Wednesday, August 1, 2018

After Trump’s Tax Bill, CEOs Rake In Millions in ‘Eye-Popping’ Stock Payouts, Politico Reports













During his 2016 campaign, Donald Trump bragged that if he became president, “everybody is getting a tax cut, especially the middle class,” referring to his proposed 35 percent tax cut. President Trump’s actual tax bill, however, was vastly different from what candidate Trump mentioned in his campaign speeches. Seven months after the GOP tax bill went into effect, a Politico analysis of Securities and Exchange Commission data reveals that instead of enriching middle-class Americans, “Some of the biggest winners from President Donald Trump’s new tax law are corporate executives.”

These executives, Politico explains, “reaped gains as their companies buy back a record amount of stock, a practice that rewards shareholders by boosting the value of existing shares.” In addition to their salaries, many corporate CEOs and other high-ranking executives receive compensation in stock. Since the tax bill, which cut corporate tax rates to 21 percent, was passed on Dec. 22, 2017, these executives, according to Politico, “have been profiting handsomely by selling shares.”

Politico reports that “Wall Street analysts expect buyback activity to accelerate in the coming weeks.”

“It is going to be a parade of eye-popping numbers,” Pat McGurn, the head of strategic research and analysis at Institutional Shareholder Services, a shareholder advisory firm, told Politico.

All this is in sharp contrast to Trump’s promises of a tax cut that would benefit the middle class. What’s more, reports of already wealthy executives getting even richer off stock sales following the tax cut could, Politico observes, “undercut the political messaging value of the tax cuts in the Republican campaign to maintain control of Congress in the midterm elections.”

Democratic congressional candidates could easily create campaign ads highlighting how Oracle Corp. CEO Safra Catz sold $250 million worth of Oracle shares, the most shares sold by any executive. Or they could mention Mastercard’s Ajay Banga, who sold $44.4 million worth of stock one day in May, which, according to Politico, is “the largest single cash-out by an executive of the company in at least 10 years, months after the company announced a $4 billion buyback of its own stock.”

Politico found similar stock sales by executives from cigarette maker Altria, Eastman Chemical, biopharmaceutical company AbbVie, and TJX Companies (the parent company of TJ Maxx).

This practice of insider sales, Politico says, “feed[s] the narrative that corporate tax cuts enrich executives in the short term while yielding less clear long-term benefits for workers and the broader economy.”

Politico found that following the passage of the tax cuts:

Roughly 28 percent of companies in the S&P 500 mentioned plans to return some of their tax savings to shareholders, according to Morgan Stanley. Public companies announced more than $600 billion in buybacks in the first half of this year—already toppling the previous annual record.
Critics are also concerned about the connection between buybacks and insider sales. SEC Commissioner Robert Jackson, a Democrat, said that the link is clear. Politico reports: “He [Jackson] studied 385 buybacks since the beginning of 2017 and found that after half of them, at least one executive sold shares within the next month.”

Companies told Politico that critics were falsely looking for connections where there were none, defended the legality of the buybacks, or declined to comment.

Voters may not care about the intricacies of securities law, buybacks or insider sales. They might, however, care that the CEOs of major corporations are getting wealthier—as their own paychecks decline.




























Bernie Sanders Thanks Koch Brothers for 'Accidentally Making the Case for Medicare for All'












"I suspect that that is not what the Koch brothers intended to do, but that is what's in the study of the Mercatus Center."









After a study by the Koch Brothers-funded Mercatus Center that was clearly designedas a deceptive attack on Medicare for All inadvertently bolstered the economic case for single-payer—which is rapidly growing in popularity among the public and U.S. lawmakers—Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Monday released a video thanking Charles and David Koch for backing an analysis showing that his plan for universal coverage would save $2 trillion over ten years.

"Let me thank the Koch brothers, of all people, for sponsoring a study that shows that Medicare for All would save the American people $2 trillion dollars," Sanders said. "I suspect that that is not what the Koch brothers intended to do, but that is what's in the study of the Mercatus Center."

"At a time when the United States spends far more per capita on healthcare than any other country on Earth, almost 18 percent of our GDP, a Medicare for All healthcare system would save the average family significant sums of money," the Vermont senator added.

Watch:

Speaking to The Intercept on Monday, health policy experts and co-founders of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP) David Himmelstein and Steffie Woolhandler argued that even the "whopping" $2 trillion in savings projected by the Koch-backed study vastly overstates the costs of implementing Medicare for All and "grossly" understates the savings that would result.

"The Mercatus Center's estimate of the cost of implementing Sen. Bernie Sanders' Medicare for All Act projects outlandish increases in the utilization of medical care, ignores vast savings under single-payer reform, and fails to even mention the extensive and well-documented evidence on single-payer systems in other nations—which all spend far less per person on health care than we do," Himmelstein and Woolhandler said. 

