Wednesday, August 22, 2018

Australian government near collapse as Liberal Party lurches to the extreme right
















By James Cogan

22 August 2018

The real victor of yesterday’s ballot to decide who holds the leadership of the governing Liberal Party, and therefore sits as prime minister of Australia, is former Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton—the candidate who lost.

Dutton, representing the most right-wing faction of the Liberal Party, won 35 votes from his parliamentary colleagues, just seven short of defeating Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who received 48 votes. Turnbull’s position has been irreparably undermined. At least 10 of his ministers, including Dutton, have tendered him their resignations, in a blatant demonstration of no-confidence.

Dutton, with the gloating support of former Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who Turnbull ousted in a leadership coup in September 2015, is confidently preparing for the next opportunity to seize the leadership. Under some circumstances, such as Turnbull’s resignation, it could take place before the end of the week.

Every political party and the establishment media are aware that the campaign for the next Australian election, which must be called by May 2019 at the latest, has effectively begun. If the Coalition loses its threadbare one-seat majority, the election could be formally called within days.

In a clear indication of the plotting underway for a second challenge, the governor-general, who must formally swear in a new prime minister, has cancelled a trip away from Canberra, stating that it was “prudent” that he should remain in the national capital.

The political lurch to the right by the Liberal Party is indicated by the political record of the nationalist and militarist cabal behind Dutton’s bid for leadership.

Whether under Dutton or a so-called “compromise” candidate, Liberal policies will consist of blaming immigrants for the social crisis afflicting millions of people and inane demagogy against the “inner-city elite” supposedly represented by the opposition Labor and Green parties. It will include the rejection of any measures to reduce carbon emissions and vows that constructing new coal-fired power plants will lead to lower energy prices. On foreign policy, it will consist of blanket commitment to the military alliance with the United States and stepped-up xenophobia against purported Chinese “interference” in Australian politics and society.

The objective of such a campaign would be to try and win back to the Coalition the large number of Liberal and National Party supporters who have switched over the past decade to supporting a variety of right-wing populist “minor” parties, such as Pauline Hanson’s One Nation.

The Liberal Party, along with sections of the rural-based National Party that is also part of the Coalition government, is in the process of being refashioned into a Trump-style movement. One of the ministers who tendered their resignation, Concetta Fierravanti-Wells, denounced Turnbull yesterday, asserting that “our conservative base”—that is, a small but vocal right-wing constituency—“strongly feel that their voice has been eroded.”

It is no mere coincidence that the Dutton-Abbott wing moved to bring down Turnbull just days after a newly-installed Katter Australia member of parliament, Fraser Anning, made a nationalist rant on the floor of the Senate demanding a total ban on Muslim immigration. Anning, summing up the fascistic tendencies coming to the fore, declared that the “final solution” would be a referendum to reinstate Australia’s past racist “White Australia” immigrant policy.

The realignment in Australia is entirely in line with global developments. It is the political reflection of the intractable economic crisis of world capitalism since 2008. In country after country, support for traditional parties of the parliamentary establishment has disintegrated due to their imposition of endless austerity and hardship on the working class for the benefit of a tiny financial and corporate oligarchy.

Internationally, the representatives of the ruling elite are preparing to try and suppress the inevitable eruption of mass struggles by the working class against the failure of the capitalist system. Sweeping anti-democratic laws have been introduced and vast resources poured into increasing the size and powers of police forces and intelligence agencies. Under conditions in which sympathy for left-wing and socialist positions is growing, desperate efforts are being made to censor and silence oppositional views and discussion from the internet.

At the same time, factions of the capitalist class are consciously cultivating extreme right-wing, fascistic tendencies to try to undermine, and use against, the development of an internationalist and socialist movement in the working class.

In broad terms, the Dutton-Abbott cabal in Australia is paralleled by the “alt-right” constituency in the US personified by figures like Steve Bannon; the National Front in France of Marine Le Pen; the United Kingdom Independence Party and anti-EU faction of the British Conservative (Tory) Party around Boris Johnson; the fascistic Alternative for Germany (AfD); and the range of fascistic movements in other so-called parliamentary democracies.

The ability of these extreme right tendencies to gain a hearing has been directly facilitated by the pro-capitalist parties once falsely described as the “left.”

The Labor Party in Australia, the Democratic Party in the US, Labour in Britain, the Socialist Party in France, the Social Democratic Party in Germany: all have been at the forefront of the decades-long assault on the social rights and living standards of the working class, as well as presiding over militarism and the undermining of democratic rights.

The right-wing lurch in the Liberal Party is taking place under conditions in which the Coalition is facing defeat at the upcoming election. After nearly five years in office, presiding over the decline of working-class living standards and the enrichment of the wealthy, it is viewed with widespread hostility. Dutton and Abbott are among the most unpopular politicians in the country. Dutton is reviled by millions due to his ruthless persecution, as home affairs minister, of refugees.

