expense of unions. There have been massive waves of firings.”
AMLO describes ambitious plans: building sources of renewable energy and refineries to make the country energy self-sufficient; building a transportation corridor to move containers between the Atlantic and the Pacific Oceans; guaranteeing crop prices to enable food self-sufficiency; expanding tourism in the Caribbean, Mayan and Olmec regions; planting large areas with timber and fruit trees; giving loans to hundreds of thousands of small farmers; providing training and internships for youth.
He says that development is possible by cutting wasteful spending: “By cutting back on purchases of ships, planes and helicopters…[we will] sell those used by high ranking officials including the president; we will keep only those used for medical emergencies, security and public safety… The first priority must be serving the poor. Only through the creation of a just society will we achieve the revitalization of Mexico.”
He contrasts his goals for Mexico with those of the U.S., where the Trump administration has increased military spending while slashing spending on housing, transportation and education.
López Obrador believes neoliberal economic policies have been especially detrimental in villages and rural areas of Mexico. As a result of these policies, small farmers have lost their livelihoods and food imports have risen dramatically.  He writes, “The abandonment of our rural areas has taken a heavy toll on production, has increased migration, and fostered societal breakdown and violence.”

López Obrador says, “The crisis of public safety and violence that we face today is the product of a poorly conceived war on drugs that relies solely on coercive means. The security crisis that plagues Mexico is a result of a confluence of factors: poverty, injustice, and exclusion, aggravated by the inefficiency of the authorities and corruption within the police and the judiciary.”
He proposes to combat police and judicial corruption, to use the army and navy to protect public safety, to develop and utilize a National Guard, and to change laws regarding drug use. Above all, he emphasizes, it is necessary to provide positive alternatives for youth: “The belief that the deterioration of our social fabric can be combated only through use of force is profoundly wrong and highly dangerous, as Mexican history amply confirms.”
During his 2018 presidential campaign, López Obrador visited several U.S. cities to address Mexican Americans. His words are relevant for all Americans:
“We must convince and persuade those who were brainwashed by Trump’s campaign rhetoric… We must reach out to lower- and middle-class American workers, explaining that their problems are rooted in the poor distribution of income… We must raise awareness among Americans of good faith who have been tricked by the propaganda campaign against Mexicans and foreigners….”
One Year as President
After one year in office, the AMLO government has significant accomplishments: the minimum salary was dramatically increased while top government salaries and outlandish pensions were cut; small loans and grants are going directly to farmers; five key agricultural crops have a guaranteed price; the billion dollar gas-thieving cartel has been exposed and attacked; a $44 billion infrastructure plan has been launched; and programs to benefit youth, the disabled and elderly have begun.
AMLO sets an example of hard work and transparency. Each day begins with a 7 AM press conference broadcast on his twitter feed.  The presidential jet is up for sale and he flies on commercial airplanes. During this first year in office, he has not left the country but travels constantly within Mexico seeing the conditions of hospitals, schools, factories and the small cities and towns that make up so much of the country. The presidential palace has been opened to the public. 
While AMLO has a 67 percent approval rating, and is steadily implementing his campaign pledges, there are challenges and opposition. The Mexican economy has been near recession throughout the year. The bond rating for the state-owned oil company (Pemex) has been downgraded so that investment loans will be more expensive. Some major development plans have significant opposition. For example, indigenous organizations have opposed the proposed Maya Train. In response, AMLO says the project will only go ahead if the people want it.
Violence is still a major problem. As analyst Kurt Hackbarth has written, “The Mexican right is cynically using a crisis of its own making in an attempt to destabilize AMLO, taking Mexico’s people as hostages.”
The MORENA majority in Congress plans to legalize marijuana and create a federal agency to regulate its sale. But as Hackbarth says, “Legalization and the targeting of cartel finances must go hand in hand with the slow but necessary work of reestablishing the presence of a social state that decades of savage capitalism have allowed to wither: education, health care, housing, arts and culture, dignified alternatives to cartel employment, and an urgent redistribution of wealth…” These goals are precisely what is outlined in AMLO’s book and seemingly where he wants to go.

