Wednesday, October 23, 2019

‘There Is No Hope’: Crisis Pushes Haiti to Brink of Collapse






Kirk Semple. New York Times. October 21, 2019

LÉOGÂNE, Haiti — The small hospital was down to a single day’s supply of oxygen and had to decide who would get it: the adults recovering from strokes and other ailments, or the newborns clinging to life in the neonatal ward.

Haiti’s political crisis had forced this awful dilemma — one drama of countless in a nation driven to the brink of collapse.

A struggle between President Jovenel Moïse and a surging opposition movement demanding his ouster has led to violent demonstrations and barricaded streets across the country, rendering roads impassable and creating a sprawling emergency.

Caught in the national paralysis, officials at Sainte Croix Hospital were forced to choose who might live and who might die. Fortunately, a truck carrying 40 fresh tanks of oxygen made it through at the last minute, giving the hospital a reprieve.

“It was scary, really scary,” said Archdeacon Abiade Lozama of the Episcopal Church of Haiti, which owns the hospital. “Every day, things become more difficult, day after day.”

Though the country has been trapped for years in cycles of political and economic dysfunction, many Haitians say the current crisis is worse than anything they have ever experienced. Lives that were already extremely difficult, here in the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere, have become even more so.

Weeks of unrest around Haiti, coupled with rampant corruption and economic malaise, have led to soaring prices, a disintegration of public services and a galloping sense of insecurity and lawlessness. At least 30 people have been killed in the demonstrations in the past few weeks, including 15 by police officers, according to the United Nations.

“There is no hope in this country,” said Stamène Molière, 27, an unemployed secretary in the southern coastal town of Les Cayes. “There’s no life anymore.”

Gas shortages are worsening by the day. Hospitals have cut services or closed entirely. Public transportation has ground to a halt. Businesses have shuttered. Most schools have been closed since early September, leaving millions of children idle. Widespread layoffs have compounded chronic poverty and hunger. Uncertainty hangs over everything.

Many Haitians with the means to flee have left or are planning to, while most who remain are simply trying to figure out where they are going to get their next meals.

Haiti was once a strategic ally for the United States, which often played a crucial role here. During the Cold War, American governments supported — albeit at times grudgingly — the authoritarian governments of François Duvalier and his son, Jean-Claude Duvalier, because of  their anti-Communist stance.

In 1994, the Clinton administration sent troops to restore Jean-Bertrand Aristide to power after his ouster as president, but 10 years later, intense pressure from the United States helped push Mr. Aristide out again.

Now, protesters are criticizing the United States for continuing to stand by Mr. Moïse. The Trump administration has urged respect for the democratic process, but has said little about the unrest in Haiti.

“If you look at Haitian history, governments are overthrown when the United States turns on them,” said Jake Johnston, a research associate at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

The current crisis is a culmination of more than a year of violent protests, and the product, in part, of political acrimony that has seized the nation since Mr. Moïse, a businessman, took office in February 2017 following an electoral process that was marred by delays, allegations of voter fraud and an abysmal voter turnout.

Outrage over allegations that the government misappropriated billions of dollars meant for social development projects provided the initial impetus for the protests. But opposition leaders have sought to harness the anger to force his ouster, calling for his resignation and the formation of a transitional government.

The protests intensified in early September, at times turning violent and bringing the capital, Port-au-Prince, and other cities and towns around the country to a standstill.

“We’re not living,” Destine Wisdeladens, 24, a motorcycle-taxi driver, said at a protest march in Port-au-Prince this month. “There is no security in the country. There’s no food. There’s no hospitals. There’s no school.”

Mr. Moïse has been defiant, saying in public comments last week that it would be “irresponsible” for him to resign. He has named a commission of politicians to explore solutions to the crisis.

Amid the current turmoil, daily routines, never a sure thing in this vulnerable country, have been thrown even more deeply into doubt.

With public transportation having ground to a halt, Alexis Fritzner, 41, a security guard making about $4 per day, walks about 10 miles each way to work at a clothing factory in Port-au-Prince. He has not been paid for more than a month, he said, yet he still goes to work for fear of being fired.

“It’s because there are no other options,” he said.

The mounting problems at Sainte Croix Hospital here in Léogâne are emblematic of the crisis. Though the town is only about 20 miles from Port-au-Prince, near-daily barricades have impeded traffic. Suppliers in the capital have been forced to close or have had trouble receiving imports, making medicine hard to get.

At least one patient at the hospital died in recent days because of a lack of crucial medicine, said the Rev. Jean Michelin St.-Louis, the hospital’s general manager.

It has been hard to wrangle fuel to run the hospital’s generators, its only power supply, he said. At times, ambulances have been blocked from crossing the barricades despite promises from protest leaders to the contrary. Some of the hospital’s staff members, including the chief surgeon, have not always been able to make it to work because of the protests.

“It’s the first time I’ve been through such a difficult experience,” Father St.-Louis, 41, said.

The crisis is particularly stark in Les Cayes, the most populous city in southern Haiti, which has effectively been cut off from the capital by barricades on the main road.

The city endured a total blackout for nearly two months. The power company started to mete out electricity again earlier this month, though in tiny increments — a few hours on one day, a few more on another.