The next government will most likely be formed by Labor in a loose coalition with the Greens and other minor pro-capitalist parties. It will have to respond to steadily worsening global and domestic economic conditions and rising tensions between the US, Australia’s strategic ally, and China, the country’s largest trading partner.

Already, Australia has suffered a fall in its currency and is facing immense pressure to increase in interest rates, which could trigger a meltdown in a highly speculative housing market and crisis in the banking system. An incoming government will also face intense demands by the Reserve Bank and global credit agencies to savagely cut public spending to reduce the budget deficit and mounting state debt.

The Australian ruling class has the measure of the Labor Party. It knows Labor, with the backing of the trade unions, will ruthlessly impose the dictates of finance capital and the major corporations against the working class. The dominant factions of Labor are no less fully committed to upholding the strategic alignment with the US against China, regardless of the economic consequences and the immense danger it is leading toward war.

Like extreme right-wing formations internationally, Dutton and Abbott represent preparations for immense class conflict and political upheaval. As the official parliamentary opposition, they would employ populist demagogy to attempt to channel discontent in reactionary, nationalist directions while behind-the-scenes the ruling class conspires to dispense with the façade of democracy altogether.

The critical and urgent task is the development of an independent political movement of the working class against all the establishment parties. Workers must be united around a socialist and program against the capitalist system and the social inequality and war dangers it produces. The fight for such a movement will be at the centre of the election campaign conducted by the Socialist Equality Party, the Australian section of the International Committee of the Fourth International.






















The United Auto Workers corruption scandal and the case for rank-and-file committees





















Joseph Kishore


22 August 2018


In a sentencing memorandum filed Monday against the former vice president of employee relations at Fiat Chrysler (FCA), Alphons Iacobelli, federal prosecutors directly connect payouts to the United Auto Workers (UAW) to the effort to “obtain benefits, concessions and advantages in the negotiations and administration of collective bargaining agreements.”

The memorandum asserts that FCA funneled far more than previously reported to UAW officials to “corrupt and warp the labor-management relationship.” More than $9 million—twice the earlier figure and six times what Iacobelli has admitted to—was channeled to union executives through the UAW-Chrysler National Training Center (NTC) between 2009 and 2017, according to the filing.

The statement that the corrupt relations directly impacted contract negotiations has the most far-reaching implications. Autoworkers should consider the contracts imposed by the UAW null and void, the product of an illegal conspiracy directed against them. This applies not only to the contracts pushed through at FCA between 2009 and 2017. The same corporatist relations prevail at all of the Big Three auto companies, and they extend back decades.

The filing Monday is the latest in a series of revelations in the expanding corruption scandal. Last week, attorneys for Iacobelli filed documents asserting that the conspiracy to influence contract negotiations preceded Iacobelli’s own involvement. “Mr. Iacobelli joined an already ongoing conspiracy,” it states. “The practices and corruption that are the focus of this case started long before Mr. Iacobelli.”

Describing the operations of the NTC, the legal document asserts that UAW officials involved in the operation “routinely had their own private charities, etc.” It continues: “They had NTC-issued credit cards. They had access to large sums of money… Some representatives of the union and the company did this for many years.”

The claims by both FCA and the UAW that the scandal involves only “a small number of bad actors” (according to FCA) and that “our leadership team had no knowledge of the misconduct” (according to then-UAW President Dennis Williams) are being exposed as lies. Among the revelations over the past week is the fact that now-deceased Fiat Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne personally gifted the late UAW Vice President General Holiefield a watch valued at more than $2,000 and then lied about it to federal investigators.

Then-UAW President Williams was himself implicated in a plea agreement released last month by Nancy Johnson, the former top assistant to UAW Vice President for FCA Norwood Jewell. Johnson asserted that Williams directed top UAW executives to use funds from training centers to pay for luxury items and personal expenses.

These corrupt arrangements are only the filthiest expressions of the overall relationship between the UAW and the auto companies. Money and luxury gifts pass so freely from the company to the union because these two organizations are on the same side. The UAW scandal provides indisputable proof of what autoworkers experience every day: the UAW is itself a pro-company enterprise, not a workers’ organization.

Autoworkers and all sections of the working class must draw the necessary conclusions from this fact. To advance their interests, workers need new organizations of struggle: rank-and-file factory and workplace committees to organize and unify resistance to the corporate and financial elite.

In 1984, the Workers League, predecessor of the Socialist Equality Party, pointed to the significance of the UAW-company joint structures and ventures introduced more than three decades ago. In Corporatism and the Trade Unions, the Workers League defined the doctrine of the UAW as “corporatism,” that is, “a doctrine of the identity of interests of labor and management, which leads to the unlimited collaboration between bureaucrats and the capitalist state to defend the profit system no matter how severe the consequences are for the working class.” The Workers League accurately characterized the “Joint Skill Development Training Fund,” predecessor to the NTC, as a “gigantic slush fund.”

