Friday, April 15, 2016

Slavoj Žižek – Masterclass 2: Surplus-Value, Surplus-Enjoyment, Surplus-Knowledge












http://backdoorbroadcasting.net/2016/04/slavoj-zizek-masterclass-2-surplus-value-surplus-enjoyment-surplus-knowledge/



Event Date: 19 April 2016

Room B01
 

Clore Management Building
 

Birkbeck, University of London
 

Torrington Square
 

London WC1E 7HX
Masterclass 2: Is Surplus-Value Marx’s Name For Surplus-Enjoyment?
Slavoj Žižek (International Director, Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities) - Is Surplus-Value Marx’s Name For Surplus-Enjoyment?

Jacques Lacan located the origin of his key notion of plus-de-jouir (surplus-enjoyment) in Marx’s notion of surplus-value, and it is worth exploring in detail the homology of the two notions, adding a third one, that of surplus-knowledge, a pseudo-knowledge in the guise of which our ignorance appears (“supreme” knowledge of God and other hidden forces, conspiracy theories, etc.). Such an analysis is crucial for resuscitating Marx’s critique of political economy, as well as for properly understanding today’s global capitalism and its ideological effects, up to fundamentalist violence.









Sanders' Political Revolution Draws Nearly 30,000 to New York City Rally









Presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders drew a raucous crowd of 27,000 to a Manhattan rally ahead of the critical New York primary


http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/04/14/sanders-political-revolution-draws-nearly-30000-new-york-city-rally




"There are a lot of people here tonight!" observed New York native Bernie Sanders as he began speaking to a raucous, cheering crowd of 27,000 in New York City's Washington Square park on Wednesday night, at the largest rally of the presidential hopeful's campaign thus far.

Members of the crowd climbed trees and crowded at the windows of surrounding buildings to catch a glimpse of the Vermont senator, and occasionally punctuated the candidate's speech with chants of "Bernie! Bernie! Bernie!"

The crowd wore face paint, touted placards declaring "Brooklyn is Berning" and "Democracy v Oligarchy, Humanity v Greed," and some even arrived sporting Bernie Sanders costumes and puppets.

And while many attendees were young, Sanders also drew an older generation of progressives who remembered attending rallies in Washington Square to protest the Vietnam War in their youth.

One such member of the crowd was Robert Carpenter, a retired accountant and veteran from Queens, who told the New York Times, "Bernie is me. I am Bernie."

"I'm one year older than him," Carpenter told the newspaper. "We've been fighting for the same causes our entire lives."

Carpenter also told the Times that he could never vote for Sanders' opponent: "I will never, ever forgive [Hillary Clinton] for her voting for the Iraq War. To say it was a mistake? After all those people were killed and maimed? I do not accept that."

Before Sanders' speech, the popular NYC-based band Vampire Weekend warmed up the crowd, and speeches from famous New Yorkers Rosario Dawson, Tim Robbins, and Spike Lee followed to praise the so-called outsider candidate to the overwhelming crowd of supporters.

Sanders himself even seemed surprised by the size of the rally, and smiled broadly when he arrived on the stage to deliver a speech that focused on a few of the touchstones of his campaign: corporate greed, campaign finance reform, climate change, and income inequality.

Speaking in the state for which Clinton served two terms as senator, and in the same city Wall Street financiers call home, the outspoken democratic socialist candidate also expressed optimism for his chances of winning the state's upcoming primary.

"When I look at an unbelievable crowd like this," Sanders said, "I believe we're going to win in New York next Tuesday."

His chances at winning, he argued, were good, particularly if the tens of thousands who came out on a cold Wednesday night to hear him speak presaged a large voter turnout for the state's April 19 primary.

Sanders also returned to his campaign's message about political revolution, urging the crowd to continue to fight to overturn the status quo.

"What this campaign is profoundly about," Sanders said, "is that change is never from the top on down. It is always from the bottom on up."

The senator continued:
What this campaign is about is the understanding that when we stand together—black, and white, and Latino, and Asian American, and Native American. When we do not allow the Donald Trumps of the world to divide us up, there is nothing we cannot accomplish. What this campaign understands is that real change is when 100 years ago, workers who were exploited, who worked 7 days a week, 12 hours a day, stood together and said 'we will be treated with dignity and respect,' and formed a trade union.

Sanders also reiterated his support for the Communications Workers of America (CWA), the union of Verizon employees who went on strike on Wednesday for a fair contract. CWA signs from the strike could be seen waving from the crowd; it appeared that many striking workers attended the rally after picketing all day.

"Tonight I want to take my hat off to the CWA. Thank you," Sanders said.

He told his supporters, "They are standing up to a greedy corporation that wants to cut their healthcare benefits, send decent paying jobs abroad, and then provide $20 million a year to their CEO."

The progressive crowd booed.