The city’s public hospital shut down recently when protesters, angry over the death of one of their comrades, smashed its windows and destroyed cars in its parking lot. After the attack, the staff fled, said Herard Marc Rocky, 37, the hospital’s head of logistics.

Even before the riot, the hospital was barely functioning. For three weeks, it had been without power after running out of fuel for its generators.

Archdeacon Lozama, 39, who oversees an Episcopal parish in Les Cayes, said demonstrators forbid him from holding services on two recent Sundays. “We couldn’t open the doors,” he said. “People would burn the church.”

Thieves have stolen the batteries from solar panels that provide electricity to the parish school. The keyboardist in the church music ensemble was recently wounded by a stray bullet. And protesters manning a barricade took food that Archdeacon Lozama was delivering by truck on behalf of an international charity.

“There’s no one you can call,” he lamented. “There’s no one in charge.”

People, he said, are desperate. “As they have nothing, they can destroy everything. They have nothing to lose.”

Intersections throughout Les Cayes are scarred with the remains of burned barricades made with wood, tires and other debris, vestiges of near-daily protests.

“I’m hiding out here, I’m hunkering down, I’m not even on my porch,” said Marie Prephanie Pauldor Delicat, 67, the retired headmistress of a kindergarten in Les Cayes. “I’m scared of the people.”

Shop owners say sales have plummeted. Violent demonstrations have forced them to curtail their hours, and it has become harder to restock merchandise.

Several regional opposition leaders, in an interview at a dormant nightclub in Les Cayes, blamed infiltrators sympathetic to the government for the violence. But they defended the roadblocks, saying they helped thwart the movement of security forces accused of aggressions against residents.

“We get the support of the population despite it all, because all the population has the same demand: the departure of Jovenel Moïse,” said Anthony Cyrion, a lawyer.

A wellspring of opposition in Les Cayes is La Savane, one of its most forlorn neighborhoods, where simple, rough-hewed homes line unpaved roads and the stench of open sewers commingles with the salty perfume of the Caribbean Sea.

On a visit this month, reporters from The New York Times were surrounded by crowds of desperate and angry residents, each with a list of grievances against the government and accounts of utter despair.

One young man opened his shirt to reveal a bullet wound in his shoulder. Another showed where a bullet had hit his leg. They blamed the police.

“We are all victims in many ways!” shouted Lys Isguinue, 48. “We are victims under the sticks of the police! We are victims of tear gas! We are victims because we cannot eat! We are victims because we cannot sleep!”

Venise Jules fights complete despair, and the hope that propelled her to vote for Mr. Moïse has vanished. “He said everything would change,” she recalled. “We would have food on our plates, we would have electricity 24/7, we would have jobs for our children and salaries would increase.”
Venise Jules, 55, a cleaning woman at a grade school and the mother of Ms. Molière, the unemployed secretary, said her entire family had voted for Mr. Moïse.

“He said everything would change,” she recalled. “We would have food on our plates, we would have electricity 24/7, we would have jobs for our children and salaries would increase.”

Ms. Jules, three of her five children and a cousin live in a narrow house in La Savane made from mud and stone. The corrugated metal roof leaks when it rains. The bathroom is an outhouse with a hole in the ground. With no running water, the family has to fill buckets at a public tap several blocks away.

They cook over coal — when they have something to cook.

“I didn’t put anything on the fire today,” Ms. Jules said. It had been a full day since she had eaten anything.

With the schools closed, Ms. Jules had been without work — or an income — for weeks. Even when she worked, earning $47 per month, she had not been able to amass any savings. Now she sends her children to eat at the homes of friends with something to spare.

Her despair, she said, has driven her to consider suicide.

On a recent evening, she sat with Ms. Molière, her daughter, in their house as it sank into the shadows of the night. Ms. Molière began to cry softly. Seeing her tears, Ms. Jules began to cry as well.

“It’s not only that we’re hungry for bread and water,” Ms. Molière said. “We’re hungry for the development of Haiti.”

“Haiti is very fragile,” she said.





Talking Like a Mining Company: The Escobal Mine in Guatemala






Nicholas Copeland. NACLA. October 15, 2019

The Escobal Mine, located in eastern Guatemala, is the second-largest silver mine in the world and the source of one of the most protracted environmental conflicts in Guatemala. Mining activities have been suspended by direct action from the community resistance movement, and by order of the Constitutional Tribunal since mid-2017.

In 2018, the Constitutional Court (CC) declared that the Ministry of Energy and Mining (MEM) had breached the Xinka Peoples’ right to consultation by awarding the mining license without considering international obligations under International Labor Organization Treaty 169. The Court ordered that MEM carry out a consultation process, which as soon as it was finished, would permit the mine to resume operations. The ruling left several key questions unanswered:

Who should be consulted?
What is the area of influence of the mine?
What is the meaning and nature of the process of state-led consultation?
Of central importance is the fact that this ruling did not recognize the legitimacy of community-led consultations carried out over the past eight years, principally under municipal jurisdiction, which demonstrated overwhelming opposition to the mine in surrounding communities. A more robust concept of consultation that holds that the mine has to close definitively predominates at the local level. Since the ruling, there has been a conflict between the community conception and the meaning of consultation promoted by the mine. The two groups seek to influence the process ordered by the tribunal, forwarding irreconcilable answers to the three questions above, with distinct mechanisms at their disposal. President Jimmy Morales recently said the consultation required to restart the mine will be completed before he leaves office in January.