The UAW became “UAW-GM,” “UAW-Ford” and “UAW-Chrysler.” The intended result of these arrangements is seen in the conditions facing auto workers today, imposed by the UAW through the suppression of strikes, the acceptance of plant closures and layoffs, and endless contract give-backs to the companies.

Hundreds of thousands of jobs have been eliminated; full-time jobs have been replaced by low-wage, part-time and temporary positions; the workforce has been divided into multiple tiers; health care and pension benefits have been slashed; cost-of-living raises have been eliminated; and the eight-hour day has been effectively obliterated.

The evolution of the UAW into a corporatist syndicate and cheap-labor contractor is not an isolated process. In the US and all over the world, the trade unions, based on their pro-capitalist and nationalist program, have transformed themselves into agencies of the corporations and the government.

Beginning in the late 1970s and 1980s, the unions in the US responded to the globalization of production, the decline of American capitalism and the right-wing shift in the strategy of the American ruling class by joining with corporate management to lower the wages and increase the exploitation of American workers, in order to increase the competitiveness of US companies on the world market. The unions went from putting pressure on the companies to raise wages to putting pressure on the workers to lower wages. The executives who control these organizations were handsomely rewarded for their services.

In the court filing Monday, prosecutors assert that the money funneled from FCA was intended to “buy labor peace.” This the unions are more than willing to sell.
In his argument before the Supreme Court in the case of Janus vs. AFSCMEearlier this year, the lawyer for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) said that the “agency fee”—that is, the requirement that all workers, including those not in the union, pay the equivalent of union dues—is “the tradeoff for no strikes.”

There could be no clearer declaration of the role of the unions as the industrial police force of the corporations and the government.

Those organizations, operating in and around the Democratic Party, that oppose the formation of new organizations of struggle, rank-and-file factory committees, do so from the standpoint of covering up the nature and role of the unions.
Their aim is to prevent workers from drawing the necessary organizational and political conclusions from their bitter experiences with the unions.

To this end, the websites of the International Socialist Organization (ISO), the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and other fake-left groups have said virtually nothing about the UAW corruption scandal, which has been unfolding for many months.

Socialist Worker, the publication of the ISO, which controls the Chicago Teachers Union, has not published a single article on the UAW scandal. Nor has Jacobin magazine, which is associated with the DSA. Labor Notes, which promotes various supposedly dissident factions of the union apparatus, has published only one article—back in February—which pathetically argues that the UAW can be transformed through a campaign for the direct election of officers and regional directors.

These organizations speak for privileged sections of the upper-middle class. They are terrified that workers are moving into struggle and striving to break free of the stranglehold of the unions. The teachers’ strikes earlier this year emerged as a rebellion against the unions, which initially opposed the strikes and then gained control of the walkouts in order to isolate them and sell them out. United Parcel Service (UPS) workers are currently facing a joint conspiracy of the Teamsters and the company to push through a contract over mass opposition, with union officials denouncing workers’ opposition to poverty-level wages as “subjective” and selfish.

The formation of new organizations is the essential prerequisite for mobilizing and uniting these and other sections of the working class. Rank-and-file factory and workplace committees are the form through which workers can advance their own demands, including the restoration of all contract givebacks, the elimination of tiers, the permanent hiring of all temporary workers, an immediate increase in wages for all workers, and genuine democracy and workers’ control in the work place.

The workers’ independent committees, free from the bureaucratic grip of the nationalist trade unions, will create the conditions for unifying workers all over the world in a common struggle.

The World Socialist Web Site and the Socialist Equality Party will do everything in our power to promote and assist in the establishment of independent workers’ organizations, connecting the growth of the class struggle to a socialist political perspective and program. 

We urge workers interested in establishing such committees to contact us today.























Greece was never bailout out and remains in debtor’s prison – Bild Zeitung interview











Yanis Varoufakis





BILD meets Yanis Varoufakis – the man who was THE symbol of the Greek left-wing government’s resistance against the targets set by the bailout troika for the broke state of Greece. We met the professor of economics – who co-founded left-wing movement DiEM25 – in his summer house in the mountains of the sunny island of Aegina.

BILD: Mr. Varoufakis, Greece went broke ten years ago. Where does Greece stand now, after three rescue programmes, 270 billion euros in loans and two debt cuts?

Varoufakis: “At the same point, in the same black hole, and it keeps sinking deeper into it every day. One reason among others is that the creditors’ cutback demands obstruct investments and consumption.”