The changes in Mexico are also important on the international stage. Through most of the 20th century Mexico had a foreign policy of non-intervention and independence from Washington. They maintained relations with Cuba, supported the Sandinistas in Nicaragua, and broke relations with the Pinochet coup government in Chile. But in recent decades Mexican foreign policy has been subordinate to Washington. With AMLO and the MORENA Party in power, Mexico is returning to a foreign policy based on independence, self-determination and non-interference.
The difference was important early this year when the U.S. and Canada tried to impose a new government on Venezuela. The subordinate Latin American countries went along with Washington. Mexico did not.
As the recent coup in Bolivia unfolded, President Evo Morales’ life was threatened. Mexico sent a plane for his escape and granted him asylum. AMLO said to a huge crowd, “Evo was the victim of a coup d’etat! And from Mexico, we tell the world, ‘Yes to democracy, no to militarism!'”
As the Trump administration escalates its economic and political attacks on Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua, Mexico’s independent stance is especially important. AMLO’s administration has stood up against the U.S. at the Organization of American States and the anti-Venezuela Lima Group. Recently AMLO welcomed Ecuador’s former socialist leader Rafael Correa, followed by Cuba’s President Díaz-Canel. Argentina’s newly elected progressive president, Alberto Fernández, made his first foreign trip to meet AMLO.
Both internally and internationally, a new and hopeful process is happening in Mexico.







Trump, Iranian Leaders, Threaten War As Tensions Mount In Iraq



Carmine Sabia January 2, 2020



“…We are not afraid of any war and we tell America to speak correctly with the Iranian nation. We have the power to break them several times over and are not worried,”
The United States and Iran appear to be on a collision course towards an all-out armed conflict in the Middle East as tensions mount.
Attack And Counterattack
The latest escalation in the conflict between the two nations began on Friday when pro-Iran militia Kata’ib Hezbollah launched at attack on a US base near Kirkuk, Iraq, known as K1.
The attack took the life of a U.S contractor and wounded U.S. military on the base, the United States has claimed.
The United States military then responded to the attack by striking back at the militia in an attack that killed 25 of its fighters, the militia said.
This caused a heavy protest in Iraq at the U.S. embassy, the largest in the world, having more square footage than all of Vatican City.
Violent Protests
Protesters breached the walls of the compound, getting to the Compound Access Control facility and starting fires.
The demonstrators launched Molotov cocktails into the facility as its Ambassadors and staff huddled in safe rooms.
President Donald Trump sent Marines and Apache helicopters to assist Iraqi forces in protecting the embassy, very aware of the Benghazi attack and not wanting one on his watch.
His response drew praise from one of his staunchest allies, South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham.
“Very proud of President @realDonaldTrump acting decisively in the face of threats to our embassy in Baghdad. He has put the world on notice – there will be no Benghazis on his watch,” he said on Twitter.
“To the Iranian government: Be careful what you wish for — a country that depends on the ability to refine oil for its existence needs to be cautious.
“President Trump, unlike President Obama, will hold you accountable for threats against Americans and hit you where it hurts the most.   Choose your battles wisely.
“To our Iraqi allies: This is your moment to convince the American people the US-Iraq relationship is meaningful to you and worth protecting. Protect our American personnel. You will not regret it,” he said.
But Democrats saw the embassy protests as an indictment of the president’s Middle East policies.
Trump’s reckless decisions to walk away from the Iran Deal and now to launch airstrikes in Iraq without Iraqi government consent have brought us closer to war,” Sen Elizabeth Warren said.
Moving Towards War
The rhetoric from President Trump and Iranian leaders after the attacks and embassy protests are increasing in intensity as both are sabre rattling.
“Iran will be held fully responsible for lives lost, or damage incurred, at any of our facilities,” the president said on Twitter. “They will pay a very BIG PRICE! This is not a Warning, it is a Threat.”
Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Commander Brigadier General Hossein Salami said his nation does not want war but will not back away from a fight.
“We are not leading the country to war, but we are not afraid of any war and we tell America to speak correctly with the Iranian nation. We have the power to break them several times over and are not worried,” he said, Reuters reported.
His words were an echo of Iran’s Army chief Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi who said that his troops were ready for a fight.
“Our armed forces … monitor all moves, and if anyone makes the slightest mistake, they will decisively react, and if the situation heats up, we will show our abilities to the enemy,” he said.