Sociopolitical and territorial reality is a product of an asymmetrical dialectical struggle between incompatible visions and competing strategies. The community resistance uses a variety of peaceful opposition methods: protests, public debate, appeals to logic, legal denunciations, direct action to stop mining activity, political alliance with the catholic church and national and international NGOs, and legal strategies based in Indigenous rights. They have maintained a constant blockade against the entry of mining materials since 2017, and launched a campaign to re-vindicate the Xinka identity before the 2018 census. Now, 268,223 people counted in the census identity as Xinka, up from 16,214 in 2002. In addition, they have sought assistance from scientists to conduct independent environmental impact analysis, especially studies of water.

On the other side, the mine proclaims itself as a motor of regional development and has given gifts to various affected communities in order to gain their support or silence critics. They affirm their environmental analysis, which downplays the negative effects of the mine. Before the Court ruling, they bought radio ads saying, “the Xinka people do not exist.” Even more concerning, the mine has pursued a criminalization campaign against the community resistance. In 2013, security forces attacked peaceful demonstrators with firearms, killing two and wounding 11 more. Many members of the resistance have been assaulted and threatened, or unjustly incarcerated for months. The mining company is in the process of manipulating the consultation process with the complicity of the state.

On August 8, 2019, the Xinka Parliament denounced the Ministry of Energy and Mining (MEM) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MARN) announcement that only the Municipal Development Council (COMUDE) would participate in the pre-consultation phase, a decision that aligned with the reduced definition of the area of influence that was illegally determined before the consultation process. They began the consultation with the COMUDE representatives despite the fact that the Constitutional Court clearly stated that the COMUDES are not legal representatives of the Xinka Parliament. The Parliament urged the General Prosecutor to sue MARN and MEM for failure to comply with due process, perjury, and influence trafficking. They also appealed to the Supreme Court of Justice. There have not been adequate responses to their complaints and MEM continues to work with the reduced area of influence and without the participation of Xinka authorities. Worse still, they have augmented attacks on the resistance. August 25 was the 8th anniversary of the first consultation, but the process currently underway does not at all represent the spirit of the original. In response to the discriminatory and unconstitutional process, on September 3—the anniversary of the Constitutional Court’s decision—the resistance marched in the capital to demand their rights, affirming that if the process continues in this way, it will not have legitimacy.

A Public Investigation

The constrast between the culture of extractive capitalism represented by the mine and the alternative conceptions of the community resistance were on display in Guatemala City at the end of February 2019, when the Center for Conservation Studies (CECON-USAC) presented a multidisciplinary study of the impact of the Escobal Mine before a packed crowd. The mine’s desire to shrink the right to consultation was visible.

The CECON study, Desigualdad, Extractivsmo y Desarrollo en Santa Rosa y Jalapa, conducted by a team of five young Guatemalan professionals and financed by Oxfam Guatemala, was oriented toward the common good and human and Indigenous rights, and painted a gloomy picture of the environmental, economic, social and psychological effects of the mine, all borne by the public as externalities, and for which the mine has assumed very limited responsibility. It provided strong support for the community opposition.

Using graphs, maps, and images and guided in a multidimensional conception of poverty, the researchers detailed the failures and risks of the mine. The mine only created a small number of jobs and had a minimal effect on local poverty. The budget for the mine closure was wildly optimistic; the mine dug giant tunnels—two km—in the upper part of a watershed and a water system that is the recharge zone for a regional aquifer. Dozens of freshwater springs have dried up in villages above the mine and there is a high probability that the mine is contributing to a rise in arsenic in the regional water system.

In order to empty the tunnels to reach the silver vein, the mine consumes 255 gallons of water per minute, and 2.8 million cubic liters per year, lowering the water table and doing long-term damage to the watershed. Furthermore, the mine has led an entire village, La Cuchilla, to be condemned, such that the residents fit the UN definition of internally displaced persons. For these reasons, the study concluded that the mine has generated conflicts that have left the local population traumatized, living with stress and uncertainty. The study also criticizes MARN and MEM for not having conducted an adequate analysis of risk and failing in its regulatory function.

The study repeatedly questions the ethics and logic of installing, without previous consultation, a mine in the upper part of a watershed that is the source of water for several towns, in a region where arsenic exists in a natural form in the subsoil, such that it can easily enter into the water system due to mining activity that grinds the rock and exposes it to water and oxygen.

The mine is therefore a producer of anti-freedom, anti-development, and inequality, because it ignores integrated solutions and excludes the people from consideration. It offers gifts and jobs, but in exchange for risk, unbearable noise, harassment, division, negation of identity, massive transformation of the territory, and systematic exposure to harm. It aggravates inequality in several dimensions. This analysis could apply in good measure to many of the megadevelopment projects in Guatemala.