BILD: But allegedly, Greece can now stand on its own two feet and can be released from the hands of the troika after August 20th …

Varoufakis: “What has really changed? Greece’s state debts have not become lower, but higher. We just have more time now to pay back even more debts. Despite two debt cuts over several billion euros, the debts have grown: the state is still broke, private citizens have become poorer, companies still go bankrupt, and our gross national product has decreased by 25 percent. The cutback demands limit consumption and investments. Companies owe money to each other and to the state. The state owes enormous sums in refunds to companies. Everybody owes money to everybody – but nobody has money to pay back their debts. Since 2010 young people have been leaving the country, in recent years at the rate of 15000 every month. If this continues, we’ll soon only have old people here who either stayed or came back from abroad when they retired. Plus there are the people who work for them, or in tourism. I call this desertification. The Roman Tacitus used the expression ‘They made a desert and called it peace’. In Greece they call it ‘fixed’.”

BILD: But tourism is booming with more than 37 million visitors …

Varoufakis: “We have a dramatic over-taxation in Greece. Combined with social security contributions, small businesses, even the self-employed, pay 75 percent to the state – beginning with the first euro! This is killing young entrepreneurs, in particular. In Bulgaria, next to us, the business tax is ten percent. The companies are running away from us. And yes, tourism is booming, there has been an incredible push over the past years. However, the infrastructure in Greece does not suffice for this. New investments are required. But there is not enough money for that. Plus, the boom and increase in tourism do not suffice to lift the sunken ship from the bottom of the sea.”

BILD: Your former boss and former buddy, head of government Alexis Tsipras, the troika, the German government, the EU – they all point out the budget surplus of XZ percent. Are they all lying?

Varoufakis: “The surplus is very real, not at all a lie. However, it reflects the flesh and blood that the state extracts from a dying private sector. It is the evidence of the crime against logic, not of recovery or success. They portray the statistics of misery as evidence of success. They change the rules so they can say that the Greece bailout was a success. If it doesn’t fit, get a bigger hammer. That is not only against any logic, it is also a crime against the people in the EU states – from Portugal to Germany.”

BILD: Who has lied?

Varoufakis: “All of them! Greek governments, the IMF, the ECB, everyone. And you Germans have been heavily lied to by Ms. Merkel – twice. The first time was when she stepped into the Bundestag for the first rescue package and said that this would be an act of solidarity with the Greeks, when the money was intended only for German and French banks who had, against logic, loaned a lot of money to the Greek state and oligarchy.”

BILD: Well, the banks – mostly Greek banks – were saved so the Greek state wouldn’t collapse, would still have access to money, and could pay for wages and salaries … But what was the second lie?

Varoufakis: “It was not the Greek banks that were saved. It was Deutsche Bank and the rest of France’s and Germany’s banks. As for the Greek banks and state, they should not have been saved – we should have been allowed to go bankrupt, suffer the consequences but then be allowed to pick ourselves up and move on – something that these bailouts prohibited, forcing Ms. Merkel to her second lie: the promise to the Germans that the bailout loans would be paid back and with interest – something that was impossible given Greece’s bankruptcy. She has been trapped in this lie ever since. Once you start lying about such things, you can no longer escape. And so she continues to lie …”

BILD: Before 2002, Greece lied its way into the euro with faked statistics. Now, after all these years of rescuing the country, it should finally meet the euro criteria, right?

Varoufakis: “Ha! Of course not. First, do you really think that the EU and Berlin were fooled by Greek statistics? They always knew. They were conniving in the statistical manipulation of Italy because the politicians really needed Italy in. Greece entered on the basis of the same intentional manipulation of the ‘rules’. Rules that could not be met then and which are impossible to apply now. Turning a blind eye to this was a concession that Helmut Kohl made to France’s head of state, Mitterand, for his agreeing to the German reunification. Wolfgang Schäuble was present back then – he and the German Bundesbank knew this couldn’t work. He has basically stuck to his position.”

BILD: You and Wolfgang Schäuble were the two big brawlers in the decisive months of 2015 when your country was close to leaving the euro. Schäuble supported an exit with billions in help – so that Greece could either make itself fit for the euro and return at some point, or do its own thing. In hindsight, was he right?

Varoufakis: “At least he wasn’t completely wrong. But what he really meant was: go away, get out of the euro. He wanted us forever out, since this doesn’t work, after all, and because he saw that, with Italy, a far bigger catastrophe is approaching the euro zone. What sense does it make to kick someone out with a huge amount of money, for a short period of time? Then there would be no reason to return to the badly construed euro, which would be expensive for Greece.”

BILD: If you had the choice, which government would you rather enter: that of your former buddy Alexis Tsipras or Schäuble’s?

Varoufakis: “Neither of those. But if you’re asking who I trust more, then my answer is clear: Wolfgang Schäuble.”

BILD: Why?