According to an analysis by David Himmelstein and Steffie Woolhandler viewed by The Intercept's Ryan Grim and Zaid Jilani, the Mercatus Center's "report undercounts administrative savings by more than $8.3 trillion over 10 years. Taking those savings into account would lower Blahous's estimate from $32.6 trillion to $24.3 trillion."

























Socialism on the Rise as Americans Seek Out Bold, Humane Alternatives to the Brutality of Trump and Capitalism









"Socialism is no longer a dirty word in the U.S."







The thousands of democratic socialists in the United States who have been organizing and fighting for justice in political obscurity for years likely never thought their ideas would be the subject of heated debates on prominent talk-shows like "The View" or feature pieces in such establishment mainstays as PBS and NPR.

But—driven in large part by the persistent popularity of Bernie Sanders' brand of politics and the recent landslide victory of self-described democratic socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in New York's congressional primary—the past several weeks have seen a torrent of news headlines, television segments, and hot takes on democratic socialism's rapid emergence into everyday political discourse, an indication that ideas previously defined as "fringe" by corporate media outlets, pundits, and politicians are quickly going mainstream.

"Democratic Socialism Surging in the Age of Trump," reads a representative headline from the Associated Press. "Is socialism having its moment in U.S. elections?" asked the title of a recent PBS "NewsHour" segment.

Even the New York Post, a right-wing tabloid, grudgingly admitted, "Like it or not, America is now seriously debating socialism."

Here are a few other headlines that have appeared in major publications over the past few weeks:


"Socialism is no longer a dirty word in the U.S," noted the Guardian's Arwa Mahdawi in a recent column highlighting the massive surge of interest in socialism over the past several months, which has translated into a record-breaking membership spike for the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).

Previously hovering below ten thousand members, DSA's membership exploded past 20,000 in the months following Donald Trump's victory in the 2016 presidential elections. Now, just over a month after Ocasio-Cortez trounced corporate Democrat Rep. Joe Crowley, DSA boasts more than 47,000 dues-paying members.

It should perhaps come as no surprise that Americans—and millennials in particular—are seeking a bold and humane alternative to capitalism, a system that has produced staggering and ever-growing levels of inequality, rampant poverty, an existential environmental crisis, and, of course, soaring wealth for the few at the very top.

As New York City DSA member Neal Meyer explained in a recent piece for Jacobin, democratic socialists want to build an alternative future where—in contrast to the current economic landscape defined by financial insecurity for most—"everyone has a right to food, healthcare, a good home, an enriching education, and a union job that pays well."

"We want to guarantee all of this while stopping climate change and building an economy that's ecologically sustainable," Meyer added. "We want to build a world without war, where people in other countries are free from the fear of U.S. military intervention and economic exploitation. And we want to end mass incarceration and police brutality, gender violence, intolerance towards queer people, job and housing discrimination, deportations, and all other forms of oppression."

If the victory of Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.) status as far-and-away the most popular politician in the U.S. are any evidence, such an ambitious vision has widespread appeal. As The Nation's John Nichols noted in a piece pointing to socialism's "winning streak," democratic socialists have also won primary victories in Pennsylvania and Philadelphia, providing further evidence that Americans aren't scared of the S-word.

"A political revolution is coming, and establishment politicians can get on board or be swept away," Tascha Van Auken, co-chair of DSA's national election committee, told Nichols.

The fact that so much of the American public finds the ideas pushed by democratic socialists like Sanders has sent the right's chief propaganda machine, Fox News, into "panic mode" as they struggle mightily to explain why free healthcare and education are actually bad.

Most often, the result has been free advertising for progressive policies:

Right-wing fury and fear-mongering seems to have done little to stem the rising socialist tide.

As New York Magazine's Eric Levitz noted over the weekend, "one month after voters in the South Bronx put 'democratic socialism' in the headlines, real America has registered its outrage at the Democrats' hard-left turn—by giving the party a larger lead in the generic congressional ballot."

From a column last week, The Ringer's Justin Charity adds that "socialists have proved more excited, coordinated, and immediately productive than any other Democratic coalition of the past decade."

"In the short term—which is to say, the midterms—the great excitement about left-wing politics will likely prove indispensable to the Democratic Party's efforts to recapture the House, if not also the Senate, and to mount a more resilient bulwark against Trumpism in Congress," Charity concludes. "In the long term, socialism may recalibrate the Democratic Party and the U.S. political equilibrium altogether. "














Ahed Tamimi's Bravery Exposes Israeli, US Cowardice









https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLhvPB4lyc4dSdoGRgPtkTcKFwvLgC9NKC&time_continue=3&v=iBBGfiKyE2M
























































Tuesday, July 31, 2018

Obama Joins Club of the Super-Rich - Defends Global Capitalism in Lecture









https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=jH1mOgjUqxk




























































Monday, July 30, 2018

London Interview with Slavoj








https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ka8S0vN73u4




















































Sunday, July 29, 2018

Exposing American Fascists








https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KhAsRJhxeI&list=PL8_lN8JGpWGwciPQ8L7AvZRqUw13xpe7X