It is rare that a megaproject in Guatemala is submitted to an academic and scientific batter so complete and sustained by a public institution. The fact that CECON’s offices were robbed four times in January, the month prior to the publication of the study, underscores the importance of its conclusions.

Due to the fact that I had arranged for a water systems engineer from Virginia Tech, Dr. Leigh Anne Krometis, and her doctoral student, Cristina Marcillo, to conduct a monitoring of the surface water systems around the mine that contributed to the study, they invited me to the panel of commentators.

The Mine Speaks

The first comments were given by John Serna, the previous director of sustainability for Tahoe Resources, the former owner of the mine, and now with Pan American Silver—a Canadian mining company and one of the largest silver mine operators in the world—the new owners. Serna’s presentation provided a vivid example of how mining companies engage directly and publicly with organized and dedicated indigenous critics, and how this “dialogue” is part of a public relations strategy to overcome opposition. It opens a window to understanding how they insist that the world must be understood—as a strategy for the following phase of court ordered consultation, to make the world adjust to their vision.

Serna began by “accepting,” in a general and vague form, the findings: “We [the mine] share in good measure the conclusions and recommendations,” but at the same time, extolled the superiority of the mining company in the domain of science, offering to share data from 11 monitoring points generated since 2009. The clear but subtle implication was that their additional and superior data would complicate the picture beyond what had been presented by the study. Nevertheless, he affirmed that the mine was open to accepting the findings “in good part,” just as they hoped that the authors of the study, and their other critics, would be open to their data. Despite the fact that he “accepted” the criticism, he presented its findings as completely consistent with the continued operation of the mine.

Furthermore, Serna positioned the mine as an “actor in the territory” together with the Xinka “population,” with a future ahead of it, minimizing the economic and political power of the mine: “we are not really that big and powerful.” He insinuated the possibility of a better redistribution of the benefits of the mine and the efforts to “mitigate” the situation in La Cuchilla in order to “close the wounds” and begin a “process of reconciliation in the territory” so that the mine can be “part of the solution, not only a problem.” He presented the continued existence of the mine as necessary for the creation of a just and inclusive society, a vision that excluded—definitively—the possibility of closure.

A large measure of the political force of his presentation regarded what he left without saying. He never mentioned the Xinka people or the Xinka Parliament by name, an effort to predefine the consultation ordered by the Constitutional Court that they consider inside the “area of influence”. He was also careful not to mention Treaty 169 of the International Labor Organization—not even the word “consultation”—which implies Indigenous rights. He specifically invited municipal mayors to “dialogue” about the future of the region, and unspecified “Xinka populations.”

He closed his presentation with a quote from Pope Francis’s encyclical that called on humans to unite behind sustainable development, positioning the continued existence of the mine as completely compatible with this philosophy.

Critical here is that the company, although generally recognizing damages, accepted no fiscal or legal responsibility for the ecological or social harm, denied the structural nature of the problems and promised to continue mining operations. The community has expressly refused such “dialogue” and the mine for years, and furthermore those efforts are prohibited during the consultation process, undermining it as a process free from coercion for the communities.

It is impossible that the mine operate and continue to expand without consuming great quantities of water that damage the watershed ecosystem and regional economies. Beyond the risk of acid mine drainage, there are sociocultural aspects, the economic impacts, the human costs of criminalization, the demonization and violence against the community resistance. Environmental destruction and conflict are fundamental to the existence of the mine; these are not things that can be simply wished away. Those effects are incompatible with the concept of development advanced by community organizations, which focus generally on agriculture for subsistence and market, the human right to water and a healthy environment.

The members of the resistance were happy to hear the results of the study, which resonated with their lived experience. They felt publicly vindicated. But they were also angered, although not surprised, by Serna’s arrogance. Speaking among themselves, they criticized how he had twisted the Pope’s words about sustainable development to justify the mine. They compared Serna’s declarations to those of a person who enters someone’s house, kills their family members, and then asks for forgiveness and to stay. They wanted the mine to disappear, period. They were unbreakable and were ready to risk their lives to stop the mine. In their minds, little had changed.

This story underscores how public independent investigatiosn directed by a functional public sector can inform debates about development models and help communities harmed by extractive industries. If indeed public investigations have grave limitations and obstacles in Guatemala, part of the struggle is to make it so that studies like these over the socio-environmental impacts strengthen the right to consultation, and the sovereignty of Indigenous peoples. For now, these matters appear separated, in the courts, but not for the communities.

Nicholas Copeland is a cultural anthropologist, teaches American Indian Studies and social theory in the Department of Sociology at Virginia Tech, and is part of the Guatemalan Water Network (REDAGUA). He is also the author of The Democracy Development Machine: Neoliberalism, Radical Pessimism, and Authoritarian Populism in Mayan Guatemala (Cornell University Press, 2019). Available open access.





Guatemala to Remain Taiwan’s Ally, Says President-Elect






EFE. October 21, 2019

TAIPEI – The president-elect of Guatemala said Monday that the Central American country will not change its diplomatic relations in favor of China but continue to remain Taiwan’s ally.

Alejandro Giammattei made the statement in Taipei during an official visit to the island, which began on Sunday and is expected to conclude on Thursday.