Varoufakis: “In all this time, he was the only one who told at least part of the truth. I could trust the things he said to me privately – even though that was not always the same as what he said in public to the Germans. He always kept his word to me.”

BILD: And Ms. Merkel?

Varoufakis: “Never! She seems terribly uninspired and devoid of vision to me. She will go down in history as the politician who had almost all of the power and possibilities to unite Europe and to lead it into the future and to implement reforms – but then she failed to make use of a historical opportunity. And I don’t trust her in general.”

BILD: How did Merkel manage to make Alexis Tsipras side with her in 2015 and agree to the third rescue package – against his conviction and the vote of the majority of Greeks?

Varoufakis: “To be honest, I don’t know. But she has also destroyed many others with her very peculiar charm: various leading SPD men, the men in her own party, France’s former president Hollande – and she will also do it with Macron. Tsipras was one of her easiest exercises. She promised him a lot and gave him nothing. For instance, she promised him debt relief – and then obstructed them. She had an aim: we were supposed to get more money and then shut up. Even Schäuble said then that this wouldn’t work.”

BILD: But why don’t you trust her?

Varoufakis: “Very early on, she asked Tsipras – according to his narrative – to kick me out. He refused to. Later, when there were serious struggles between me and Wolfgang Schäuble, Merkel apparently told Tsipras something like: ‘it’s great that you didn’t fire him, we can let Schäuble and Varoufakis fight, and then the two of us will calmly find a solution’. So she didn’t only go behind my back, but also that of her own minister of finance, who fought for the third rescue package in the Bundestag, against his own conviction.”

BILD: Did Schäuble ever tell you what he thought of the third rescue package that was under discussion in 2015?

Varoufakis: “Yes.”

BILD: And?

Varoufakis: “He told me that he was against it, that it wouldn’t work like this. That’s why he supported the idea of us leaving the euro. He thinks the same about Italy. But he believed – and here he was wrong, I think – that he could keep France in the euro, even though it is also in a bad position.”

BILD: You caused a stir, when you rehired hundreds of cleaning ladies for the ministry of finance, despite the bankruptcy. At the same time, there was a lack of financial investigators for checking the dirty money lists that came from abroad – such as the Legarde list …

Varoufakis: “I’m really fed up with having to justify myself for the 300 poor cleaning ladies who received the minimum wage and whose dismissal was cruel and unnecessary. Especially if you see what the troika and Alexis Tsipras’ government did FOR tax evaders immediately after I resigned.”

BILD: What was that?

Varoufakis: “Tsipras fired me exactly at the point of time when we wanted to bring charges against huge numbers of tax evaders. A special group, that I had assembled, had identified 485,000 tax evaders with the help of a particular computer programme and bank data. These people had evaded at least 100,000 euros in taxes each between 2000 and 2014. We had everything ready, we had even linked the banks’ live data with account numbers and tax numbers. Following the German model, we wanted to offer something like an act of grace: whoever pays back their taxes voluntarily and on their own initiative will only pay a minimum fine of 15 percent. We would have caught anyone who then didn’t pay. Among the people we found were many Greek oligarchs and their families.”

BILD: Are you saying that Tsipras fired you because you were going after the rich?

Varoufakis: “No. I was pushed out because I would not sign the 3rd bailout loan. However, the moment I resigned in early July 2015 the troika, with the acquiescence of the Tsipras government, killed the programme that would have caught the tax evaders. As far as it was reported to me, the senior representatives of the troika – not the ministers of finance – wanted to protect the oligarchs. The oligarchs were the troika’s allies in Greece, running the banks and controlling public opinion. They had to be protected.”

BILD: Final question, Mr. Varoufakis: Can you understand the regular German taxpayers’ view that Greece should be grateful for their help and the huge amount of money? You don’t really sound as if you do …

Varoufakis: “I understand that this is how they feel because the facts have been kept from them. I am sure that if your readers knew the truth, they would be very angry with their own government for giving so much money to the German bankers and the Greek oligarchs while pretending they were helping the normal Greek – who only saw pain and misery in the past decade, thus finding it impossible to be grateful. Germans and Greeks must be united in our anger against our governments!”


https://www.bild.de/politik/ausland/bild-international/interview-yanis-varoufakis-greek-crisis-56758080.bild.html


























Less drain on freshwater supplies with seawater fuel discovery











August 21, 2018


University of Nottingham


Researchers have found that seawater can replace freshwater to produce the sustainable fuel Bioethanol, reducing the need to drain precious resources.











Researchers have found that seawater can replace freshwater to produce the sustainable fuel Bioethanol, reducing the need to drain precious resources.

The study -- 'The establishment of a marine focused biorefinery for bioethanol production using seawater and a novel marine yeast strain' -- has been published in Scientific Reports and was carried out by researchers at the University of Nottingham. Their results showed that seawater can be used in Bioethanol production along with a new strain of marine based yeast.

