Thursday, February 21, 2019

The War Machine Is Re-Branded As Feminist?









https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FOGowwQToM





















































Cop Arrests 11-Year-Old Over Pledge Of Allegiance









https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkxA7FlhGc8






















































Bernie and the Black Vote










https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=6yFUE6VnRGk






















































Steve Rattner Warns that Government-Granted Patent and Copyright Monopolies Are Imposing a Burden on Our Children




















Written by Dean Baker


Published: 11 February 2019




Of course, he wouldn't do that. Steven Rattner isn't concerned about the hundreds of billions (perhaps more than $1 trillion) that the government redistributes upward each year in the form of patent and copyright rents. These rents, which come to close to $400 billion annually for prescription drugs alone, are a direct and intended result of the monopolies that the government gives companies and individuals as a way of paying for innovation and creative work.

But Steven Rattner isn't concerned about this enormous burden on our children, which makes folks like Bill Gates incredibly rich. Instead, he is worried about the much smaller burden of the interest on the debt, which currently nets out (after deducting money rebated by the Federal Reserve Board) to around $200 billion a year or 1.0 percent of GDP. He also is not concerned about the fact that the income of our children may be $1 trillion a year less, which has the same effect on living standards as paying another $1 trillion a year in higher taxes ($3,000 per person), because of the austerity that people like him demanded in the years following the Great Recession.

For some reason, no matter how much damage these people cause and how little sense their arguments make, we are still supposed to take their views seriously. Any ideas why?

















Biggest Snubs In Oscars History




















The Academy Awards inspire debate every year about whether certain films, directors, and actors were recognized over more deserving ones, and over time, some of those overlooked movies and performances have come to seem particularly egregious. The Onion looks back at the biggest Oscars snubs in history.


Citizen Kane:
While Orson Welles’ magnum opus is considered a masterpiece today, audiences in 1942 just weren’t as into being bored out of their fucking minds.


Raging Bull:
The Academy made up for snubbing this Martin Scorsese movie by also snubbing Goodfellas 10 years later.


Tom Cruise:
His failure to win a Best Actor award despite a long and illustrious film career has been attributed to the Academy’s notorious pro-Xenu bias.


Jaws:
Was considered a shoo-in for Best Shark.


Judy Garland:
Left out of the Best Actress category for The Wizard Of Oz in which the 16-year-old acts, sings, and dances in a starring role, Garland was instead awarded an adorable miniature Oscar statuette called the Juvenile Award, which totally wasn’t patronizing at all.


Avatar:
If we’d just given James Cameron the stupid award back in 2009 maybe we wouldn’t have to go through four more installments of this garbage.


Matthew Lillard:
He’s been in like 30 movies and still not a single Oscar.


Hell Or High Water:
Many felt this gripping modern-day Western was far more deserving than La La Land to be mistakenly announced as the winner before losing to Moonlight.


Alfred Hitchcock:
Never won Best Director despite his work pioneering the film style in which a bunch of fake-looking animals attack humans for no reason.


Taxi Driver, Network, and All The President’s Men:
All three lost Best Picture to an equally deserving Rocky in 1976, when the film industry learned they’re better off releasing a maximum of one good movie per year.


























Žižek: Towards a Materialist Theory of Subjectivity









https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaaYnfxvjpk























































Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Utopian science fictions legitimising our current dystopia, Yanis Varoufakis




https://livestream.com/oxuni/events/8557394/videos/187226981?t=1549916632960


Utopian science fictions legitimising our current dystopia – 2019 Taylor Lecture, Oxford Universityby webmaster YanisVaroufakis


The Faculty of Medieval and Modern Languages, Oxford University, kindly invited me to deliver the 2019 Taylor Lecture on 12th February 2019. I chose the topic of Realistic Utopias versus Dystopic Realities - my aim being to highlight the manner in which really-existing capitalism is marketed as a utopian science fiction that has nothing to do with... really-existing capitalism. Behind this elegant utopian mathematical the powers-that-be hide a dismal dystopia that is failing humanity in a variety of ways. Plato, King Lear, Coriolanus and the Borg Queen make cameo appearances...