“The only thing our presence (in Taiwan) does is send a message to the world that Guatemala is on Taiwan’s side and that together we will face the great challenges that we have,” Giammattei said during a visit to the office of Taiwanese president Tsai Ing-wen.

The president-elect’s statement comes after Taiwan recently lost two of its international allies – the Solomon Islands and Kiribati – in a similar fashion to Panama, Dominican Republic and El Salvador, which since 2016 have broken off diplomatic ties with Taipei in favor of Beijing.

The Guatemalan delegation to the island included four members of the next government under Giammattei, and two elected representatives, Maynor Mejia and Guillermo Alberto Cifuentes Barragan.

Tsai welcomed one of her few remaining allies during the visit that came barely two months after Giammattei’s election.

The Taiwanese president said the visit underlined the friendship and close ties between the two countries and the importance that Giammatei places on it.

Tsai is set to contest elections to be re-elected to office in January next year.

Giammattei expressed his wish to enhance cooperation with Taiwan with regard to agriculture, security and health, while the Taiwanese leader spoke of working with Guatemala on smart cities and smart agriculture.

During his trip, Giammattei is also expected to visit the offices of the Ministry of Health, International Cooperation and Development Fund, and the Central American Trade Office.

According to a statement by the Taiwanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the delegation will also visit National Palace Museum, the iconic Taipei Tower 101 and the world-renowned Kavalan Whiskey Distillery in Yilan.

Beijing sees Taiwan as a rebellious province that has to return to the fold, whereas Taipei asserts itself as a sovereign state totally independent of China.





Central American dictators use Jerusalem to sway U.S. policy






James North. Mondoweiss. October 21, 2019

Here’s the latest debacle for the United States in Central America, the region that has already sent several hundred thousand refugees fleeing northward. On Friday, a New York court found the brother of Honduras’s dictator guilty of drug trafficking. Angry anti-regime demonstrations erupted all over Honduras, but the U.S. showed no sign that it will abandon the dictator, Juan Orlando Hernández. (A poor New York Times article rattled on at unnecessary length about the specifics of the case, but took until paragraph 24 to briefly point out that the Hernández regime is sustained by Washington.)

What’s the Israel connection? First, let’s be clear; the U.S. all by itself has promoted one crisis after another across Central America since back in the 1980s, when the Reagan administration supported and financed right-wing allies in El Salvador, Guatemala and Nicaragua who murdered tens of thousands of their countrymen who were only struggling for a better life.

And back in 2009, before Donald Trump was anywhere near the White House, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tacitly approved a right-wing coup d’etat in Honduras, in which the elected president was kidnapped and flown out of the country.

But Trump has given the Israel/Central America connection a new twist. Right-wing governments there recognized that if they supported Israel, including moving their embassies from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, they could score big points in Washington. First, Guatemala. In 2015, mass protests had forced the government to agree to an independent investigative agency to root out widespread corruption. The International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala (Cicig) was supported by the United Nations, with some U.S. financial help, and it quickly produced results, including imprisoning a former president.

The Guatemalan elite wised up. In May 2018, Guatemala moved its embassy to Jerusalem, and the billionaire pro-Israel gambling magnate Sheldon Adelson even used his private Boeing 767 jetliner to fly the Guatemalan delegation to Israel for the ceremony.

The Trump administration loved this pro-Israel gesture. So when the Guatemalan president abolished the anti-corruption probe (it closed down last month), the U.S. said nothing.

Israel may also be a factor in the shameful U.S. policy toward Honduras. In November 2017, the current president, Hernández, stole the presidential election, and the U.S. dishonestly endorsed the rigged results, even though observers from the Organization of American States had found so many irregularities that they recommended a re-vote. Honduras had learned that a way to Trump’s heart was through Israel, and in December 2017 it cast one of only 9 votes against a United Nations resolution that condemned the U.S. recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

Honduras lately opened a trade office in Jerusalem, and the Israeli prime minister has proclaimed that the country is on its way to opening an embassy there.

(Israeli arms sales have also long been a destabilizing factor in Central America. So it was no surprise when the Honduras regime revealed that it had bought $209 million worth of weapons from Israel, including surveillance drones for the army.)

So. The U.S. continues to stand on the wrong side of history in Central America, promoting policies that are not in our national interest — in part so that a couple of small nations can maintain the idea that the Israeli capital is Jerusalem.





AMLO Orders Inquiry into DEA-Requested Arrest of El Chapo’s Son






Nacha Cattan and Lorena Rios. Bloomberg. October 22, 2019

Mexico’s President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has ordered an investigation into the “errors” and “failures” of an attempt to capture the son of the world’s most notorious drug lord, following a request by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency.

“The failed operation needs to be investigated and analyzed,” Lopez Obrador said at his daily press conference. “On the other hand, the decision to stop the action in order to save human lives was the right one.” The DEA did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.

Lopez Obrador, known as AMLO, has been struggling to contain the fallout from a botched operation to detain Ovidio Guzman Lopez, son of Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman. The son is said to have taken over some of the criminal activities of his father, who is serving out a life sentence in the U.S. The confrontation left eight dead and occurred in Culiacan, Sinaloa, the stronghold of the violent cartel Guzman had led.