Dr Abdelrahman Zaky, a microbiologist in the School of Biosciences, conducted his research using seawater from the Lincolnshire coast and took his marine yeast samples from various locations in the UK, US and Egypt. He put them through the fermentation process in the laboratories in Bioenergy and Brewing Science Building at the University's Sutton Bonington campus.

Dr Zaky said: "Current fermentation technologies mainly use edible crops and freshwater for the production of bioethanol. With an ever growing population and demand for biofuels and other bio-based produces, there are concerns over the use of the limited freshwater and food crops resources for non-nutritional activities. Also, freshwater has a high price tag in countries where it is available, pushing up the price of production."

Increased awareness of global warming and climate change, combined with petrol price rises, has led to the search for alternative sustainable sources of energy. Bioethanol has been considered one of the best fuel alternatives because it is a liquid fuel with similar characteristics to petrol and governments around the world are looking to increase its production.

High water footprint

Water is a key element in the fermentation process in the production of Bioethanol, a sustainable fuel derived from maize or sugar cane. Currently it has an extremely high-water footprint with an estimated 1,388 to 9,812?litres of freshwater consumed for every litre of bioethanol produced.

Dr Zaky said: "The main purpose of marine fermentation is to introduce an alternative source of water and biomass for industrial biotechnology in order to reduce pressure on use of freshwater and arable land, allowing these resources to be dedicated to production of food and feeds an reducing production costs. Marine fermentation is the approach where seawater, marine biomass and marine microorganisms are used in the fermentation process.

"Seawater is a freely available and plentiful resource, and contains a spectrum of minerals, some of which have to be added to freshwater. The fermentation process using seawater also produces salt and freshwater as bi-products adding to economic benefits of the process."


Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Nottingham. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:
Abdelrahman Saleh Zaky, Darren Greetham, Gregory A. Tucker, Chenyu Du. The establishment of a marine focused biorefinery for bioethanol production using seawater and a novel marine yeast strain. Scientific Reports, 2018; 8 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30660-x
























Talking to an android: Meet ERICA, she wants to listen to you











August 21, 2018


Kyoto University


Researchers have significantly upgraded the interaction system for the conversational android ERICA, by implementing 'backchanneling' and 'attentive listening' ability.











We've all tried talking with devices, and in some cases they talk back. But, it's a far cry from having a conversation with a real person.

Now a research team from Kyoto University, Osaka University, and the Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute, or ATR, have significantly upgraded the interaction system for conversational android ERICA, giving her even greater dialog skills.

ERICA is an android created by Hiroshi Ishiguro of Osaka University and ATR, specifically designed for natural conversation through incorporation of human-like facial expressions and gestures. The research team demonstrated the updates during a symposium at the National Museum of Emerging Science in Tokyo.

"When we talk to one another, it's never a simple back and forward progression of information," states Tatsuya Kawahara of Kyoto University's Graduate School of Informatics, and an expert in speech and audio processing.

"Listening is active. We express agreement by nodding or saying 'uh-huh' to maintain the momentum of conversation. This is called 'backchanneling', and is something we wanted to implement with ERICA."

The team also focused on developing a system for 'attentive listening'. This is when a listener asks elaborating questions, or repeats the last word of the speaker's sentence, allowing for more engaging dialogue.

Deploying a series of distance sensors, facial recognition cameras, and microphone arrays, the team began collecting data on parameters necessary for a fluid dialog between ERICA and a human subject.

"We looked at three qualities when studying backchanneling," continues Kawahara. "These were: timing -- when a response happens; lexical form -- what is being said; and prosody, or how the response happens."

Responses were generated through machine learning using a counseling dialogue corpus, resulting in dramatically improved dialog engagement. Testing in five-minute sessions with a human subject, ERICA demonstrated significantly more dynamic speaking skill, including the use of backchanneling, partial repeats, and statement assessments.

"Making a human-like conversational robot is a major challenge," states Kawahara. "This project reveals how much complexity there is in listening, which we might consider mundane. We are getting closer to a day where a robot can pass a Total Turing Test."


Story Source:

Materials provided by Kyoto University. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.













Probiotic use is a link between brain fogginess, severe bloating












August 6, 2018

Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University

Probiotic use can result in a significant accumulation of bacteria in the small intestine that can result in disorienting brain fogginess as well as rapid, significant belly bloating, investigators report.






Probiotic use can result in a significant accumulation of bacteria in the small intestine that can result in disorienting brain fogginess as well as rapid, significant belly bloating, investigators report.

In a published study of 30 patients, the 22 who reported problems like confusion and difficulty concentrating, in addition to their gas and bloating, were all taking probiotics, some several varieties.

