Thursday, November 14, 2019

“No No You Guys, THIS US-Backed Coup Is Perfectly Legitimate!”



Caitlin Johnstone



I just keep tripping on how dumb this latest US-backed military coup is. It’s in Bolivia in case you’ve lost track, which would be perfectly understandable since US-backed coups have become kind of like US mass shootings–there’s so many of them they’re starting to blend into each other.
I mean, for starters the justifications for this one are so cartoonishly reachy and desperate it boggles the mind a bit. The main argument you’ll see in favor of the coup is that Evo Morales was elected after Bolivia’s high court ruled that he could run for a fourth term, but the (democratically elected) court ruled against a 2016 referendum on presidential term limits.
That’s it. That weird, pedantic appeal to a particular interpretation of bureaucratic technicalities is the whole entire argument in support of a literal military coup backed by the United States.
And make no mistake, that’s exactly what this was: the military ousting a government is precisely the thing that a coup is. The coup’s Christian fascist leader Luis Fernando Camacho openly tweeted that the military was actively pursuing Morales’ arrest prior to the ousted leader’s escape to Mexico, a tweet he later deleted presumably because the admission makes it much harder to call this military coup anything other than the thing that it is. The Grayzone has published an article documenting this coup’s many ties to Washington. Put it all together, and you’ve got a US-backed military coup.


Camacho has deleted the tweet Golinger links to openly admitting that the military were pursuing the arrest of ousted Bolivian president Evo Morales. Luckily it's been archived here: http://archive.is/iSq8U  https://twitter.com/evagolinger/status/1193704121565696000 …



As happens every single time the US tries to overthrow a government these days, social media is currently swarming with small, brand-new and suspicious-looking accounts, many of which are publishing the same words verbatim, all defending and supporting the coup. Some of them try to argue that Morales rigged last month’s election, but that’s totally bogus and evidence-free. Others try to claim that “the people” of Bolivia opposed Morales, strongly implying that he was universally loathed, but that claim is invalidated by the election results and the massive demonstrations against the coup.
So the only actual argument really boils down to “Well he ran for another term, and yeah he won, and yeah the democratically elected high court ruled he could run again, but a loud and violent minority of Bolivians don’t want him to be president. What choice do you have in such circumstances other than to support a literal military coup?”
Which is just so crazy. That’s how low the bar has sunk for supporting the toppling of a government today. They don’t have to claim he’s starving his own people. They don’t have to claim that he’s using chemical weapons. They don’t have to claim that he’s governing without the consent of the voting populace. Just “Yeah well some of us don’t like him and there’s some paperwork we disagree on.”
I mean really, how much lower can the bar get for when a US-backed military coup is justified? “Oh, that government needed to be toppled because the leader got a parking ticket once”? “Well the president wore white after Labor Day, and that’s a fashion atrocity”?
So the Morales-supporting line of succession has been ousted and many of his supporters in the government arrested by masked men, and now the US-approved interim president is an appalling racist and absolute dimwit who calls to mind a very low-budget Bolivian version of Sarah Palin.


Bolivian Sarah Palin is the nation's new US-approved interim president. https://twitter.com/historic_ly/status/1194758297334755328 …



It’s absolutely amazing how many people all across the political spectrum have been sucked in by this ridiculousness. How lost do you have to be to believe that this US-backed military coup is different from all the others? How many times is Charlie Brown going to run up and try to kick Lucy’s football?
That bitch is never gonna let you kick that goddamn football, Charlie Brown. And this US-backed military coup isn’t going to be any more moral, legal or beneficial than all the others.


The Bolivian opposition, @OAS_official, US government and mainstream media manufactured a phony narrative of election fraud, setting the stage for the fascist coup against @evoespueblo. I explain how it happened:



Anti-Coup Lawmakers in Bolivia Hold a Session in the Assembly




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpUgeieCRj4&feature




















Message from John Feffer Director, FPIF



The impeachment hearings began this week in Washington, DC with opening salvos from both Democrats and Republicans, plus testimony from two top-level government officials in charge of Ukraine policy.

Or, at least, they were supposed to be in charge of Ukraine policy. As it turns out, both the president and his errand boy Rudy Giuliani had hijacked Ukraine policy to serve Trump's reelection campaign.

Everybody but the Republican Party and the president's ardent supporters believe that this hijacking is an impeachable offense. Unfortunately, that's more or less who controls the Senate. But there's always the possibility that the impeachment hearings turn up something so ghastly that even the members of the president's personality cult will reconsider their religious affiliation.

This last weekend was the 30th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. In my World Beat column this week, I consider the possibility that this iconic event set into motion a set of developments that has ultimately produced a Trump presidency (among other assorted ills).

Also this week at Foreign Policy In Focus, columnist Walden Bello embarks on a multi-part examination of China as a global power, beginning with an assessment of its use of force.

And Ryan Michael Kehoe looks at the role literature plays in fostering empathy across various divides around the world.

John Feffer

Director, FPIF

JERNEJ KALUŽA, lecture in Ljubljana


Filozofski institut ZRC SAZU


Series of public lectures
Every second Monday, at 19.00, from November to the end of May at the new post, Robba Street 15, Ljubljana

Monday, November 18 at 19:00
BIG LITTLE MAN INTERNET subsoil • lectures JERNEJ KALUŽA

As Adorno argued, in the heart of "personalized fascist propaganda" lies the concept of "little big man", which is both remarkable and all-powerful, but also generic individual, one of many. Jernej Kaluza will try to present the genealogy of the discourse that addresses this type of exceptional individuals - generic, but paradoxically also the singular reader is able to understand the hypocrisy prevailing morality and decadency existing elite. It will be devoted to how to perform the functions discourse on the "little big man" from the inside. Will try to show: 1) how this discourse effectively spajdaši the myth of "personal ascent" underlying "American dream", 2) how it fits with the web, micro-celebrity culture, and 3) how it manifests itself within the 'intellectual' dark web 'or the network "alternative influencerjev"

FREE!





Keiser Report: Cash and debt pile (E1462)




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a26knrKqGy4&feature=em-uploademail






















Global Capitalism: The Economics of Taxing Wealth [November 2019]




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THwqz5dTzkA&feature=em-uploademail





















The Great Distraction




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1z36mHK7irc&feature=em-lbcastemail