While AMLO was aware of the security forces’ difficulty in arresting Guzman Lopez, the president then boarded a commercial flight to Oaxaca. As he was in transit he was unavailable when members of his security cabinet made the decision to release the suspect, Jesus Ramirez, the spokesman of the president, told Bloomberg News. It’s not yet clear at what time AMLO boarded the plane.

Security forces were carrying out a request to present Guzman Lopez before Mexican authorities as part of extradition proceedings sought since December by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, Ramirez said.

Cartel members on Thursday turned Culiacan into a war zone after the authorities surrounded Guzman Lopez at a house where he was taking refuge. Homemade tanks complete with machine guns rumbled through the streets, stopping traffic and firing repeatedly. The city was littered with burning vehicles as residents posted videos on Twitter of gunfire and chaos.





Ecuador Indigenous Protests Braved ‘War Zone’ to Win People’s Victory, But Anti-IMF Fight Not Over






Mohammed Hamarsha and Cloe Perol. NACLA. October 17, 2019

After 12 days of nationwide unrest, several Indigenous peoples of Ecuador joined by social organizations succeeded in forcing the government of Lenin Moreno into scrapping a presidential decree eliminating fuel subsidies in the oil-producing nation.

The uprising saw thousands of indigenous people marching towards the capital Quito from different corners of the country. They occupied the city and received unprecedented solidarity from local volunteers and progressive universities, while protesters vigorously clashed with security forces for days around the presidential palace and National Assembly.

“You can call it a war zone. It is ugly, ugly, ugly,” said Margarita, a member of the rescue brigade of the Eugenio Espejo hospital in the Ecuadorian capital Quito, attempting to catch her breath. She had just returned to a health care post a few hundred meters away from the frontlines of the clashes between security forces and anti-government protesters.

Her comments came minutes after Ecuador’s president Lenín Moreno decreed a total curfew in the capital and the deployment of the armed forces. The government made the announcement just 45 minutes before the curfew went into effect at 3:00 p.m. local time on Saturday, October 12, a day before the government held talks with Indigenous leaders that ultimately concluded with Moreno agreeing to revoke the decree that sparked the protests.

The unrest in Ecuador started on October 3, when the government announced a set of economic measures known in Latin America as the paquetazo, including the presidential decree 883, which ordered the immediate elimination of decades-old fuel subsidies. The economic package fell in line with recommendations by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as part conditions of a $4.2 billion in loan agreement struck with Moreno’s government in 2018.

Transport workers launched a nationwide strike before several Indigenous movements joined them, marching to the capital in support of the strike and in rejection of the reforms.

Only a few hours after protest started, Moreno decreed a state of emergency, which suspended civil rights and allowed for military deployment to police the protests.

Two days later, the transport workers lifted their strike after the government agreed to increase public transport prices. However, the Indigenous movements and smaller social organizations around the country vowed to continue their protests.

Realizing his deal with the transport workers’ representatives failed to stop the demonstrations, Moreno issued an executive order that transferred the seat of the government from the capital Quito to the port city of Guayaquil and established a nighttime curfew around strategic state buildings on October 8.

At least seven people were killed in the protests, according to Ecuador’s Ombudsman office, while hundreds were injured nationwide, and reports put the number of those detained at more than 1,000.

“Love, Support, Solidarity”

Amid smoke from tear gas and fires lit up by the protesters, Margarita told us security forces have allowed her and first responders to attend to wounded protesters and police officers.

“On both sides, they are letting us attend to the wounded. They are still humanitarian in that sense,” she said, adding that protesters have been supporting first responders, giving them safe passage, and “protecting” them. “The same also goes for the police. See, so far I have not run into one who would hit me with pellet bullets.”

First responders’ brigades also worked with nurses, doctors, and students from medicine schools in the city to help injured protesters. The volunteer medics were “giving all the support they can” Margarita said.

The medics set up various posts around the site of the protests and roamed the streets wearing white coats and holding white flags to avoid being targeted by the security forces. We approached multiple volunteers for comments, but they declined to answer as only first responders’ brigades were authorized to speak to the media.

Since they started arriving in Quito on October 7, Indigenous communities have occupied the capital’s cultural center known as La Casa de la Cultura and the park adjacent to it, just 900 meters away from the National Assembly. The biggest Indigenous organization in the country, Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador (Conaie), along with other Indigenous organizations, convened assemblies there to make decisions on their demands and next steps, while also planning their marches towards different government buildings.

Away from home and traveling as families and communities with children and elderly people, the thousands of Indigenous protesters organized food, shelter, and medical supplies in and around the cultural center and the park with the help of volunteers and donations from individuals and groups around the city.

“We are receiving the love, support, solidarity of the people of Quito and different provinces of the country who are arriving with medical supplies, with toilet supplies, with water, drinking water,” said a woman volunteering at a donation post as people formed human chains to carry supplies of food, clothes, and mattresses. “We are here with all our heart, with all our feelings of solidarity.”

She explained that people from all Indigenous communities had set up kitchens in order to provide food “for everyone, both on the battlefront, and in the surroundings.”