When investigators looked further, they found large colonies of bacteria breeding in the patients' small intestines, and high levels of D-lactic acid being produced by the bacteria lactobacillus' fermentation of sugars in their food, says Dr. Satish S.C. Rao, director of neurogastroenterology/motility and the Digestive Health Clinical Research Center at the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University.

D-lactic acid is known to be temporarily toxic to brain cells, interfering with cognition, thinking and sense of time. They found some patients had two to three times the normal amount of D-lactic acid in their blood. Some said their brain fogginess -- which lasted from a half hour to many hours after eating -- was so severe that they had to quit their jobs.

The report in the journal Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology appears to be the first time the connection has been made between brain fogginess, bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine, high levels of D-lactic acid in the gut and probiotic use, Rao says.

"What we now know is that probiotic bacteria have the unique capacity to break down sugar and produce D-lactic acid. So if you inadvertently colonize your small bowel with probiotic bacteria, then you have set the stage for potentially developing lactic acidosis and brain fogginess," Rao says.

While probiotics can be beneficial in some scenarios, like helping a patient restore his gut bacteria after taking antibiotics, the investigators advised caution against its excessive and indiscriminate use.

"Probiotics should be treated as a drug, not as a food supplement," Rao says, noting that many individuals self-prescribe the live bacteria, which are considered good for digestion and overall health.

Others have implicated probiotics in the production of D-lactic acid -- and brain fogginess -- in patients with a short bowel so their small intestine does not function properly, and in newborns fed formula containing the popular product. Short bowel syndrome results in a lot of undigested carbohydrates that are known to cause small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, or SIBO, and the high levels of D-lactic acid. Severe liver and kidney problems can produce similar problems.

Whether there was also a connection when the gut is intact was an unknown. "This is the first inroad," says Rao.

All patients experiencing brain fogginess took probiotics and SIBO was more common in the brain fogginess group as well, 68 percent compared to 28 percent, respectively. Patients with brain fogginess also had a higher prevalence of D-lactic acidosis, 77 versus 25 percent, respectively.

When brain-foggy patients stopped taking probiotics and took a course of antibiotics, their brain fogginess resolved.

Movement of food through the gastrointestinal tract was slow in one third of the brain foggy patients and one fourth of the other group. Slower passage, as well as things like obesity surgery, can increase the chance of bacterial buildup, or SIBO.

"Now that we can identify the problem, we can treat it," Rao says. Diagnosis includes breath, urine and blood tests to detect lactic acid, and an endoscopy that enables examination of fluid from the small intestines so the specific bacteria can be determined and the best antibiotics selected for treatment.

Normally there is not much D-lactic acid made in the small intestines, but probiotic use appears to change that. SIBO, which was present in most with brain fogginess, can cause bacteria to go into a feeding frenzy that ferments sugars resulting in production of uncomfortable things like hydrogen gas and methane that explain the bloating.

Probiotics added to that feeding frenzy the bacterium lactobacillus, which produces D-lactic acid as it breaks down sugars, The acid get absorbed in the blood and can reach the brain.

All those with brain fogginess, SIBO and/or D-lactic acidosis, were given antibiotics that targeted their bacterial population and asked to discontinue probiotics. Those without SIBO were asked to halt probiotics and stop eating yogurt, which is considered one of the best sources of probiotics. Those with SIBO and D-lactic acidosis but no brain fogginess also took antibiotics.

Following treatment, 70 percent of patients reported significant improvement in their symptoms and 85 percent said their brain fogginess was gone. Those without brain fogginess but with SIBO and high levels of D-lactic acid reported significant improvement in symptoms like bloating and cramping within three months.

Abdominal pain was the most common symptom in both groups and before treatment, six of those with brain fogginess reported a tremendous increase in their abdominal size within just a few minutes of eating.

All patients received extensive examination of their gastrointestinal tract, including a motility test, to rule out other potential causes of their symptoms. They filled out questionnaires about symptoms like abdominal pain, belching and gas and answered questions about related issues like antibiotic and probiotic use as well as food fads and yogurt consumption.

They were given carbohydrates followed by extensive metabolic testing looking at the impact on things like blood glucose and insulin levels. Levels of D-lactic acid and L-lactate acid, which results from our muscles' use of glucose as energy and can cause muscle cramps, also were measured.

Probiotic use may be particularly problematic for patients who have known problems with motility, as well as those taking opioids and proton pump inhibitors, which reduce stomach acid secretion and so the natural destruction of excessive bacteria.

Probiotics are supposed to work in the colon and not the small intestines or stomach, Rao says, so motility issues can result in problems with probiotic bacteria reaching the proper place. A wide variety of problems, from conditions like diabetes to drugs like antidepressants and minerals like iron, can slow movement and increase the possibility that probiotics will remain too long in the upper gut where they can cause harm, he says.