UN concerned over British government's failure to investigate whether Assange has been subjected to psychological torture




UN concerned over British government's failure to investigate whether Assange has been subjected to psychological torture
UNITED NATIONS special rapporteur on torture Nils Melzer has written to governments to press them to investigate properly evidence that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been subjected to psychological torture.
On December 31 Mr Melzer shared on Twitter a letter that he had sent to the British government shaming its failure to address concerns that Mr Assange had been tortured.


(1/6) Just out: My letter to the #UK Govt of 29 Oct 2019, detailing serious due process violations, expressing alarm at #Assange’s detention conditions & health, reiterating my queries & calling for his prompt release. Direct link: http://bit.ly/2ZCygWA  (60 days & no response)

The letter, dated October 29, did not receive a response. He has also written to the United States, Swedish and Ecuadorian governments.
The US is seeking Mr Assange’s extradition to face spying charges. The whistleblower has been detained since his arrest in April at the Ecuadorean embassy in London. He had been confined there since 2012 after being granted asylum by the South American country.
At the time Mr Assange was a wanted man in Sweden, having failed to respond to demands for him to return there to face questioning over sexual assault charges. He claimed that Sweden would simply ship him out to a vengeful US, angered by his whistleblowing activities. The assault charges were eventually dropped.
In his tweet Mr Melzer accused the British government of “seriously undermining the credibility of the UK’s commitment to the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment, as well as to the rule of law more generally.”
He said that “recurring and serious” due-process violations in Britain have rendered Mr Assange’s case “inherently arbitrary, to the point of making any legal remedies a pointless formality devoid of prospect.”
Mr Melzer called on the government to retract its extradition authorisation and release him from prison “without further delay.”
Anti-war campaigner John Rees told the Star yesterday: “Obviously it is a very important intervention from a very high-authority source, but it is not news to anyone who has visited Assange in Belmarsh high-security prison, as I have.
“The conditions he is being kept in are unacceptable and there is absolutely no doubt that the prison regime is directly causing deterioration of his health.”
Mr Rees said it was Home Secretary Priti Patel’s responsibility to intervene.
“The judge has already expressed concern that [Mr Assange’s] legal team are not getting access to their client,” he said. “Both these things are of the most serious nature, it jeopardises any fair hearings coming up in February.”
Former Derby North MP Chris Williamson tweeted: “The UK government’s treatment of Julian Assange continues to shame Britain.”
Mr Melzer’s call comes as journalist Vaughan Smith told RT that an “obviously sedated” Mr Assange said he was “slowly dying here” during a Christmas Eve phone call between the two friends.
Mr Smith said Mr Assange sounded like a shell of the man he once.
“His speech was slurred. He was speaking slowly,” Mr Smith said. “Now, Julian is highly articulate, a very clear person when he speaks. And he sounded awful. It was very upsetting to hear him.”





Atlantic current could falter before 2100


The Atlantic current won’t come to a full stop the day after tomorrow. But it could face a temporary halt later this century.


By Tim Radford




https://climatenewsnetwork.net/atlantic-current-could-falter-before-2100/







The Atlantic current won’t come to a full stop the day after tomorrow. But it could face a temporary halt later this century.

LONDON, 3 January, 2020 − European scientists think they have settled one of the more alarming questions of the climate crisis: the potential collapse of the Atlantic current, the Gulf Stream that delivers heat from the tropics to the Arctic.

The answer is clear. Total collapse is not likely for another 1000 years. But there is roughly a one in six chance in the next century that the flow of the north Atlantic current may temporarily halt or falter because of climate change.

That is because faster melting of the Greenland ice cap, and more freshwater in the Arctic Ocean, could trigger a slowdown in what scientists like to call the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation.

