When you accept where the
left is going wrong, you see why the right is gaining votes
Slavoj Žižek
Nothing unexpected happened in
the Slovene elections: although the anti-immigrant nationalist-populist Slovene
Democratic Party (SDS) of Janez Jansa emerged as the strongest single party,
the ruling centre-left coalition got many more votes. After a protracted
bargaining, this coalition will probably continue to rule and, through its lack
of vision, corruption scandals, and so on, make it sure that SDS will remain a
convenient “fascist” threat, a scare ready to be evoked every four years in
order to blackmail the majority of voters to elect the same “anti-fascist”
pseudo-left.
So let’s first take a look at
the ideology of SDS. Two years ago, a text appeared in Demokracija(25
August 2016), the SDS weekly, written by Bernard Brscic, one of its main
ideologists. He wrote: “George Soros is one of the most depraved and dangerous
people of our time,” responsible for “the invasion of the negroid and Semitic
hordes and thereby for the twilight of the EU… as a typical talmudo-Zionist, he
is a deadly enemy of the Western civilisation, nation state and white, European
man.”
His goal, Brscic went on, is
to build a “rainbow coalition composed of social marginals like faggots, feminists,
Muslims and work-hating cultural Marxists” which would then perform “a
deconstruction of the nation-state, and transform EU into a multicultural
dystopia of the United States of Europe.” Furthermore, he wrote, Soros is
inconsistent in his promotion of multiculturalism: “He promotes it exclusively
in Europe and the US, while in the case of Israel, he, in a way which is for me
totally justified, agrees with its monoculturalism, latent racism and building
a wall. In contrast to EU and US, he also does not demand from Israel to open
its borders and accept ‘refugees’. A hypocrisy proper to Talmudo-Zionism.”
SDS also sympathises with
Donald Trump – not least because his wife Melania is of Slovene origins – so it
is crucial to look at how Slovenia fits into the ongoing tensions between EU
and the US.
After Trump fired the opening
shot in the trade war with three of its biggest trading partners by deciding to
begin levying tariffs on imports of steel and aluminium from the EU, Canada and
Mexico, the question is: will he get his comeuppance? Neither Russia nor China
can do this – they are caught in the same game as Trump, they basically all
speak the same language of “America (Russia, China…) first.” Only Europe can
deliver it, and the new situation offers Europe a unique chance to assert
itself as a sovereign power block and to act as if the pact with Iran is still
valid. But in this new world of rising popularism, does Europe have enough
strength and unity to do it?
Will the new Eastern European
post-communist “axis of evil” (stretching from the Baltic States to Slovenia
and Croatia) follow the EU resistance to the US, or will it bow to the US and
thus provide yet another proof that the quick expansion of the EU to the east
was a mistake?
The populist revolt across
Europe has been triggered by the fact that people trust less and less the
Brussels technocracy, experiencing it as a centre of power with no democratic
legitimisation. The result of the Italian elections last week marked the first
time in a developed western European country that Eurosceptic populists came
properly to power.
There is little doubt that
issues of the largely ignored working class are driving both Euroscepticism and
support of Trump in the US, with global ramifications. Consider the current
uproar in the US over the abrupt cancellation of ABC’s hit TV show Roseanne because
of a racist tweet by the show’s star Roseanne Barr. In a column titled “With Roseanne Barr gone, will
the US working-class be erased from TV?”, Joan Williams argues that the left
should finally start to listen to the white working class. The cancellation
“deprived American television of one of the only sympathetic depictions of
white working-class life in the past half century – in other words, since
television began,” she writes.
Williams unambiguously
supports the exclusion of Barr on account of her racist tweets – but she adds:
“Virtually all Americans born in the 1940s earned more than their parents;
today, it’s less than half. The rust belt revolt that brought both Brexit and
Trump reflects rotting factories, dying towns, and a half century of empty
promises. Those left behind are very, very angry; Trump is their middle finger.
The more he outrages coastal elites, the more his followers gloat they got our
goat. Finally, they are being noticed.”
And it is crucial to read
Trump’s tariff war with the closest allies of the US against this background:
in his populist version of class warfare, Trump’s goal is (also) to protect the
American working class (and are metal workers not one of the emblematic figures
of the traditional working class?) from “unfair” European competition, thereby
saving American jobs. This is why all the protests of public officials and
economists in EU, Canada and Mexico, as well as the countermeasures proposed by
them, miss the target: they follow the WTO logic of free international trade,
while only a new left addressing the concerns of all those left behind can
really counter Trump.
At some deep and often
obfuscated level, US neocons perceive the EU as enemy number one. This
perception explodes in its underground obscene double, the extreme right
Christian fundamentalist political vision with its obsessive fear of the New
World Order (Obama is in secret collusion with the United Nations;
international forces will intervene in the US and put in concentration camps
all true American patriots – a couple of years ago, there were rumours that
Latin American troops were already in the Midwest plains, building
concentration camps).
Hardline Christian
fundamentalists like Tim LaHaye and his ilk subscribe to this kind of thinking
wholesale. The title of one of LaHaye’s books is The Europa Conspiracy,
and it argues that the true enemies of the US are not Islamist terrorists –
they are merely puppets secretly manipulated by the European secularists, the
true forces of the anti-Christ who want to weaken the US and establish the New
World Order under the domination of the United Nations. In one very strange
way, LaHaye is right: Europe is not just another geopolitical power block, but
a global vision which is ultimately incompatible with strong nation-states.
And this brings us back to
Slovenia where nothing special happened, where the same battle rages as all
around Europe: SDS also portrays itself as the defender of ordinary working
people against the corrupted, non-patriotic elite. The problem of Europe is to
remain faithful to its emancipatory legacy threatened by the conservative,
populist onslaught – and only a renewed left can do it.
In Slovenia, a new party
called simply Levica (Left) also entered parliament this time around with
almost 10 per cent of the votes. This party is for the time being the only
glimmer of hope: it is the only actor on the political stage which escapes the
vicious cycle of the anti-immigrant right and the pseudo-left, these two hands
which, as in Escher’s famous image, permanently draw each other as a scarecrow
to justify their own existence.