Probiotics definitely can help, for example, people who have gastroenteritis, or stomach flu, or are left with diarrhea and other problems after antibiotics wipe out their natural gut bacteria, Rao says.

"In those situations, we want to build up their bacterial flora so probiotics are ideal," he says.

Rao's pursuit of a possible connection between probiotics, brain fogginess and bloating started with a memorable patient who developed significant amounts of both problems within a minute of eating.

"It happened right in front of our eyes," Rao says of the dramatic abdominal distention. They knew the woman had diabetes, which can slow motility. When they looked in the blood and urine at a variety of metabolic compounds, they found the high levels of D-lactic acid and soon learned the patient used probiotics and regularly ate yogurt.

Next steps include additional studies in which the investigators better quantify and characterize the brain fogginess reported by patients and following patients for longer periods to ensure their problems remain resolved. Some patients in the current study required a couple of rounds of antibiotics, Rao notes.

Good food sources of probiotics include yogurt, sauerkraut, kimchi, kefir and dark chocolate, which are generally safe because of the small amounts of bacteria present, Rao says.

The 19-foot long small intestine has been a bit of an understudied organ, likely in part because it's hard to visualize via the mouth or anus, Rao says. "I think the small bowel can be a source of huge mystery," Rao says.

Your helpful gut bacteria, or microbiome, which are essential to things like a well-functioning immune system and general health, are largely in the large intestine and colon.


Story Source:

Materials provided by Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:
Satish S. C. Rao, Abdul Rehman, Siegfried Yu, Nicole Martinez de Andino. Brain fogginess, gas and bloating: a link between SIBO, probiotics and metabolic acidosis. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology, 2018; 9 (6) DOI: 10.1038/s41424-018-0030-7


















Largest brain study of 62,454 scans identifies drivers of brain aging

















Schizophrenia, cannabis use, and alcohol abuse are just several disorders that are related to accelerated brain aging


August 21, 2018


IOS Press


In the largest known brain imaging study, scientists evaluated 62,454 brain SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography) scans of more than 30,000 individuals from 9 months old to 105 years of age to investigate factors that accelerate brain aging.










In the largest known brain imaging study, scientists from Amen Clinics (Costa Mesa, CA), Google, John's Hopkins University, University of California, Los Angeles and the University of California, San Francisco evaluated 62,454 brain SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography) scans of more than 30,000 individuals from 9 months old to 105 years of age to investigate factors that accelerate brain aging. SPECT tomography) evaluates regional cerebral blood flow in the brain that is reduced in various disorders.

Lead author, psychiatrist Daniel G. Amen, MD, founder of Amen Clinics, commented, "Based on one of the largest brain imaging studies ever done, we can now track common disorders and behaviors that prematurely age the brain. Better treatment of these disorders can slow or even halt the process of brain aging. The cannabis abuse finding was especially important, as our culture is starting to see marijuana as an innocuous substance. This study should give us pause about it."

The current study used brain SPECT imaging to determine aging trajectories in the brain and which common brain disorders predict abnormally accelerated aging. It examined these functional neuroimaging scans from a large multi-site psychiatric clinic from patients who had many different psychiatric disorders, including bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Researchers studied 128 brain regions to predict the chronological age of the patient. Older age predicted from the scan compared to the actual chronological age was interpreted as accelerated aging. The study found that a number of brain disorders and behaviors predicted accelerated aging, especially schizophrenia, which showed an average of 4 years of premature aging, cannabis abuse (2.8 years of accelerated aging), bipolar disorder (1.6 years accelerated aging), ADHD (1.4 years accelerated aging) and alcohol abuse (0.6 years accelerated aging). Interestingly, the researchers did not observe accelerated aging in depression and aging, which they hypothesize may be due to different types of brain patterns for these disorders.

Commenting on the study, George Perry, PhD, Chief Scientist at the Brain Health Consortium from the University of Texas at San Antonio, said, "This is one of the first population-based imaging studies, and these large studies are essential to answer how to maintain brain structure and function during aging. The effect of modifiable and non-modifiable factors of brain aging will further guide advice to maintain cognitive function."

Co-investigator Sachit Egan, Google Inc. (Mountain View, CA), said, "This paper represents an important step forward in our understanding of how the brain operates throughout the lifespan. The results indicate that we can predict an individual's age based on patterns of cerebral blood flow. Additionally, groundwork has been laid to further explore how common psychiatric disorders can influence healthy patterns of cerebral blood flow."


Story Source:

Materials provided by IOS Press. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:
Daniel G. Amen, Sachit Egan, Somayeh Meysami, Cyrus A. Raji, Noble George. Patterns of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow as a Function of Age Throughout the Lifespan. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 2018; 1 DOI: 10.3233/JAD-180598