Meanwhile, students, professional caregivers, and retirees gathered at universities in the capital to look after children, mothers with babies, and elderly people in need of care.

Most participating in the demonstrations spend the night in the cultural center and shelters in several universities in the city such as Universidad Catolica, Universidad Salesiana, and the country’s largest public university, the Universidad Central.

Others have been welcomed into people’s homes in working class neighborhoods such as La Vicentina, where locals provide “spaces for men and women of all ages to spend the night.” The volunteer believes that such “solidarity keeps the Indigenous people in the fight.”

At another entrance of the cultural center, Alicia, 30, was among other volunteers handing over baking soda-soaked cloths, made of torn up pieces of donated clothes, to protesters, so they could brave the tear gas being fired by police just a few hundred meters away.

“I came here today—I left my son at home with my mother—to stand in solidarity with our Indigenous brothers,” Alicia said, adding that she had come with her dad to drop off some donations and ended up staying to help.

Bread and Violence

In a country that has seen very little unrest on a significant scale for the last 12 years, the deaths of seven people in less than 10 days is anything but normal. Alicia said she and many of the volunteers directly blame the Ecuadorian government for the ongoing violence. “We are Ecuadorian people; we are all united in this,” she said. “And many of us are outraged by so many deaths for so much violence, that it is by the state, by the national police, and the military.”

Nevertheless, she argued that members of the police and military are also people who “have parents that are Indigenous, who come from different communities around the country,” and she hoped they would not turn against their own people despite their uniforms and weapons.

During clashes days earlier, protesters were seen throwing water bottles and bags of bread to the police for sustenance, shouting: “This is how your people treat you. Remember it!”

As protests paralyzed the country, police deployed tear gas, rubber bullets, and water cannons, while sealing off the areas surrounding the presidential palace as demonstrators attempted to reach it. Protesters also briefly occupied the National Assembly on October 8, before security forces removed them.

Most local media outlets were critical of the protests, while the government and its supporters called demonstrators “zanganos,” or lazy, arguing that such mobilizations hinder people’s ability to go to work.

“We are all Ecuadorians. They [the Indigenous people] are our brothers,” Alicia said in response to such arguments. “Thanks to them we have food on our table. They work from dusk to dawn in the field to be able to produce food and bring it to big cities. Without them, big cities are nothing. They are our workforce, not the big companies.”

A People’s Victory

The unrest came to an end Sunday when the government and Indigenous leaders from nations across the country reached an agreement as a result of United Nations-mediated talks. The talks, broadcasted live across the country,  delved into some heated exchanges between the two sides, before negotiators went into an hours-long recess away from the cameras where they forged the deal.

Indigenous leaders agreed to be part of a commission that would come up with a new decree mandating budget cuts in other areas to fulfill IMF obligations imposing austerity measures.In a victory for the popular uprising, President Moreno agreed to revoke his incendiary decree 883 eliminating the fuel subsidies. Indigenous leaders agreed to be part of a commission that would come up with a new decree mandating budget cuts in other areas to fulfill IMF obligations imposing austerity measures.

On Monday morning, the government lifted the state of emergency and the curfew in Quito. In an act of final solidarity and street organization, Indigenous people, along with volunteers and police officers, worked to clean streets and remove roadblocks. Moreno officially revoked the decree later that day.

While many celebrated the Moreno decision as a people’s victory against the IMF, mainstream media and even some progressive outlets outside the country falsely reported that the Ecuadorian government had done away with all austerity measures, with some going as far as saying the deal with the IMF had been dropped altogether.

However, most of the austerity measures in the new economic package, such as reducing vacation time for public sector from 30 days to 15 days, and reducing salaries and labor protections for public and private employees, remain untouched.

The executive now must send those IMF-suggested reforms to the National Assembly for approval. Some also remain on edge recalling that the government had previously said a second economic package would be introduced after the first one was approved.

Some would even argue that the scrapping of the decree was not a real win as the government has made it clear that a new presidential decree concerning the subsides would have to be agreed on as part of the newly created national commission. The United Nations said the new commission was due to meet this week for the first time.

Meanwhile, the country’s Indigenous movements, credited with toppling governments in decades past but notably less powerful and organized in recent years, seems to be refinding its stride and will likely be further empowered by the recent win, even if it was a partial one.





Mohammed Hamarsha is a journalist working for teleSUR English. Cloe Perol is a linguist and freelancer. Both are based in Quito, Ecuador.





President Accused of Fraud in Bolivia Election as He Opens Big Vote Lead






Ernesto Londoño. New York Times. October 21, 2019

LA PAZ, Bolivia — President Evo Morales of Bolivia faced stinging accusations of election irregularities by international observers and violent protests in the streets on Monday as an updated tally of votes cast in the country’s presidential election appeared to give him a big enough lead to avoid a runoff.

With about 95 percent of the votes counted, election officials said Mr. Morales received 46.8 percent of the votes, while his closest rival, Carlos Mesa, won 36.7 percent. To avoid a runoff, the incumbent needed a 10-percentage-point advantage.

