A political appointee in
charge of vetting grants has said he is "on the lookout for 'the double
C-word'—climate change"
In what environmentalists
characterized as an "outrageous" scheme by the Trump administration
to put "politics before science," the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) is now only issuing grants and awards if they are approved by a political
appointee, the Washington Post's Juliet Eilperin reported
on Monday.
John Konkus—a GOP operative
who served as President Donald Trump's Leon County, Florida campaign
chairman—now "reviews every award the agency gives out, along with every
grant solicitation before it is issued," Eilperin noted.
She continued:
According to both career and
political employees, Konkus has told staff that he is on the lookout for
"the double C-word"—climate change—and repeatedly has instructed
grant officers to eliminate references to the subject in solicitations.
Konkus, who officially works
in the EPA's public affairs office, has canceled close to $2 million
competitively awarded to universities and nonprofit organizations. Although his
review has primarily affected Obama administration priorities, it is the
heavily Republican state of Alaska that has undergone the most scrutiny so far.
Liz Bowman, an EPA
spokeswoman, made clear in an interview with the Post that the purpose behind
having a political aide "screen" awards and grants has nothing to do
with scientific merit.
Rather, Konkus's role is
"ensure funding is in line with the agency's mission and policy
priorities," Bowman said.
Given the Trump
administration's moves during its first seven months in power—which include withdrawing
the U.S. from the Paris climate accord and dismantling regulations
aimed at protecting the air and water—environmentalists warned that the
EPA's new standard for grants and awards essentially amounts to a ban on climate
funding.
Ken Cook, president of the
Environmental Working Group, argued
that Trump's politicization of the EPA also harms "local leaders
struggling to protect their communities from pollution."
"To sum up," concluded Don
Moynihan, professor of government at the University of Wisconsin-Madison,
"someone with no scientific expertise is deciding on science grants for
reasons of ideology and spite."
No comments:
Post a Comment