And a team of US researchers has separately highlighted one of the potential mechanisms of ocean change: for every 1°C rise in average global temperature, there will be roughly six days fewer on which many of the world’s rivers are frozen, which will mean more freshwater in the northern seas.

The findings are based in the first case on sophisticated use of computer simulations, and in the second on the careful study of 400,000 satellite images collected over more than 30 years.


“The Dutch scientists now think that the likelihood of even a temporary halt is only 15%. This is more or less the chance offered in the grim game of Russian roulette”

Researchers from the universities of Groningen and Utrecht say, in the journal Scientific Reports, that they modelled the likelihood and impact of small changes in the flow of freshwater into the ocean at high latitudes.

The Atlantic current – sometimes called the Gulf Stream – is a massive flow of warm, salty water from the tropics to the Arctic that keeps northwestern Europe much warmer than, for example, the same latitudes of North America.

As the water flows north, it cools and becomes more dense, and begins to sink below the fresh meltwater of the summer Arctic: the cold, dense, salty water then flows along the sea bed southwards, and this one dramatic global oceanic conveyor belt ultimately delivers nutrients and dissolved oxygen to the Southern Ocean. It also stores dissolved carbon dioxide, distributes heat and moderates high latitude weather.

But in the past 150 years the flow has been weakening, and there have been fears that the circulation could halt entirely, with unforeseeable consequences. This notional failure became the trigger for a 2004 disaster movie called The Day After Tomorrow. Something so sudden and catastrophic as the Hollywood version was never going to happen – but there have been repeated fears that the weakening could continue, and tip the planet’s climate into a new and potentially dangerous state.

The Dutch scientists now think that the likelihood of even a temporary halt is only 15%. This is more or less the chance offered in the grim game of Russian roulette, in which a player spins a six-chambered revolver with one bullet in it, and points it at his or her head.

River ice lost

Their model simulated small changes in the delivery of freshwater. This is likely to accelerate however, according to research in the journal Nature. Researchers combed through 407,880 satellite pictures taken between 1984 and 2018, to find that 56% of rivers were affected by winter freezing, which masked altogether 87,000 square kilometres of water surface.

Freezing is important to both humans and wild things: frozen rivers traditionally have provided good surfaces for ground transport in the high latitudes. The act of freezing also regulates greenhouse gas emissions that would otherwise escape from the rivers. Ice-jams during the spring melt can trigger flooding, which – though damaging to human settlements – spreads fresh water, nutrients and sediments around the flood plains.

But these benefits are at risk. The researchers found that river and lake surfaces were freezing ever later, as global temperatures crept up, and that the world had lost 2.5% of its river ice in the last 30 years.

If the world’s nations stick to the agreement reached in Paris in 2015 and contain global heating to just 2°C above the average for most of human history, then by the end of the century the world could see a reduction of another 16 days in the length of ice cover, compared with the present, they calculate.

If they achieve the Paris ideal of no more than 1.5°C, this extra ice-free period could be reduced to just over seven days. Right now, global average temperatures are already 1°C above the historic average, and the planet is on course for a warming by the end of the century of more than 3°C.




− Climate News Network


Amazon threatens to fire employees who speak out on climate



Amazon Tries to Shut Down Climate Speech: 

Amazon has threatened to fire some employees who are continuing to speak out on climate change, an employee activist group said Thursday. 

Amazon Employees For Climate Justice posted a statement on Twitter saying that several of its members had been contacted by representatives from human resources about speaking out on climate in relation to the company's external communication policy. 

The Washington Post reports that a lawyer for Amazon sent an email to two employees quoted in an October Post story on Amazon and climate action, advising them that further "violation" of the policy could "result in formal corrective action, up to and including termination of your employment with Amazon." 

One of the threatened employees, Maren Costa, said "This is not the time to shoot the messengers." 

Amazon Employees for Climate Justice made headlines last year after thousands of employees signed an open letter criticizing the company's lack of action on climate while it courted the oil and gas industry. 

Flashback: Rep. Bernie Sanders Opposes Iraq War




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_om-x323Em0&t=30s























ONE MONTH TO THE IOWA CAUCUS: WATERLOO CANVASS LAUNCH




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRTbKKxb5G4