"And Verizon is just a poster child for what so many corporations are doing today," Sanders continued. "This campaign is sending a message to corporate America: You cannot have it all."

The crowd erupted into cheers.










Thursday, April 14, 2016

Libya: Obama Admits Clinton's "Greatest Moment" Was His "Worst Mistake"












The president's 'classified' double standard coupled with Libya discord underscores rocky support for former secretary of state





http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/04/12/libya-obama-admits-clintons-greatest-moment-was-his-worst-mistake



Amid growing speculation about the extent to which President Barack Obama is using his power to bolster the candidacy of Hillary Clinton, recent comments made by the commander in chief about the "shit show" in Libya, among other things, underscore how difficult that line is to toe.

During a telling interview with Fox News this weekend, Obama admitted that "failing to plan for the day after" the 2011 U.S.-backed toppling of Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi was "worst mistake" of his presidency.

The admission followed similar comments made by the president in a lengthy interview with the Atlantic published this month during which he called Libya "a mess" and privately described the failed state as a "shit show."

Given that the overthrow of Gaddafi is "one of the policies cited by Clinton as one of her chief accomplishments," as Vanity Fair's Tina Nguyen notes, Obama's statements could be problematic for the former secretary of state.

During a television interview in 2011, Clinton infamously joked about the fall of Gaddafi saying, "We came, we saw, he died."  Even on the campaign trail, the presidential hopeful defended the employment of military support in Libya, describing it as "smart power at its best."

Nguyen writes:
Obama’s comments highlight a growing divide with Clinton as she seeks to win the Democratic presidential nomination. As secretary of state, Clinton was one of the strongest proponents of the U.S. intervention in the Libyan civil war against Gadhafi; according to the New York Times, the decision to commit military assets to ending the dictator’s 42-year-old regime was “arguably her moment of greatest influence as secretary of state.” While Obama has now pointed to that decision multiple times as one of his biggest regrets, he has also used the same logic to defend his reticence to intervene in Syria, where Clinton has urged a more militaristic approach, including a no-fly zone.

While Obama remains officially neutral in the Democratic race, as CNN notes, "He did vote in the Illinois primary—meaning he plainly prefers one candidate over the other—and hasn't been hesitant about defending his former secretary of state against political attacks and allegations of wrongdoing. But in doing so, his hands remain tied."
Meanwhile, the ongoing Justice Department investigation into possible national security violations Clinton may have committed through her use of a private email server has added another fraught layer to this dynamic.

In recent days, Obama received fierce criticism for acknowledging that, in his mind, there are different levels of "classified" information—a revelation which critics said betrays his favoritism for Clinton.

"And what I also know, because I handle a lot of classified information, is that there are—there’s classified, and then there’s classified," Obama said in the "Fox News Sunday" interview. "There’s stuff that is really top secret top secret, and there’s stuff that is being presented to the president or the secretary of state, that you might not want on the transom, or going out over the wire, but is basically stuff that you could get in open source."

As New York Times reporters David Sanger and Mark Landler wrote Monday, "these are distinctions the Obama administration has not necessarily made in its treatment of classified information when dealing with news organizations, whistle-blowers or government officials accused of leaking information."

Indeed, some of the individuals who have been prosecuted by the Obama administration for disclosing "classified" information fumed, and joked, over the president's remark.

If only I had known. https://t.co/yrPg8uxiQO
— Edward Snowden (@Snowden) April 10, 2016

Anyone have the number for the Attorney General? Asking for a friend. https://t.co/yrPg8uxiQO
— Edward Snowden (@Snowden) April 10, 2016

To protect Hillary, Obama invents a brand new theory of classified information unavailable to "lower rank-and-file" https://t.co/cZLZCd2bDg
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) April 12, 2016

"If you’re on trial for unauthorized disclosure of classified information, you don’t get to say, 'there’s classified, and then there’s classified,'" Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy for the Federation of American Scientists, told the Times.

While the president may have been making a comment on the bureaucratic nature of the classification process, the statement "failed to grapple with the fact that a bunch of people in his administration have been caught up in a meat-grinder as a result of classification policy," Aftergood added.

"It’s a two-tiered system of justice for people who have allegedly mishandled classified information," Jesselyn Radack, a whistleblower attorney and director of national security and human rights for the Whistleblower and Source Protection Program at Expose Facts, told Shadowproof journalist Kevin Gosztola. "If you are powerful or politically connected, you have nothing to worry about. But if you’re a low-level whistleblower whose made revelations that the government doesn’t want people to know about torture, about secret surveillance, about drones, that makes you fair game for prosecution and prosecution for espionage."

Citing President Richard Nixon who once declared, "If the president does it, that makes it legal," Gosztola writes: "In this case, if Hillary Clinton did it but the establishment still has a use for her because she is running for president, then it is legal."