Argentine Soccer Team Cancels Match With Israel Over Gaza Killings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl2aPilDqzU

Protesters in India Are Massacred as Environmentally Destructive Corporations Have Impunity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpFlZlqFdaQ

Harvard Gives Hillary Medal For Absolutely Nothing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiUC5nAlMic

"Facebook in particular is the most appalling spying machine that has ever been invented." -- Julian Assange.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poaiEFl1J-Y

One progressive movement, one party: a New Left International.

Trump is a threat to global stability—only a new Left international can beat him.


This is what has to be done today: the only way to really defeat Trump and to redeem what is worth saving in liberal democracy is to perform a sectarian split from liberal democracy’s main corpse. 

(What follows is an excerpt from:

“We Must Rise from the Ashes of Liberal Democracy,” by Slavoj Žižek)

The only way to defeat Trump— and to redeem what is worth saving in liberal democracy—is to detach ourselves from liberal democracy’s corpse and establish a new Left.

Elements of the program for this new Left are easy to imagine.

Trump promises the cancellation of the big free trade agreements supported by Clinton, and the left alternative to both should be a project of new and different international agreements.

Such agreements would establish public control of the banks, ecological standards, workers rights, universal healthcare, protections of sexual and ethnic minorities, etc.

The big lesson of global capitalism is that nation states alone cannot do the job—only a new political international has a chance of bridling global capital.

http://inthesetimes.com/article/19918/slavoj-zizek-from-the-ashes-of-liberal-democracy

Cornel West: Bernie Sanders is wrong; Democratic party cannot be reformed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iyyrs5q333I

USA needs a new progressive party

Despite Medicare for All Support 'Spreading Like Wildfire,' Pelosi Shrugs, Says Dems Will 'Evaluate'... If They Win

One critic offered this translation: "My pharmaceutical and health insurance donors hate the idea of Medicare for All, but just vote me back in and, honest, we'll 'look' at it."

by Julia Conley, staff writer

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2018/06/07/despite-medicare-all-support-spreading-wildfire-pelosi-shrugs-says-dems-will

Despite mounting evidence that support for Medicare for All is "spreading like wildfire" and has become a winning issue for Democratic candidates, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi is drawing ire from progressives following a press conference on Thursday where she told reporters that she is open only to "evaluating" the idea if the party wins control of Congress in the mid-terms.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Pelosi has taken more than $200,000 in donations from the health sector in the 2017-2018 election cycle.

Far from being a fringe issue, Medicare for All now has the support of 51 percent of Americans polled by the Washington Post and Kaiser Family Foundation.

Several Democratic candidates running for congressional seats throughout the country—in both blue and red districts—have won elections in recent months on platforms that proudly support Medicare for All.

Deb Haaland is considered likely to win a congressional seat in New Mexico's 1st district after winning the Democratic primary on Tuesday with a platform that called for Medicare for All. In Texas and Illinois last month, universal healthcare proponents Gina Ortiz-Jones and Sean Casten also won their Democratic primaries for House seats. 

And after sharing with voters the story of her mother's inability to afford prescriptions while suffering from cancer, and winning the endorsements of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), Medicare for All advocate Kara Eastman beat Brad Ashford for the Democratic nomination in Nebraska's 2nd district—even as the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) threw its support behind Ashford.

Several Democratic lawmakers who are considered potential 2020 presidential candidates have also announced their support for Medicare for All, with Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) joining Sanders in co-sponsoring his Medicare for All bill.

"I've always been for a public option so I'm always eager to talk about that," Pelosi said at a press conference. "Some of the other issues that have been proposed have to be evaluated in terms of the access that they give, the affordability of it and how we would pay for it, but again it's all on the table."

Pelosi's statement echoed her support for reinstating  rules, aimed at avoiding legislation that adds to budget deficits, which progressives say undermines ambitious, innovative new policies. 

Pelosi's statement coincides with her support this week for reinstating pay-as-you-go rules—a move progressives warn is a direct attack on the kind of bold and inspiring policies that voters are demanding.

Contrary to Pelosi's suggestion that Medicare for All would be prohibitively expensive, Sanders estimates that his plan would cost Americans $6 trillion less than the current for-profit insurance system over the next decade.