Preliminary results released hours after polls closed on Sunday showed a far tighter margin between the two leading candidates, an outcome that appeared to make it certain they would face off in a runoff in December.

Manuel González, the head of the election observer mission dispatched by the Organization of American States to monitor Bolivia’s vote, said on Monday night that he was “profoundly concerned” by the “drastic” reversal in the vote results.

Mr. González, a former foreign minister from Costa Rica, said the vote trend data compiled by the mission’s observers suggested that the two candidates were apart by less than 10 percentage points. He called the tally released on Monday night by election officials “inexplicable” and said it eroded trust in the electoral system.

“It’s essential that the people’s will be fully respected,” Mr. González said.

He said that the O.A.S. intended to issue a comprehensive report on its findings in coming days and that the report would say a second round was warranted.

The damning assessment by the team of observers raised the prospect that a victory by Mr. Morales would be regarded by the international community as illegitimate.

While Mr. Morales’s consolidation of power, and his decision to do away with term limits, have raised alarm at home and abroad, the integrity of Bolivia’s election system has not been seriously called into question since he was first elected in 2005.

The uncertainty over the results opened a new front in the type of violent political unrest that has rocked the region over the past few weeks. Photos and videos of bloodied protesters were posted on social media on Monday night.

Mr. Mesa blamed Mr. Morales for the clashes and acts of vandalism that were spreading late Monday night. Among the most dramatic was a fire that engulfed an election tribunal building in the southern city of Sucre.

“The government, with its decision to again subvert the will of the people, is the only responsible party for the violence that threatens Bolivia,” he wrote in a statement on Twitter.

Many Bolivians were suspicious of the result because election officials halted the updating of vote results for nearly 24 hours. Across the country, people posted videos on social media of scenes that purported to show electoral irregularities, including stashes of ballots and other election materials found in residences and vehicles.

The accusations of fraud created a widespread sense that the president or his allies had worked behind the scenes to rig the vote.

As election officials released new results at a hotel in La Paz giving the president a 10-percentage-point lead, opponents of Mr. Morales angrily changed “fraud, fraud!”

Heavily armed police officers were deployed to the streets, where they clashed with demonstrators on Monday night, according to television news reports.

As acts of vandalism and protests spread across the country, some election teams participating in the vote count said they had suspended their work until order could be restored.

Waldo Albacarrín, a prominent human rights activist and university president, was among those wounded during protests on Monday. With blood streaming from his forehead after he was struck by a tear-gas canister, he said critics of Mr. Morales would remain undaunted.

“These people out here are not going to allow more abuses,” he said in a televised interview.

Mr. Mesa accused the governing party of foul play on Monday as election officials stopped updating the vote count.

“This government is trying to block the path to a second round, which was clearly established yesterday,” Mr. Mesa told reporters.

If there is a runoff, Mr. Mesa would most likely get the backing of rival presidential candidates who participated in the election, so Mr. Morales would face a daunting fight.

Addressing supporters Sunday night, Mr. Morales characterized the result as a major victory and did not concede that there would be a second round.

Gabriela Montaño, Mr. Morales’s health minister, said in a televised interview Monday night that allegations of foul play by the governing party were baseless.

“Nothing could be more false,” she said. She added that the governing party would “wait patiently” for official results. She blamed Mr. Mesa for stoking violence.

Election officials on Monday did not respond to questions about why the vote results had not been updated.

The Organization of American States, which deployed a large team of election observers on Sunday, expressed alarm and called on election officials to explain why they had stopped updating results. Several governments in the region also expressed concern.

Michael Kozak, the top American diplomat overseeing Latin America policy, said Monday night that the United States “rejects the Electoral Tribunal’s attempts to subvert democracy by delaying the vote count and taking actions that undermine the credibility of Bolivia’s elections.”

In a statement on Twitter, he warned that the United States “will work with the international community to hold accountable anyone who undermines Bolivia’s democratic institutions.”

Brazil’s Foreign Ministry also expressed concern over what it called the “lack of response from election officials” about vote counting information.

Mr. Morales, 59, has been in office since 2006, making him the longest-serving head of state in Latin America. His bid for a fourth consecutive term has been criticized at home and abroad as a breach of Bolivia’s democratic rules.

Bolivia’s Constitution, which was passed during Mr. Morales’s first term, says presidents may serve no more than two consecutive terms.

In 2016, Mr. Morales put forward a referendum seeking to do away with that limit and lost by a narrow margin. The following year, however, Bolivia’s Constitutional Court gave Mr. Morales the green light to run again, issuing a contentious ruling that held that term limits infringe on basic human rights.

While Mr. Morales has been recognized for transformational policies that reduced inequality, empowered indigenous people and made Bolivia’s economy an exemplar in the region, many of his fellow citizens now want him gone.

Critics say he has become increasingly authoritarian, accusing him of abusing his influence over the judicial system to intimidate or sideline political rivals. They also contend that the government has wasted money on unnecessary projects, including a new 29-story presidential building, at a time when the economy is showing signs of strain.

Mr. Mesa had earlier noted that election officials had promised to release comprehensive preliminary results promptly after the polls closed.

“The longer it takes to learn the final results, the more chance there will be for manipulation,” he said.